Title :
link :
WWW.MOEISSUESOFTHEDAY
.BLOGSPOT.COM
Saturday, April 20, 2017
All Gave Some~Some Gave All
*****
Elizabeth Warren calls for impeachment proceedings against Trump
by Emily Larsen
Democratic presidential candidate and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren on Friday called on the House of Representatives to initiate impeachment proceedings against President Trump.
"The Mueller report lays out facts showing that a hostile foreign government attacked our 2016 election to help Donald Trump and Donald Trump welcomed that help. Once elected, Donald Trump obstructed the investigation into that attack," Warren began in a series of tweets.
"The severity of this misconduct demands that elected officials in both parties set aside political considerations and do their constitutional duty. That means the House should initiate impeachment proceedings against the President of the United States," Warren said.
Pocahontas Calls for Impeachment with Forked Tongue
Warren is the first top-tier Democratic presidential candidate to call for impeachment proceedings against Trump. Her statement followed the Thursday release of special counsel Robert Mueller's report on Russian interference in the 2016 election, which found that some Trump campaign officials communicated with Russians but that the actions did not rise to the level of criminal conspiracy.
Mueller also examined instances in which Trump may have obstructed justice, but he did not make a determination on the charge. Warren noted a key line in the report: “Congress has authority to prohibit a President’s corrupt use of his authority in order to protect the integrity of the administration of justice.”
With release of Muller report, the greatest political scandal and media hoax ever has finally
JD Heyes
With Attorney General William Barr’s release of a redacted version of special counsel Robert Mueller’s final report on “collusion” between then-GOP candidate Donald Trump and Mother Russia, in which Mueller cleared the president ‘officially,’ the greatest political and media hoax in the history of our republic officially came crashing down.
And yet, even as it did, the report itself was written in such a way as to still be ‘politically useful’ to Democrats, and that wasn’t by accident.
First, the facts.
— Mueller found that President Trump did not “collude” with Russia because there was never any collusion to begin with; it was a fabricated allegation devised by the Obama administration and Democrat-aligned Deep State operatives in the U.S. intelligence community and Justice Department to undermine Trump and hopefully drive him from office. A newly published paper by a former CIA analyst helps explain how it is possible that something like this could even happen: Political considerations over oaths of office and commitment to serve the legitimate government of the United States.
— This was never an “investigation” in the normal sense of the word. The “Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election,” as Mueller’s volume is titled, was really just an extensive effort to find evidence, any evidence, that would support the fabricated allegation, no matter how tenuous or thin it was.
— Mueller noted that while he couldn’t charge the president with “obstruction of justice” in the probe, neither should the report serve to “exonerate” him. This is Mueller doing his best James Comey interpretation; like FBI directors aren’t supposed to determine what charges “reasonable prosecutors” would or would not pursue in, say, cases involving criminal abuses of classified information, it is not a special counsel’s job to “exonerate” the subjects of investigation. That’s not the legal standard in our country; you’re not ‘guilty until proven innocent.’
Either there was enough evidence to charge the president with obstruction…or there wasn’t. And for the record, no matter what the president might have said to his staff and former AG Jeff Sessions about the probe, it continued. No one was fired. And POTUS himself even provided written answers to Mueller’s questions.
— The rest is just noise. The facts are thus: There was no collusion because the allegations were false to begin with, and there was no obstruction of justice because the probe continued to its conclusion. (Related: PROOF the “establishment media” was in on “Spygate” plot to overthrow POTUS Trump: DoJ lawyer got bogus “Russia dossier” from Mother Jones reporter.)
Now, who is responsible for this plotting and executing this scheme?
All this said, don’t think for a moment that Democrats and their media cronies won’t try to misconstrue, misrepresent, misreport, and misstate every crumb of information they possibly can ahead of the 2020 general election. That’s because after lying to their voters for two-plus years, they will need to continue living the lie in order to get them to show up at the polls.
We know the garbage media has been in on this from the outset. They have been willing participants in helping to spread the lie daily, and multiple times daily, that Trump is a Manchurian candidate and an agent of the Russian government.
And yet, this could backfire profoundly on Democrats.
Already there are calls — from the president, from his staff, from his allies — to find out who is responsible for launching the operation in the first place. Who helped plan it? Who helped carry it out? Who continues to this day executing portions of the original plan?
“If we’ve learned anything over the past two and half years of RussiaGate, it’s that Democrats will not accept any result short of removing the president from office. No amount of legal exoneration will stop the political witch hunt,” former federal prosecutor Joe diGenova wrote in an op-ed for Fox News. “That’s why we’ve got to start holding the parties behind this outrageous miscarriage of justice accountable.”
Mark Morgan, who worked at the FBI for more than two decades, which included a three year period as the assistant director to the FBI’s training division, also says: “We need to look at how this started. We need to look at the actions of these top leaders.”
Bring on the counterattack, Mr. President.
Read more about the Deep State’s plot to overthrow President Trump at DeepState.news and Trump.news.
Damn, damn Yankees. They ban Kate Smith's 'God Bless America' over 'history of potential racism'
Damn, damn Yankees. They ban Kate Smith's 'God Bless America' over 'history of potential racism'
American singer Kate Smith, who sang a rendition of Irving Berlin’s “God Bless America,” in an undated photo.By Victor Morton
The Damn New York Yankees‘ anti-racism efforts have extended to pulling from their seventh-inning stretch a famous recording of the legendary Kate Smith singing “God Bless America.”
Not because anyone has complained that the song is racist, but because Smith recorded other racially insensitive standards from and during the Jim Crow era.
The Yankees pulled Smith’s “God Bless America” from the rotation at the start of the season, but the New York Daily News reported the reason Thursday — “the Yankees were made aware of Smith’s history of potential racism.”
According to the Daily News, the “potential racism” of which the Yankees were made aware included that she recorded “Pickaninny Heaven,” a jingle about black children where, among other things, they fantasize about “great big watermelons.” She recorded a film clip to promote the song at a black orphanage and, the Daily News reported, “much of the imagery is startlingly racist.”
She also endorsed a “mammy doll” in 1939, which the Daily News said resembles the Aunt Jemima caricature.
Her other recordings included “That’s Why Darkies Were Born,” where the performer sings “someone had to pick the cotton. … That’s why darkies were born.”
That song also was recorded by black activist Paul Robeson and was at the time considered a satirical put-down of racist ideas, albeit using language that would never pass muster now, the Daily News reported.
But the Yankees decided that their post-9/11 tradition of playing “God Bless America” in Smith’s recording had to go anyway.
“The Yankees have been made aware of a recording that had been previously unknown to us and decided to immediately and carefully review this new information,” a club spokesman said. “The Yankees take social, racial and cultural insensitivities very seriously. And while no final conclusions have been made, we are erring on the side of sensitivity.”
The NHL’s Philadelphia Flyers have a decades-old tradition of playing Smith’s rendition of “God Bless America” on special occasions. Smith even performed it live in-person in 1974, before the decisive Game 6 that clinched the team’s first Stanley Cup and a statue of her stands outside the Flyers’ arena.
Go Red Sox.
Trump rips Mueller report: ‘Total bull...t’
Trump rips Mueller report: ‘Total bull...t’
President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump, walk down the stairs of Air Force One during their arrival at Palm Beach International Airport, Thursday, April 18, 2019, in West Palm Beach, Fla. By Bailey Vogt -
President Trump went on a tear Friday morning against special counsel Robert Mueller’s redacted report about Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election, calling it a hoax and referring to some of it as “total bull—t.”
“Statements are made about me by certain people in the Crazy Mueller Report, in itself written by 18 Angry Democrat Trump Haters, which are fabricated & totally untrue. Watch out for people that take so-called ‘notes,’ when the notes never existed until needed,” the president tweeted.
“I never agreed to testify, it was not necessary for me to respond to statements made in the ‘Report’ about me, some of which are total [bull–t] & only given to make the other person look good (or me to look bad). This was an Illegally Started Hoax that never should have happened,” he continued.
The Justice Department released the 448-page redacted report Thursday. Mr. Mueller concluded that Mr. Trump did not conspire with Russia to try to subvert the 2016 election — but the special counsel also said the steps the president took to try to undermine the subsequent investigation into that baseless claim could seem fishy, depending on one’s perspective.
• Stephen Dinan contributed to this article.
Paine’s Advice on Religious Liberty: True Then, True Now
Susan Carleson
“Statements are made about me by certain people in the Crazy Mueller Report, in itself written by 18 Angry Democrat Trump Haters, which are fabricated & totally untrue. Watch out for people that take so-called ‘notes,’ when the notes never existed until needed,” the president tweeted.
“I never agreed to testify, it was not necessary for me to respond to statements made in the ‘Report’ about me, some of which are total [bull–t] & only given to make the other person look good (or me to look bad). This was an Illegally Started Hoax that never should have happened,” he continued.
The Justice Department released the 448-page redacted report Thursday. Mr. Mueller concluded that Mr. Trump did not conspire with Russia to try to subvert the 2016 election — but the special counsel also said the steps the president took to try to undermine the subsequent investigation into that baseless claim could seem fishy, depending on one’s perspective.
• Stephen Dinan contributed to this article.
Paine’s Advice on Religious Liberty: True Then, True Now
Susan Carleson
Source: Enterline Design Services LLC/iStock/Getty Images Plus)Spring in America is a time of treasured religious observances. This year, Christians and Jews celebrate Easter weekend and Passover commencing on Friday, April 19 as Muslims prepare for Ramadan on May 6.
Our freedom of religion, guaranteed by the earliest words in the First Amendment, is assaulted daily by leftists in their thirst for cultural control. God is inconvenient to their hedonistic and oppressive worldview.
In our defense against toxic anti-faith activism, we should turn to a Founding Father widely criticized for his Deist perspective of God - America’s original pamphleteer, Thomas Paine.
A decade ago, the American Civil Rights Union published a unique presentation of Paine’s most powerful writings with commentary by constitutional scholar John Armor. Paine’s wisdom, advised by Armor’s retrospective, provides timely solutions to contemporary attacks on America’s “first freedom.”
Thomas Paine came to America from England in 1774 as dissatisfaction with Britain’s tyranny over the colonies was reaching a boiling point. In January 1776, he published his pamphlet “Common Sense” which made the moral argument for independence and equality under law.
Addressed to “the Inhabitants of America,” its target was people, not institutions.
Paine was America’s foremost religious contrarian. His criticism of institutional religion following the Revolution led to his loss of popularity. But it was his perspective that led to James Madison’s critical wording of the First Amendment. Paine believed individuals, not just religious institutions, should be protected from government intrusion.
Author John Armor explains that for Paine, “the true meaning of freedom of religion is that no religion should be preferred, not that the government should be hostile to religion.” Paine eschewed institutions and embraced worshippers.
Paine believed government had one role as it relates to religion—to stay out of it. Yet today, government power is often harnessed to silence religious liberty, particularly at the local and state level.
President Bill Clinton signed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) in 1993 “to ensure religious freedoms are protected.” A few years later, the Supreme Court ruled that RFRA was an unconstitutional overreach by the federal government but since then, 21 states have passed their own versions of the law.
However, these legislative actions have not protected the faithful from anti-religious activists who manipulate the system for their own ends. Perhaps the best-known case is of bakery owner and Christian, Jack Phillips, of Masterpiece Cake Shop in Colorado. Mr. Phillips welcomes everyone to his bakery, but his religious beliefs preclude him from making cakes that violate his faith. After a gay couple purposefully chose his bakery for an activist test, he was prosecuted by Colorado. In 2018 the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Phillips’ religious liberty.
In response to this ruling, a transsexual activist attorney requested Phillips create a cake which celebrated her gender transition. Phillips again asserted his right to refuse on religious grounds.
In Ohio, a city zoning board amended ordinances to deny expansion of a Christian school. In Anchorage, city officials are suing a Christian shelter serving women who are victims of rape or domestic violence because the operators’ faith prevents them from allowing transgenders who are biologically male to cohabit private space with traumatized females. Chick-fil-A is often blocked from expansion by local activist officials because its founders hold traditional biblical views.
Ironically, the left’s propaganda machine tags these targets with the “discrimination” or “hate group” labels they have deliberately made into substitutional phrases for “religious freedom” within the culture.
Over the past decade, U.S. synagogues, historically Black and other Christian churches have been attacked through arson, bombings and shootings. Christians, Jews and Muslims have been killed within the walls and outside their houses of worship.
As a society, we should be asking some questions - does vilifying religion encourage violence against the faithful? Have anti-faith activists made religious discrimination trendy? Do government entities act for or against our religious freedom?
Tom Paine’s words in the 1770s inspired ordinary people to embrace the fight for liberty with ferocity. Paine believed in a powerful Creator God as the source of “doing justice, loving mercy and endeavoring to make our fellow creatures happy.” Paine believed religious freedom was an individual right that came with an individual responsibility to support the liberty of others. He knew the “United States”—the name he gave our nation—could be a beacon of that freedom for the world.
As Paine writes in Common Sense, “we have it in our power to begin the world over again.” As we enter this most holy season, it is a good time to celebrate religious liberty—one patriot at a time.
This is the first in a series of essays on Thomas Paine and First Amendment freedoms based on the 2009 ACRU publication America—Then and Now in the Words of Tom Paine.
G’ day…Ciao… Helen and Moe Lauzier
Our freedom of religion, guaranteed by the earliest words in the First Amendment, is assaulted daily by leftists in their thirst for cultural control. God is inconvenient to their hedonistic and oppressive worldview.
In our defense against toxic anti-faith activism, we should turn to a Founding Father widely criticized for his Deist perspective of God - America’s original pamphleteer, Thomas Paine.
A decade ago, the American Civil Rights Union published a unique presentation of Paine’s most powerful writings with commentary by constitutional scholar John Armor. Paine’s wisdom, advised by Armor’s retrospective, provides timely solutions to contemporary attacks on America’s “first freedom.”
Thomas Paine came to America from England in 1774 as dissatisfaction with Britain’s tyranny over the colonies was reaching a boiling point. In January 1776, he published his pamphlet “Common Sense” which made the moral argument for independence and equality under law.
Addressed to “the Inhabitants of America,” its target was people, not institutions.
Paine was America’s foremost religious contrarian. His criticism of institutional religion following the Revolution led to his loss of popularity. But it was his perspective that led to James Madison’s critical wording of the First Amendment. Paine believed individuals, not just religious institutions, should be protected from government intrusion.
Author John Armor explains that for Paine, “the true meaning of freedom of religion is that no religion should be preferred, not that the government should be hostile to religion.” Paine eschewed institutions and embraced worshippers.
Paine believed government had one role as it relates to religion—to stay out of it. Yet today, government power is often harnessed to silence religious liberty, particularly at the local and state level.
President Bill Clinton signed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) in 1993 “to ensure religious freedoms are protected.” A few years later, the Supreme Court ruled that RFRA was an unconstitutional overreach by the federal government but since then, 21 states have passed their own versions of the law.
However, these legislative actions have not protected the faithful from anti-religious activists who manipulate the system for their own ends. Perhaps the best-known case is of bakery owner and Christian, Jack Phillips, of Masterpiece Cake Shop in Colorado. Mr. Phillips welcomes everyone to his bakery, but his religious beliefs preclude him from making cakes that violate his faith. After a gay couple purposefully chose his bakery for an activist test, he was prosecuted by Colorado. In 2018 the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Phillips’ religious liberty.
In response to this ruling, a transsexual activist attorney requested Phillips create a cake which celebrated her gender transition. Phillips again asserted his right to refuse on religious grounds.
In Ohio, a city zoning board amended ordinances to deny expansion of a Christian school. In Anchorage, city officials are suing a Christian shelter serving women who are victims of rape or domestic violence because the operators’ faith prevents them from allowing transgenders who are biologically male to cohabit private space with traumatized females. Chick-fil-A is often blocked from expansion by local activist officials because its founders hold traditional biblical views.
Ironically, the left’s propaganda machine tags these targets with the “discrimination” or “hate group” labels they have deliberately made into substitutional phrases for “religious freedom” within the culture.
Over the past decade, U.S. synagogues, historically Black and other Christian churches have been attacked through arson, bombings and shootings. Christians, Jews and Muslims have been killed within the walls and outside their houses of worship.
As a society, we should be asking some questions - does vilifying religion encourage violence against the faithful? Have anti-faith activists made religious discrimination trendy? Do government entities act for or against our religious freedom?
Tom Paine’s words in the 1770s inspired ordinary people to embrace the fight for liberty with ferocity. Paine believed in a powerful Creator God as the source of “doing justice, loving mercy and endeavoring to make our fellow creatures happy.” Paine believed religious freedom was an individual right that came with an individual responsibility to support the liberty of others. He knew the “United States”—the name he gave our nation—could be a beacon of that freedom for the world.
As Paine writes in Common Sense, “we have it in our power to begin the world over again.” As we enter this most holy season, it is a good time to celebrate religious liberty—one patriot at a time.
This is the first in a series of essays on Thomas Paine and First Amendment freedoms based on the 2009 ACRU publication America—Then and Now in the Words of Tom Paine.
G’ day…Ciao… Helen and Moe LauzierThus articles
that is all articles
This time, hopefully can provide benefits to you all. Okay, see you in another article post.
You are now reading the article the link address https://fairyforreference.blogspot.com/2019/04/www_19.html
0 Response to " "
Post a Comment