- Hallo friend FAIRY FOR CHILDREN, In the article you read this time with the title , we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article adventure, Article animation, Article fantasy, Article The latest, Article wit, we write can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title :
link :

Read also



http://ift.tt/2t3211e
.BLOGSPOT. COM
For Sun, Dec. 10, 2017
~All Gave Some~Some Gave

All~God Bless America


Nolte — Flashback: WaPo Document Expert Said Forged Roy Moore Yearbook ‘Consistent with One Writer’


by JOHN NOLTE

Beverly Young Nelson, left, and attorney Gloria Allred hold Nelson’s high school yearbook, which they say was signed by Senate candidate Roy Moore, at a news conference in New York on Monday. (Richard Drew/AP)

Three weeks ago, in a partisan effort to dismiss what is now an admitted forgery, and what at the time was an obvious forgery, the left-wing Washington Post’s Philip Bump (already a proven liar) consulted former FBI agent Mark Songer, a forensics documents examiner, to examine a yearbook produced by one of Roy Moore’s accusers as evidence he assaulted her. The expert concluded that the “writing seems consistent with one writer.”
The context of when Bump published this piece is important. If you recall, the Washington Post was the news outlet that first broke the story of the Moore allegations, and it was during this time that outside fact-checking of the Post‘s reporting revealed serious lapses, all them pointing to a Moore accuser who manufactured a false narrative.
But in a Friday morning interview on ABC’s Good Morning America, Beverly Young Nelson admitted that she had forged a portion of what she still claims (with no credibility) is truly Moore’s signature. The following exchange is crucially important if you are to understand just how dishonest the Washington Post is:
“Beverly, he signed your yearbook,” ABC News reporter Tom Llamas says.
“He did sign it,” she replies.
“And you made some notes underneath.”
“Yes,” Nelson admits.
The “notes underneath” she references are the following:

Now, this is why this is so important:
1) This forged portion was used to back up Nelson’s now discredited claim that Moore assaulted her as a 16-year-old.
2) This forged portion — and you are not going to believe this — is the specific part of the inscription the Washington Post’s handwriting expert examined.
Anyone with half a brain and even a dollop of intellectual honesty knew that this portion of the inscription did not match the rest. (Moore denies writing any of it.) I declaratively said so two weeks ago. But here is Bump’s former FBI agent reassuring the public:
“Looking at the yearbook entry,” [Songer] said, “it looks pretty spontaneously prepared” — that is, it doesn’t look like the writer stopped and restarted, as though someone were tentative in writing perhaps because they were trying to imitate another writer. “It looks very fluid. I don’t see any indications of unnatural writing.”
“The writing seems consistent with one writer,” he added, though he pointed out that ‘Old Hickory House’ and the second date appear to be different stylistically — though he’d need to see examples of Moore’s hand-printed writing to be able to determine whether it’s authentic.
This is not only another black eye for Bump, the Washington Post, and all of the mainstream media; it is yet another black eye for an FBI that is increasingly seen as a partisan mob of secret police working hand-in-hand with a corrupt media to overturn elections.




Democrats forced a vote to impeach Trump and no one could believe the result

Donald Trump

Democrats finally got their wish
Liberals in Congress forced a vote on articles of impeachment against Donald Trump.
And no one could believe the result.

Democrat Congressman Al Green was able to force a vote on impeaching Trump based on ridiculous charges such as his response to the tragedy in Charlottesville and the President demanding NFL players stand for the national anthem.

But the result was stunning.

Even Democrats ran away from trying to impeach Trump and the vote failed by an embarrassing 356-58 margin.

Even Nancy Pelosi rejected the idea of impeaching Trump.
Politico reports:

“The motion to sideline the measure — killing the effort — was approved 364-58, with four Democrats voting present.

The vote was forced by Rep. Al Green (D-Texas), who introduced articles of impeachment describing Trump as a bigot who incites hate and has demeaned the presidency.

“Donald John Trump, by causing such harm to the society of the United States is unfit to be president and warrants impeachment, trial and removal from office,” Green said on the House floor as he introduced the articles.

But Green, a seven-term, Houston-area lawmaker, said his conscience compelled him to push forward with the measure, even though he acknowledged he was unlikely to succeed.

“Now is not the time to consider articles of impeachment,” Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi and Minority Whip Steny Hoyer said in a joint statement, shortly after Green introduced his articles of impeachment.”

Pushing impeachment is a losing cause for Democrats.

They do not want to be seen as part of the swamp in overturning the results of the 2016 election.

If conservatives believe Trump’s Presidency is at stake, they will flock to the polls in 2018 and block the Democrats’ attempt to take back control of Congress.




Franken Accuser: I’m ‘Appalled’ Franken Won’t Own Up to What He Did


On Thursday’s “MSNBC Live,” Stephanie Kemplin, one of Senator Al Franken’s (D-MN) accusers, criticized Franken for failing to take responsibility for his actions, including “trying to pass the buck onto other individuals, who possibly — they did commit the same things, maybe even more heinous than what he’s done.”
Anchor Chris Jansing asked, “As you watch what happened today, is this justice?”
Kemplin answered, “No, I think, you know, what is justice in this situation? It’s just sad overall. His resignation is just one of the consequences for what he’s put us through.”
Jansing then asked, “And so is there anything that for you would be justice?”
Kemplin responded, “I have to say that I’m so sad and appalled at his lack of response and him owning up to what he did. I feel that he just keeps passing the buck and making it out to be something that we took his behavior the wrong way, or we misconstrued something, or that we’re just — we’ve just flat-out lied about what happened to us. And I — justice to me would be him owning up to what he did, and to stop trying to pass the buck onto other individuals, who possibly — they did commit the same things, maybe even more heinous than what he’s done.”
Tarana Burke, the founder of the #MeToo movement, agreed with Kemplin, saying, “I wish that he would be more direct and have an apology. I think this really about accountability. And as Stephanie just expressed, it’s not justice unless there’s actual accountability. Him stepping down, you know, means something. It does make a statement about what’s tolerable in his position, in his role as a leader. But in a more personal way, this is about what he did to people, an interpersonal exchange with what he did to people, and an apology and having some accountability for that behavior would be better.”
Follow Ian Hanchett on Twitter @IanHanchett




Concealed Carry Reciprocity Passes U.S. House of Representatives!

SUPPORT NRA-ILA


Concealed Carry Reciprocity Passes U.S. House of Representatives!

In a resounding show of support for the Second Amendment, the U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday passed a legislative package that included H.R. 38, the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017, and H.R. 4477, the Fix NICS Act of 2017. The bipartisan vote of 231 to 198 advanced a measure that would allow law-abiding Americans who are eligible to carry a concealed handgun under the law of a state to do so in all other U.S. states and territories that recognize the right of their own residents to carry concealed. Without a doubt, this is the strongest piece of self-defense legislation to ever come before Congress. It would also help shore up the National Instant Criminal Background Check System used for licensing and retail firearm purchases by adding additional layers of transparency and accountability to the system.
With Wednesday’s vote, the U.S. Congress ratified the premise that firearms in the hands of law-abiding Americans are a force for good. This of course has been borne out again and again over the past three decades, as more and more Americans have embraced their right to bear arms for self-defense through concealed carry. The nation’s violent crime rate has fallen to historic lows during this time, and concealed carry licensees have proven themselves one of the most law-abiding populations in America.
Today, all 50 states have laws under which residents may carry or apply to carry a concealed handgun for self-defense. Forty-two states and the District of Columbia broadly recognize a right to do so. The remaining eight states, however, have laws that allow even the most qualified applicants to be denied a license unless they can show an extraordinary “reason” for having one.
This results in an arbitrary and unconstitutional system where people are denied their right to carry not because they’re a public safety risk but because licensing officials simply don’t believe that “ordinary” people should have the right. Meanwhile, favoritism and corruption are permitted to flourish, with licenses handed out to celebrities, rich political donors, and sometimes even applicants with disqualifying backgrounds who can afford to bribe the right people.  
H.R. 38 would end this two-tiered system and ensure that no upstanding American would be denied an effective means of self-defense while traveling from state to state.
Needless to say, anti gun forces will be marshalling an all-out effort to try to block concealed carry reciprocity in the Senate. The same people who insist that Congress has essentially unlimited authority to pass nationwide gun control that would undermine the pro-gun polices of most states are hypocritically citing “states’ rights” as a reason to oppose concealed carry reciprocity.
Yet under H.R. 38, states would maintain complete control of the standards by which they issue their own concealed carry licenses. And property owners, whether public or private, would maintain discretion over the carrying of firearms on their own premises. The primary effect of the bill would be that a handful of anti-gun states could no longer arrest and prosecute travelers simply for crossing into their territory with an otherwise lawfully carried concealed handgun. Any criminal behavior committed with that firearm, of course, would still be subject to the full force of local law.
Opponents of H.R. 38 argued against the bill by citing statistics concerning firearm-related crime and suicide. They did and could not, however, establish that lawful concealed carriers are the driving force of these incidents. Indeed, violent crime and criminals who recognize no restrictions on their own actions are the very reason law-abiding people wish to have their own means of self-protection. Concealed carry reciprocity simply helps even the playing field between law-abiding Americans and predatory criminals.
If the Senate is to send the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act to President Trump for his long-promised signature, American gun owners will have to make their voices heard as never before in the nation’s history.
Wednesday’s vote was a huge step forward for the right of law-abiding Americans to carry a firearm for self-protection, but the fight is not over yet.

Why America Must Be Great

Originally published at Fox News.
Why America Must Be Great
Watching the world from Rome, Italy, I have been struck by how many things are happening across the globe which are radically different from our previous expectations and past analyses. In fact, they are so different, none of the patterns and models I have learned in the past can accommodate them.
The more I have thought about the current period of rapid change, uncertainty, and reaction our world is living through, the more I am convinced we are closer to Alvin Toffler’s concept of future shock than any traditional pattern we have commonly understood and accepted.
Human history is an ever-changing ecosystem that is constantly evolving, reacting, and adapting with the passage of time. Toffler argues in his book, Future Shock, that the world has an adaptive range – a particular amount of change it is capable of implementing within a certain time frame.
There are times throughout history when worldly change is collectively methodical and slow – below the adaptive range threshold – leading to a period of boredom and stagnation. When the acceleration of change is above the adaptive range threshold, the world experiences what Toffler calls, future shock.
The world is currently overwhelmed with the pace of social, technological, and political change that is occurring, and is ultimately stunned and essentially paralyzed. Everything from our established institutions and societal structures, to our foundational American beliefs and values, are being challenged and forced to react to this exponentially rapid rate of global transformation.
Consider the following eight items:
  • At one point Thursday, the digital currency Bitcoin was valued at more than $19,000. On Dec. 31, 2016, it was trading at $968. This represents a more than 1,800 percent increase.
  • Chinese President Xi Jinping has gained power that rivals Mao Zedong and is initiating a fully totalitarian regime in China (complete with a citizen loyalty scoring system). China may soon pose an existential challenge to the United States, unlike any we have faced.
  • The collapse of Puerto Rico stands to completely transform Central Florida.
  • Catalonia is seeking to secede from Spain, and two Italian provinces desire more independence from Italy.
  • North Korea has developed intercontinental ballistic missile technology that could potentially hit any target in the United States.
  • Germany’s open-door refugee policy has led to record attacks on German police by migrants, and there’s little the police can do to contain the situation.
  • Personal privacy has been completely redefined by data collection technology through smart phones and web browsing, while the threat of hacking puts all of our information at risk of exploitation by criminals and foreign governments.
  • Uber is planning to buy approximately 24,000 driverless cars from Volvo (now owned by Geely Global, a Chinese multinational company). The data collection implications are staggering.
This realization that the entire world may actually be in shock over these rapid changes has helped to clarify a few things for me about American politics and culture – specifically the importance and staying power of the make America great again movement.
Americans have been watching these rapid global changes, and they have intuited that their futures will be more secure if America is boldly standing on the global stage with maximum strength. I am convinced this is one of the principle feelings driving the nationalist desire for greater sovereignty that we have seen in America and other Western countries.
The news media has continued to miss this, because capturing the turmoil of America and the world requires a much broader cultural sweep – a wider view of developments – than focusing narrowly on the White House, politics, or supposedly relevant distractions.
President Xi Jinping’s rise to power in China is a perfect example. The changes in China could have a significant impact on the world for the next century. Yet the American news media barely spent any time on Xi’s three-hour speech laying out his plan to make China the dominant world power.
What has become clear to me is that “Make America great again” is not a simple campaign slogan – it is an imperative.
America must be great if it is going to break out of the chaotic state of future shock and lead the world through these massive transitions to adopt fundamental and lasting innovative change.
Your Friend,
Newt Gingrich

EXCLUSIVE  Breitbart’s Jerusalem– Jackie Mason on Gloria Allred: She Makes Hillary Clinton Sound Honest

by AARON KLEIN

Allred is representing Beverly Young Nelson, the latest woman to come forward and allege Moore sexually assaulted her when she was a teenager. (Eduardo Munoz Alvarez/Pool Photo via AP)
Eduardo Munoz Alvarez/AP
by AARON KLEIN8 Dec 2017345

BIRMINGHAM, Alabama — Comic legend Jackie Mason slammed lawyer and activist Gloria Allred as “the only person in the world that can make Hillary Clinton sound like an honest human being.”

“I don’t know any hooker in any wh*rehouse who is a bigger fake or fraud than her,” added Mason. “Every time she opens her mouth, you could bet your life there is another lie coming out. Even when she keeps her mouth closed, she finds a way to do something crooked.”
Mason was responding to Allred’s repeated refusal to release to the custody of an independent examiner the original copy of a yearbook that contains the only piece of physical evidence to be presented in the cases of numerous women who have gone public with stories alleging inappropriate conduct between Senatorial candidate Roy Moore and teenage girls.
Allred’s client, Moore-accuser Beverly Young Nelson, admitted on Friday to writing some of the words herself on the alleged Moore inscription in her yearbook.
Mason was speaking in a recorded interview set to air Sunday on this reporter’s talk radio program, Aaron Klein Investigative Radio, broadcast on New York’s AM 970 The Answer and NewsTalk 990 AM in Philadelphia.
Mason quipped, “This yenta, Gloria Allred is not only a fake. She is the only person in the world that can make Hillary Clinton sound like an honest human being. She makes Hillary look like a delicate, wonderful person. She makes Hillary look like a nun or a rabbi.
“They say lawyers lie. But not like her. She makes every lawyer in the world sound like an honest, decent person.  What a degenerate.”
Nelson on Friday told ABC News that she added “notes” under what she claims is Moore’s signature on her high school yearbook. Those “notes” seem to be the date and location — “12-22-77 Olde Hickory House.”
At her original press conference with Allred, Nelson claimed that Moore wrote the entire yearbook inscription. She stated, “He wrote in my yearbook as follows: ‘To a sweeter more beautiful girl, I could not say Merry Christmas, Christmas, 1977, Love, Roy Moore, Olde Hickory House. Roy Moore, DA.”
Allred held a press conference Friday to defend Nelson. “Beverly indicates that she added that to remind herself of who Roy Moore was and where and when Mr. Moore signed her yearbook,” she stated.
Nelson also failed to disclose that Moore’s stamped signature appeared on her 1999 divorce document.
That stamped signature raises more questions about the yearbook inscription, particularly the initials D.A. which appear in both the yearbook after Moore’s alleged signature and in Nelson’s previously undisclosed divorce document from two decades later.  The 1999 divorce document was stamped with Moore’s signature, and initialed “DA” by Moore’s assistant at the time, Delbra Adams.
Breitbart News interviewed Adams, who explained it is normal procedure for a clerk to initial a stamped signature on a legal document to verify that the stamp is authentic.
Phillip L. Jauregui, a Moore campaign attorney, raised numerous questions about the signature, including about the “DA,” attempting to link it to a signature on Nelson’s 1999 divorce document. “After Judge Moore’s signature, it has the initials capital D.A. Remember I told you about that 99 divorce action? Judge Moore looked at that ‘DA’ after his signature.”
“Judge Moore says he can’t remember ever signing his name with DA after it. But he had seen it before. You know where he had seen it? When he was on the bench, his assistant whose initials are capital D. A. Delbra Adams would stamp his signature on a document and put capital D. A. That’s exactly how this signature appears on the divorce decree that Judge Moore signed dismissing the divorce action of Beverly Nelson.”
Nelson said that she originally met Moore when he was a 30-year-old deputy district attorney in Etowah County and would regularly eat at a restaurant in Gadsden called Olde Hickory House.
Nelson claims that Moore used to compliment her on her looks and that he signed her yearbook in 1977 sometime just before Christmas.
Nelson’s stepson, Darrel Nelson, claimed in an interview with this reporter that his stepmother’s accusations are “one hundred percent a lie.”
A minister who says that he dated Nelson at around the same time that she claims to have been assaulted by Moore told Breitbart News that he does not believe his ex-girlfriend about the allegations.  The former boyfriend, Jeff DeVine, attended high school with Young and is currently in Thailand, where he runs DeVine Ministries with his wife and twin daughters. He says that as part of his ministry, which focuses on rescuing children, he has worked with victims of rape and other trauma.
Aaron Klein is Breitbart’s Jerusalem bureau chief and senior investigative reporter. He is a New York Times bestselling author and hosts the popular weekend talk radio program,”Aaron Klein Investigative Radio.” Follow him on Twitter @AaronKleinShow.

New Poll Shows Roy Moore Up by 7 in Alabama Senate Race Based on Recent Deciders


jones-moore
AP Photos

A new poll released Friday afternoon by Change Research of the Alabama U.S. Senate special election to be held next Tuesday shows conservative Republican Roy Moore leads liberal Democrat Doug Jones by seven points among likely voters, 51 percent to 44 percent.

Write-in-candidate Lee Busby garnered the support of two percent of poll respondents, while three percent were undecided.
Our new poll shows Roy Moore now ahead 51-44. Moore leads among those who recently decided, 61-22. And the word late deciders most often use in describing how they make their decision? It’s not “allegations” or “teenage” — it’s “Democrat.” https://t.co/XAFNKtQjAZ
— Change Research (@ChangePolls) December 8, 2017
The momentum in the race seems to be moving in Moore’s direction, according to the poll results.
Among the four percent who say they have decided in the last week, voters are moving to Moore over Jones by an almost three to one margin. Sixty-one percent said they are voting for Moore, while only 22 percent said they are voting for Jones ,and 15 percent are voting for the write-in candidate.
The poll was based on 2,433 interviews conducted online on Tuesday, December 5, making it the most recent measure of voter attitudes in the hotly contested race, which will see precincts open for voting in less than 84 hours.
A poll released by Change Research ten days ago, on November 28, showed Moore with a five point lead. The two point increase for Moore from 49 percent in the earlier poll to 51 percent in the poll released on Friday is significant, as it puts Moore over the critical 50 percent mark.
Party affilation among the sample of likely voters responding was reflective of recent voting behavior in the state: 42 percent Republican, 27 percent Democrat, and 31 percent Independent.
In the 2016 Republican presidential election, Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton by a 28 point margin, 63 percent to 25 percent. Virtually all Republicans voted for Trump, virtually all Democrats voted for Clinton, and Independents voted for Trump by a 2-to-1 margin.
Among Trump voters who plan on voting in Tuesday’s special Alabama U.S. Senate election, 82 percent say they will vote for Moore, nine percent say they will vote for Jones, three percent are for the write-in candidate, and five percent are undecided.
The 18 percent of Trump voters who say they will not vote for Moore appear to be Republicans who voted for Sen. Luther Strange (R-AL) in the primary, who was defeated by Moore in a contentious primary runoff in September.
Only fifty-seven percent of Republicans who voted for Luther Strange say they will vote for Moore, while 28 percent will vote for the Democrat Jones. Eight percent will vote for the write-in candidate and six percent are undecided.
Among Clinton voters, 95 percent say they will vote for Jones, three percent say they will vote for Moore, and two percent are undecided.

G’ day…Ciao…
Helen and Moe Lauzier


Thus articles

that is all articles This time, hopefully can provide benefits to you all. Okay, see you in another article post.

You are now reading the article the link address https://fairyforreference.blogspot.com/2017/12/httpift_9.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to " "

Post a Comment