FAIRY FOR CHILDREN

- Hallo friend FAIRY FOR CHILDREN, In the article you read this time with the title , we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article adventure, Article animation, Article fantasy, Article The latest, Article wit, we write can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title :
link :

NOT AGAIN?

WWW.MOEISSUESOFTHEDAY.
BLOGOESPOT.COM
Tuesday, Dec. 18, 2018
All Gave Some~Some Gave All
*****

Here’s the Difference Between Obama and Trump Paying for SilenceMark Wilson / Getty Images; Kevin Mazur / Getty Images for Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights

By Dick Morris

During the campaign of 2008, presidential candidate Barack Obama had his staff offer Rev. Jeremiah Wright $150,000 so as not to embarrass him.

During the campaign of 2016, presidential candidate Donald Trump had his lawyer offer porn star Stormy Daniels $130,000 to stop publicizing their affair and remain silent during the campaign so as not to embarrass him.

What’s the difference?

Why is Michael Cohen, Trump’s lawyer who made the offer, on his way to prison while Obama’s unidentified staffer has gone without so much as a slap on the wrist?

Why did a special prosecutor raid the offices of Trump’s lawyer to get the details of his offer to the porn star while there was no effort, by any prosecutor, to investigate Obama’s behavior?

And why is Trump facing impeachment for violating campaign finance laws with his payment while Obama did not get so much as a fine?

The report of the offer to Rev. Wright first surfaced in the book “The Amateur” by Ed Klein. He recounts an interview with Rev. Wright after the controversy about his anti-American remarks surfaced (in which he said 9/11 was just the “chickens coming home to roost” and “God-damn America.”)

“After the media went ballistic on me,” Wright told Klein, “I received an email offering me money not to preach at all until the November presidential election.”

“Who sent the email?” Klein asked Wright.

“It was from one of Barack’s closest friends.”

“He offered you money?”

“Not directly,” Wright said. “He sent the offer to one of the members of the church, who sent it to me.”

“How much money did he offer you?”

“One hundred and fifty thousand dollars,” Wright said.

“Did Obama himself ever make an effort to see you?” Klein asked.

“Yes,” Wright said. “Barack said he wanted to meet me in secret, in a secure place….And one of the first things Barack said was, ‘I really wish you wouldn’t do any more public speaking until after the November election.’ He knew I had some speaking engagements lined up, and he said, ‘I wish you wouldn’t speak. It’s gonna hurt the campaign if you do that.’”

“And what did you say?” Klein asked.

Wright replied: “I said, ‘I don’t see it that way. And anyway, how am I supposed to support my family?’”

The answer came a few days later with the offer of $150,000, clearly a bribe to be silent.

We have no confirmation that Obama’s staff or campaign committee actually paid Wright the bribe. The investigation never went that far. After all, the potential offender was a Democrat, Obama, and not a Republican, Trump.

I am grateful to my good friend Wayne Allen Root, a noted talk show host for suggesting this parallel to me.

Dick Morris is a former adviser to President Bill Clinton as well as a political author, pollster and consultant. His most recent book, “Rogue Spooks,” was written with his wife, Eileen McGann.

Trey Gowdy Shut Down James Comey With Just One Tweet

Former FBI Director James Comey’s recent testimony before Congress ignited a new firestorm of criticism over the Deep State’s efforts to remove Donald Trump from office.

Comey evaded questions and tried to cover up his role in this terrible crime.

But he didn’t get away with it because Trey Gowdy shut him down with just one tweet.

Gowdy and Comey began sparring during Comey’s testimony.

The South Carolina Republican could not wring straight answers out of Comey regarding the FBI’s use of the fake news Christopher Steele dossier in the Russia investigation.

Comey repeatedly claimed he couldn’t remember details about the FBI’s relationship with the Steele and the process for verifying the outrageous allegations made in the Trump-Russia dossier.

Gowdy went on Martha MacCallum’s Fox News show and ripped Comey for being an “amnesiac with incredible hubris.”

This stinging rebuke triggered Comey.

The former FBI Director presents himself as an incorruptible lawman whose moral compass always points north.

Comey could not stand having his carefully crafted public persona punctured by reality.

The disgraced former FBI Director fired off a tweet linking to an article about Gowdy’s Fox News appearance and whined “And I was worried this wouldn’t be a dignified, open-minded search for the truth.”

James Comey ✔@Comey

And I was worried this wouldn’t be a dignified, open-minded search for the truth.

1:45 PM - Dec 13, 2018

That did not sit well with Gowdy.

Gowdy clapped back by not only questioning Comey’s memory, but his competency in running the FBI.

“Director Comey, I was disappointed in what you didn’t remember, but even more disappointed in what you never knew. I’ll see you on Monday,” Gowdy tweeted.

Gowdy alluded to the fact that Republicans called Comey back for a second closed-door interview.

Democrats take over the House of Representatives in 16 days and Nancy Pelosi and her lieutenants will kill any investigations into the FBI’s corrupt anti-Trump bias.

The left knows that continuing the investigation into how the Obama administration colluded with the FBI to frame Trump for working with the Russians will take the wind out of the sails of the Mueller investigation.

So, Republicans are scrambling to explore every avenue of investigation before they are forced to surrender their majority.

Many Republicans believe Comey was not forthcoming in his original testimony.

They believe he relied on a crutch of a supposedly faulty memory in order to avoid having to answer questions in the final days of the Republican-controlled House of Representatives.

Republicans still run the Senate, but their rules for issuing subpoenas require Democrat participation.

House Republicans changed the rules to allow the majority to issue subpoenas without any input from the minority.

Comey knows that Republicans in the Senate are highly skeptical of the FBI’s conduct in the 2016 election, but that they are also handcuffed by the need for Democrat buy-in on subpoenaing witnesses in order to continue the investigation.

House Republicans’ interview with Comey is really the last best shot to pin him down on the lawless and rogue behavior he oversaw.




Fox hosts and analysts have much different views on Flynn ‘entrapment’: Which one of them nailed it?

Tom Tillison

“Fox & Friends” co-host Brian Kilmeade and Andrew Napolitano, the senior judicial analyst on the network, found themselves at opposite ends of the spectrum when it comes to whether the FBI entrapped former National Security Advisor Mike Flynn, who pleaded guilty to lying to the bureau.

In a segment featuring ex-Secret Service agent Dan Bongino, the discussion was on former FBI director James Comey testifying before Congress again on Monday — a scenario the very partisan Comey has learned to play well.

Bongino was asked what he would like to ask Comey and replied by saying he’d ask “why the heck” Flynn was questioned to begin with when news reports at the time said the FBI found nothing elicit after reviewing Flynn’s communications.

He scoffed at the FBI interviewing Flynn for a possible Logan Act violation, saying that never in U.S. history has it been successfully prosecuted.

“What is the Logan?” Kilmeade asked. “Working with the enemy. Did Jane Fonda get that? We saw video of her with the enemy. So, I mean, you’ve got to be kidding you are going after him for this reason?”

The “Fox & Friends” co-host also commented on how Flynn was approached by the bureau, which urged him not to have legal representation during the interview.

“He walked in and shook their hands and felt like one of the guys. He offered them a tour of the White House,” Kilmeade explained. “He sat down there, he thought they were talking among two buddies. They used that to [their] advantage.”

His sentiment consistent with what Flynn’s attorneys have suggested, that the bureau duped Flynn into making false statements — the theory being that once they have him in a compromising position, they could get him to flip on President Trump.

In a separate appearance on the Fox Business Network, Napolitano dismissed the claims that FBI agents entrapped Flynn when they interviewed him.

But his argument came down to a matter of semantics, as Napolitano agreed that the FBI “trapped” Flynn, but said that did not amount to “entrapping” him.

Fox Business Network host Maria Bartiromo pointed out during a panel discussion that former FBI director James Comey acknowledged he sent agents to the White House to interview Flynn.

This wasn’t standard practice and Comey admitted that it was “something I probably wouldn’t have done or maybe gotten away within a more organized administration.”

“Which is why the [Wall Street] Journal called it ‘entrapment,’” Bartiromo said.

“It’s actually — I saw your interview with General [Michael] Mukasey, in my opinion, he’s absolutely correct: though they trapped [Flynn], it’s not entrapment. Entrapment is when you resist and resist and resist and they push and push and push.”

“But they did trap him, I agree with that,” Bartiromo replied.

After a clip was played of Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., saying Flynn was entrapped, in comparison to a clip of Mukasey talking about the legal definition of entrapment, Napolitano added, “I wish that Darrell Issa were correct, and that General Mukasey were wrong. But it’s the other way around.”

It seems everyone agrees Flynn, who served his country as a member of the military for better than three decades, got screwed by Comey’s FBI — even if it falls just short, by definition, of an illegal screwing.




DOJ handling of Trump, Clinton probes shows potential ‘abuse of prosecutorial discretion’: Mollie Hemingway

Written by Foxnews

The Justice Department's divergent handling of the Clinton email and Russia investigations -- avoiding false-statement charges in one, while pursuing several in the other -- could demonstrate an "abuse of prosecutorial discretion," The Federalist senior editor Mollie Hemingway argued on the “Special Report” All-Star Panel Monday night on Fox News.

She discussed the DOJ and FBI's conduct ahead of former national security adviser Michael Flynn's sentencing, set for Tuesday, on a false-statement charge to which he pleaded guilty. Several other individuals also have been charged for false statements in the Russia case -- though no such charges were pursued during the lengthy investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email use while secretary of state.

“We have a really good test case. We have the FBI and the Department of Justice going after Hillary Clinton for breaking the law on classified information in which we saw the Department of Justice and FBI just bend over backwards, you know, giving immunity -- handing it out like candy, getting nothing in return, declining to prosecute anyone for false statements even though a ton of people have made false statements," Hemingway said.

Hours earlier, former FBI Director James Comey was questioned behind closed doors on Capitol Hill, about the bureau's handling of both investigations. Exiting the interview, he bashed Republicans, demanding that they "stand up for the values of this country" amid the attacks against the Department of Justice from President Trump.

Comey has been increasingly critical of congressional Republicans and Trump, blasting the president after he called ex-personal attorney Michael Cohen a "rat" and criticized the bureau for raiding his properties.

“This is from the President of our country, lying about the lawful execution of a search warrant issued by a federal judge,” Comey tweeted. “Shame on Republicans who don’t speak up at this moment – for the FBI, the rule of law, and the truth.”

James Comey ✔@Comey

This is from the President of our country, lying about the lawful execution of a search warrant issued by a federal judge. Shame on Republicans who don’t speak up at this moment — for the FBI, the rule of law, and the truth.

12:23 PM - Dec 16, 2018

Hemingway insisted that the “deeper issue at hand” is whether there has been an “abuse of prosecutorial discretion” at the DOJ and FBI.

“You have the FBI going after Cohen and seizing his records … and using this pretext of Russia collusion,” she added, claiming that the “Russia collusion” narrative is “falling apart.”

Washington Post opinion writer Charles Lane, though, backed Comey in his reaction to Trump’s tweet, saying that “not a whole lot” of the president’s claim about the FBI breaking into Cohen’s office was true and that his language and tone is “totally unbecoming of the office.”

“Having said that, I also think it’s kind of extraordinary that Comey over time now has become so enmeshed in this, so partisan. I’m not sure that’s necessarily to his personal benefit,” Lane said. “But on this one, at least on the substance, I think he’s right.”

Fox News Politics Editor Chris Stirewalt told the panel that Cohen, who was sentenced last week to three years in prison for tax evasion and other crimes, “did a lot of bad stuff” related and unrelated to Trump -- and said calls by Republicans for the DOJ to revisit Clinton’s mishandling of her emails and potential wrongdoing at the Clinton Foundation were “all fair.”

“The political predicament for this administration and for this president is the damage done because of the lies told about Stormy Daniels and campaign finance and really relatively minor stuff compared to what we’re talking about with the rest of the investigation,” Stirewalt said. “As in polls have demonstrated clearly, the president’s credibility has weakened, trust in Mueller is up, and as Mueller continues to get results, people are going to be less likely to hear from Trump as the aggrieved party.”




DIGENOVA: JIM COMEY — AMERICA’S DIRTIEST COP — IS AT IT AGAIN

By Joe DiGenova | Former US Attorney

James Comey is at it again — the dirtiest cop in America is desperate to defend his rotten reputation and conceal the Democrat plot to undermine President Trump.

Last week, lawmakers extensively questioned Comey about the political bias within the FBI and the bureau’s integrity. As was the case in his previous testimonies, Comey did not feel a “higher loyalty” to tell the truth, or even to answer most of the questions he was asked.

Instead of addressing the concerns of the American people, Comey merely parroted his previous talking points and repeatedly told Congress that he either doesn’t know or can’t remember important details about his prior conduct.

“On 245 occasions, former FBI Director James Comey told House investigators he didn’t know, didn’t recall, or couldn’t remember things when asked,” President Trump tweetedafter the testimony. “[Comey] opened investigations on 4 Americans (not 2) – didn’t know who signed off and didn’t know Christopher Steele. All lies!”

President Trump is right — Comey must have just committed perjury. The former FBI director did everything he could to avoid answering key questions about his own conduct and the politicization of the bureau — a disgraceful tactic that he adopted as soon as he learned about a possible subpoena last month.

“House Republicans can ask me anything they want but I want the American people to watch, so let’s have a public hearing,” he tweeted at the time. “Truth is best served by transparency.  Let me know when is convenient.”

Comey, however, knew that a public hearing would have sheltered him from a barrage of detailed questions because they would have included references to classified information that can’t be addressed publicly — a far-cry from the “ask me anything” demeanor he tried to project in public. Comey’s assertion that truth is best served by transparency is correct — it’s just a pity that he couldn’t stay loyal to his own convictions during last week’s hearing.

What is even more disgraceful, however, is the extraordinary double-standard within the FBI. If you compare the ongoing Russia probe to the toothless investigation of Hillary Clinton, the politicization of the bureau quickly becomes self-evident.

While the FBI is busy digging through President Trump’s taxes and investigating his former campaign associates over matters completely unrelated to the Russia probe, a brazen plot to exonerate Hillary Clinton and frame Donald Trump goes untouched.

It is often said that organizations mirror the values of their leadership — so perhaps we shouldn’t be too surprised by the hypocrisy of the FBI in the Obama era.

Where are the extensive investigations now into the conduct of Christopher Steele, Sally Yates, Bruce Ohr, John Brennan, Peter Strzok, and other blatantly-biased senior DOJ and FBI officials? Why did the FBI fail to comply with House subpoenas? The American people deserve to know.

Sadly, the Democrat Party will do everything in its power to ensure that the American people never get the full truth.

The Democrats are literally treating the probe as a joke, shamelessly admitting that they have no interest in addressing unanswered questions from prior testimonies. Instead of approaching the hearing seriously, one Democrat reportedly brought a copy of Comey’s book, ironically titled A Higher Loyalty, so that she could get an autograph.

“I’m hoping to get a signed copy to auction off to pay for this wasteful investigation,” Oversight Committee member Raja Krishnamoorthi explained.

The Democrats simply don’t care about the truth. In fact, they’ve already pledged to bury the congressional probe of Comey and the FBI as soon as they officially take control of the House of Representatives in January.

The dirtiest cop in America won’t repair the broken reputation of the FBI by carrying water for the president’s political foes. The American people deserve real answers about those who conspired to undermine President Trump.

Joseph DiGenova served as U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia from 1983 to 1988.

G’ day…Ciao…
Helen and Moe Lauzier

Thus articles

that is all articles This time, hopefully can provide benefits to you all. Okay, see you in another article post.

You are now reading the article the link address https://fairyforreference.blogspot.com/2018/12/not-again-www.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: