Title :
link :
http://ift.tt/2t3211e
.BLOGSPOT.COM
Tues. Aug.8, 2017
~All Gave Some~Some Gave All~ God Bless America~

Those were the days....
Stay with this -- the answer is at the end.
It may blow you away.
One evening a grandson was talking to his grandfather about current events.
The grandson asked his grandfather what he thought about the shootings at schools, the computer age, and just things in general..
The Grandfather replied, "Well, let me think a minute, I was born before:
' television
' penicillin
' polio shots
' frozen foods
' Xerox
' contact lenses
' Frisbees and
' the pill
There were no:
' credit cards
' laser beams or
' ballpoint pens
Man had not invented :
' pantyhose
' air conditioners
' dishwashers
' clothes dryers
' and the clothes were hung out to dry in the fresh air and
' space travel was only in Flash Gordon books.
Your Grandmother and I got married first,... and then lived together..
Every family had a father and a mother. Until I was 25, I called every woman older than me, "mam". And after I turned 25, I still called policemen and every man with a title, "Sir."
We were before gay-rights, computer-dating, dual careers, daycare centers, and group therapy.
Our lives were governed by the Bible, good judgment, and common sense. We were taught to know the difference between right and wrong and to stand up and take responsibility for our actions.
Serving your country was a privilege; living in this country was a bigger privilege... We thought fast food was eating half a biscuit while running to catch the school bus.
Having a meaningful relationship meant getting along with your cousins.
Draft dodgers were those who closed front doors as the evening breeze started.
Time-sharing meant time the family spent together in the evenings and weekends-not purchasing condominiums.
We never heard of FM radios, tape decks, CDs, electric typewriters, yogurt, or guys wearing earrings.
We listened to Big Bands, Jack Benny, and the President's speeches on our radios. And I don't ever remember any kid blowing his brains out listening to Tommy Dorsey.
If you saw anything with 'Made in Japan ' on it, it was junk.
The term 'making out' referred to how you did on your school exam....
Pizza Hut, McDonald's, and instant coffee were unheard of.
We had 5 &10-cent stores where you could actually buy things for 5 and 10 cents. Ice-cream cones, phone calls, rides on a streetcar, and a Pepsi were all a nickel. And if you didn't want to splurge, you could spend your nickel on enough stamps to mail 1 letter and 2 postcards.
You could buy a new Ford Coupe for $600, ... but who could afford one? Too bad, because gas was 11 cents a gallon.
In my day:
' "grass" was mowed,
' "coke" was a cold drink,
' "pot" was something your mother cooked in and
' "rock music" was your grandmother's lullaby.
' "Aids" were helpers in the Principal's office,
' "chip" meant a piece of wood,
' "hardware" was found in a hardware store and
' "software" wasn't even a word.
And we were the last generation to actually believe that a lady needed a husband to have a baby.
No wonder people call us "old and confused" and say there is a generation gap.
How old do you think I am?
I bet you have this old man in mind....you are in for a shock!
Read on to see -- pretty scary if you think about it and pretty sad at the same time .
Are you ready ?????
This Man Would Be Only 75 Years Old Today. (Yes I am).
GIVES YOU SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT... PASS THIS ON TO THE OLD ONES, THE YOUNG ONES DON'T BELIEVE IT.
The Left Insisted That 'Money Isn't Speech' - Until Donald Trump Jr. Met With the Russian Lawyer
IJR Opinion is an opinion platform and any opinions or information put forth by contributors are exclusive to them and do not represent the views of IJR.
For years, the Left has screamed that money and speech are not one and the same.
In 2010, President Obama claimed the Citizens United ruling—which protects your individual right of free speech when you exercise your right to associate as part of a membership group, corporation, or other entity—“strikes at democracy itself.” Not long after, retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul declared: “While money is used to finance speech, money is not speech.”
Last year, Hillary Clinton promised a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United and declared an anti-speech litmus test for Supreme Court appointments if she was elected. Thankfully, she wasn’t.
The Left isn’t wrong—money is not speech. It’s money. But you can’t have any meaningful speech without spending money. It is the oxygen fueling the fire of political speech. Regulating speech—and the money needed to convey ideas to the public—leaves America with less freedom, and worse off.
However, in a strange twist, the Left’s mind-numbing hatred of President Trump has led to a new, absurd position: Speech is money!
After Donald Trump Jr. met with Natalia Veselnitskaya—a Russian lawyer with connections to the Kremlin—to discuss potentially damaging information about Clinton, the Left lost their minds. The left-wing magazine Slate ranted “a crime has been committed” because Trump Jr. purportedly received a contribution “of value” from Veselnitskaya (e.g. gossip).
Vox suggested Trump Jr. broke campaign finance laws because “political campaigns regularly pay thousands of dollars to opposition researchers”—even though he personally did nothing of the kind. It’s a “criminal conspiracy,” claimed Cornell law professor Jens David Ohlin. Noah Bookbinder of the perennial campaign finance scold Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington also denounced Trump Jr.’s alleged solicitation of a “foreign campaign contribution.”
It’s all nonsense because Veselnitskaya’s act of speech—gossiping and sharing information—is simply not a contribution “of value.” No matter how far you torture the facts and the law, her speech is simply not the equivalent of money.
But the Left won’t let that stand in the way of a fundraising scam. Liberal “advocacy” groups Common Cause, Democracy 21, and the Campaign Legal Center filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission accusing Trump Jr. of soliciting and accepting a foreign contribution. Because he gossiped about Clinton.
The Left’s hypocrisy is stunning: Pre-Trump, “Money is not speech!” But now that it’s convenient, “Speech is money!” Because, well, Trump.
The Left’s solution is to regulate, regulate, regulate. By restricting what Trump Jr.—or any American—is allowed to hear and say, the Left strikes at the right of every American. It is a fundamental right of every American to speak with anyone they want about anything they want—including useless gossip about presidential politics. If only the Left can stop people from engaging in speech they don’t like, perhaps liberals can start winning elections again.
Famous Investigative Journalist Drops Seth Rich Bombshell
BY BENJAMIN ARIE
The Democrat Party and other groups on the left have been scrambling to dismiss questions surrounding the still-mysterious case of murdered Democrat National Committee staffer Seth Rich — but despite their best efforts, the story won’t go away.
Now, one of the most respected investigative journalists in recent history is speaking out about Rich’s death… and he just dropped a major bombshell that links the murdered DNC staffer to the infamous Wikileaks emails.
Seymour Hersh is no small-time reporter — and he’s certainly no right-wing talking head. The renowned journalist and author is the person who exposed the My Lai massacre during the Vietnam War and the Abu Ghraib prison scandal — and he received a Pulitzer Prize for international reporting along the way.
Like a moth to a flame, the veteran reporter was drawn to the Seth Rich story, and Hersh began investigating it using his well-honed skills and contacts.
An audio recording of Hersh discussing the Rich case has been obtained by several media outlets, including Big League Politics and American Thinker. In it, he provides some damning observations about top American intelligence officials — and the possibility they haven’t been telling the whole truth about the affair.
The Pulitzer-winning journalist explained that FBI documents prove that Seth Rich contacted Wikileaks not long before he was murdered, and provided sample emails from the Democratic National Committee to WikiLeaks to prove he had something solid to offer.
“What the report says is that some time in late spring… [Rich] makes contact with WikiLeaks, that’s in his computer,” Hersh said, citing an FBI report about the case.
The long-respected journalist said it was a fact that Seth Rich had access to the DNC emails, and provided some of them to Wikileaks to prove that he was serious.
The long-respected journalist said it was a fact that Seth Rich had access to the DNC emails, and provided some of them to Wikileaks to prove that he was serious.
“All I know is that he offered a sample, an extensive sample, I’m sure dozens of emails, and said ‘I want money.’ Later, WikiLeaks did get the password, he had a DropBox [online storage account], a protected DropBox,” Hersh said. “They got access to the DropBox.”
Hersh also hinted that Rich may have known that sharing the now infamous Democrat emails would put a target on his back.
“The word was passed, according to the NSA report, he also shared this DropBox with a couple of friends, so that ‘if anything happens to me it’s not going to solve your problems,’” Hersh explained. “WikiLeaks got access before he was killed.”
In other words, Hersh indicated that it was Rich, not Russia, who was the source of the DNC emails that were published by WikiLeaks.
The investigative journalist also agreed with the possibility that insiders invented the story of Russian involvement to purposely derail the Trump presidency, and cover up the true source of the leaks that caused such massive problems for the Hillary Clinton campaign.
“Trump’s not wrong to think they all f——- lied about him,” Hersh said.
To add to the intrigue, WikiLeaks itself posted Hersh’s audiotape on its Twitter account, which could be seen as an endorsement of Hersh’s statements.
✔@wikileaks
Audio tape of Seymour Hersh discussing WikiLeaks DNC leaks and Seth Rich https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giuZdBAXVh0 … h/t @CassandraRules
If Hersh is right — and he often is — then it seems extremely unlikely that Rich’s murder was the isolated incident some authorities are claiming.
With so much unknown, anything is possible, of course. However, it’s undeniable that at least some signs point to the strong possibility that somebody found out that the staffer was leaking incriminating emails from the Democrat Party, and took deadly action to silence him.
The American people deserve to know the truth. One piece at a time, the official narrative is unraveling.
Helen and Moe Lauzier
Thus articles
that is all articles
This time, hopefully can provide benefits to you all. Okay, see you in another article post.
You are now reading the article the link address https://fairyforreference.blogspot.com/2017/08/httpift.html
0 Response to " "
Post a Comment