Title :
link :
WWW.MOEISSUESOFTHEDAY.BLOGSPOT.COM
April 19, 2019
All Gave Some~Some Gave All
*****
#NoCollusion: Media Can’t Handle The Truth
by Nina Bookout
The majority of the mainstream media has been all in against Trump since he first announced he was running. They ramped up their animosity to eleventy when he was elected. They’ve been salivating for two years over the thought that Mueller would find obstruction and collusion. Today Attorney General William Barr emphatically said there was absolutely ZERO collusion by Trump, Trump associates, or any Americans. That truth has sent the media into a collective tantrum.
How many times did Barr emphasize no collusion and no obstruction? I lost count. But, as you can see above or read below, he was blunt in his assessment of the Mueller Report.
“As you know, one of the primary purposes of the Special Counsel’s investigation was to determine whether members of the presidential campaign of Donald J. Trump, or any individuals associated with that campaign, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election. Volume I of the Special Counsel’s report describes the results of that investigation. As you will see, the Special Counsel’s report states that his “investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”
I am sure that all Americans share my concerns about the efforts of the Russian government to interfere in our presidential election. As the Special Counsel’s report makes clear, the Russian government sought to interfere in our election. But thanks to the Special Counsel’s thorough investigation, we now know that the Russian operatives who perpetrated these schemes did not have the cooperation of President Trump or the Trump campaign – or the knowing assistance of any other Americans for that matter. That is something that all Americans can and should be grateful to have confirmed.” [Emphasis Added]
I am sure that all Americans share my concerns about the efforts of the Russian government to interfere in our presidential election. As the Special Counsel’s report makes clear, the Russian government sought to interfere in our election. But thanks to the Special Counsel’s thorough investigation, we now know that the Russian operatives who perpetrated these schemes did not have the cooperation of President Trump or the Trump campaign – or the knowing assistance of any other Americans for that matter. That is something that all Americans can and should be grateful to have confirmed.” [Emphasis Added]
In watching the press conference, one can literally see and feel the media tantrums begin. WaPo’s Aaron Blake must’ve had this ready to go before the press conference started.
“In a lengthy opening statement, Barr found just about every way possible to say that there was no coordination, cooperation or conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia. He also said Trump was right about “no collusion,” expanding the Mueller report’s clearing of Trump to a more nebulous term with little legal significance.
But perhaps more importantly, on obstruction of justice, he seemed to go to bat for Trump personally, offering a sympathetic take on the president’s state of mind and cooperation.”
But perhaps more importantly, on obstruction of justice, he seemed to go to bat for Trump personally, offering a sympathetic take on the president’s state of mind and cooperation.”
Oh for Pete’s sake. Get a grip. Barr was blunt and matter of fact in his statement. But sure! Let’s spin it in such a way as to protect your PRECIOUS!
CNN’s Brian Stelter is not a happy camper. He wanted everyone to pay attention to what the report actually says, not what partisans try to tell us it says. Umm dude? LOOK IN THE MIRROR!
Trump outrage at support for ‘executing babies’ driving new anti-abortion campaign
Trump outrage at support for ‘executing babies’ driving new anti-abortion campaign
by Paul Bedard
The White House is considering new legal limits on abortion in a drive sparked by President Trump’s shock at support in Virginia and New York for after-birth abortion, one of the practices shown in the movie “Gosnell” screened at the White House late Friday.
To an overflow crowd of White House staff and anti-abortion advocates, including the journalist who led the coverage of Philadelphia abortionist Kermit Gosnell, a top Trump aide said that the administration is constantly looking for ways to curb abortion.
The issue flooded into the public view after Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam was asked about pending legislation to allow very late-term abortions.
Northam, a pediatric surgeon, explained to WTOP that sometimes third trimester abortions are done in cases where the fetus might be “nonviable.” He said, “The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that's what the mother and the family desired. And then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”
After the screening of Gosnell: The Trial of America's Biggest Serial Killer, which covers the 2013 trial and murder conviction of the abortionist, insiders said that Domestic Policy Advisor Joe Grogan told of how Trump was “incredulous” over Northam’s comments.
“He said that Trump was really impacted by that. He couldn’t believe it,” said one, adding, “They come in every day and look at how they can legally stop abortion.”
Trump stepped up his anger after Democrats expressed opposition to the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act. He tweeted, “Senate Democrats just voted against legislation to prevent the killing of newborn infant children. The Democrat position on abortion is now so extreme that they don’t mind executing babies AFTER birth....”
The president’s reaction to Northam “had a lot to do” with Gosnell being screened, said one of the dozens of attendees at the Friday night event.
While Trump did not attend the Gosnell movie screening in the large auditorium in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, having the movie show inside the complex was a huge sign of support for the pro-life movement. Many in the movement have described Trump as the most pro-life president ever.
The event lasted about five hours and included the screening, a Q&A with Grogan and Ann McElhinney, who made the movie with her husband Phelim McAleer.
One attendee saw symbolism in the choice of rooms. “I think they were trying to send a message with the afterwards reception. It was in the Secretary of War offices,” the attendee said.
After the event broke up, McElhinney and McAleer had a chance encounter with Trump at the Trump International Hotel where he had dined with first lady Melania Trump.
Nominating Sanders would require either a Romney-esque flip on immigration, or dispiriting the Democratic base on the issue that largely defines and fuels their opposition to Trump.
By Warren Henry
By Warren Henry
According to The New York Times, “mainstream Democrats are increasingly worried that their effort to defeat President Trump in 2020 could be complicated by [Bernie] Sanders, in a political scenario all too reminiscent of how Mr. Trump himself seized the Republican nomination in 2016.” Sanders pays lip service to the idea of unity, but has warned supporters he is also fighting establishment Democrats.
Bernie is embroiled in a bitter feud with Clinton loyalists at the Center for American Progress (CAP), which has been criticizing the socialist’s Medicare-for-All proposal behind the scenes. (There is little question where the Times stands in this battle; its hit piece uses CAP President Neera Tanden’s 78-year-old mother to attack her.)
The “Stop Sanders” Democrats will turn out to be as ineffectual as NeverTrump Republicans were in 2016 unless they find a line of attack that is not simply a grievance of the party’s establishment. Sanders supporters are about as likely to ditch Bernie over his millionaire status as Trump supporters were affected by the bankruptcies in his business past. Nor are they likely to care about the details of his single-payer health-care bill. But once Bernie’s opponents understand the roots of his success, they may find a potent issue staring them in the face.
There are two major reasons Sanders is near the Democrats’ center of gravity. First, his socialism (or “socialism“) largely expresses a vision Democrats have held for at least 50 years and often longer. Second, because his vision is old, it remains rooted in class, rather than the identity politics of the New New Left. For some, this second reason is a feature; for others, it is a bug.
The potential fault line for Sanders among Democrats may be his position on immigration:
The Hill ✔ @thehillSen. Bernie Sanders campaigns in Oskaloosa, IA: "If you open the borders, there's a lot of poverty in this world, and you're going to have people from all over the world. And I don't think that's something that we can do at this point. Can't do it."
Bernie’s stance against open borders is not where many Democrats are now, especially young progressives and democratic socialists like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez:
The Hill ✔ @thehillRep. @AOC: "I think 'Abolish ICE' is a call to action on several levels. One is the literal interpretation of all abolishing ICE, which I support...I don't believe that an agency that systematically & repeatedly violates human rights -- I don't think that agency can be reformed."
Granted, the woke are as over-hyped as the “Stop Sanders” types are likely to be. But the younger, woker set is likely to be a key component of Bernie’s coalition.
(((Harry Enten))) ✔ @ForecasterEntenPer HarrisX, Generation (aka age) is THE divide in the Dem primary right now. This is an average of the last few days... Bernie Sanders has got the young and Joe Biden has got the old. (Note other polls confirm this.)
Moreover, the open borders position is held more broadly among Democratic leadership. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has repeatedly called a border wall “immoral.” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has called the wall “medieval.”
It is obvious to anyone paying attention that Democrats’ newfound extremism against border security is a reaction to President Trump, who made it his signature issue in 2016. More than any other subject (excepting possibly “Russiagate”), Trump’s immigration policies embody the personal qualities Democrats loathe about Trump.
For Democrats, Trump’s determination to secure our border and crack down on illegal immigration represent his racism, nativism, Islamophobia, and general cruelty. His immigration policies outrage the party faithful, and none more than those marinating in left-wing identity politics.
Viewing the 2020 campaign from this perspective, the Democrats nominating Sanders would be not unlike Republicans nominating Mitt Romney in 2012. The GOP suffered steep losses in 2008, but roared back to reclaim Congress in 2010 based on widespread opposition to Obamacare. Having championed a mandate-based health system as governor of Massachusetts, Romney was effectively neutered on this key issue, dampening partisan enthusiasm for his candidacy. Nominating Sanders would require either a Romney-esque flip on immigration, or dispiriting the Democratic base on the issue that largely defines and fuels their opposition to Trump.
Sanders can try to spin his immigration position as a feature rather than a bug. Republicans tend to win on immigration when the question is whether America should have borders and enforce them. Democrats tend to gain when the issue becomes what to do about those who have already crossed into our country illegally (e.g., family separation, a path to citizenship, etc.)
By rejecting open borders, a Sanders-Trump debate would play out on more Democratic turf. Sanders might also argue that his position is a better fit to attract Obama-Trump voters in the Rust Belt and Midwestern states Hillary Clinton lost.
This will be a difficult sell, however, to Democrats who have elevated the notion of open borders to a moral principle. Again, the parallel to the right’s attitudes regarding Obamacare is instructive.
When each party base has lacked the power to enact legislation, it has been easy to embrace maximalist positions. Tea Party Republicans generally sought to repeal Obamacare without consensus about a replacement. Progressives and socialists want to abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement and tear down the wall we already have.
Only after a party gains effective control of the government do political realities intrude. It is a psychology that does not aid Sanders in winning the Democratic nomination, let alone a general election.
There is no guarantee the neoliberals and woke identitarians can deny Sanders the Democratic nomination by putting him in a vise on immigration. After all, Romney did win the GOP nod in 2012, despite his weakness on Obamacare. But Bernie’s opponents have failed to come up with a better idea so far.
Warren Henry is the nom de plume of an attorney practicing in the State of Illinois.
Greenland Glacier Grows, Despite Al Gore's Claims of Melting Glaciers
Greenland Glacier Grows, Despite Al Gore's Claims of Melting Glaciers
If one were to have believed Al Gore over the past twenty years, one would think that ol’ Mother earth were like the Wicked Witch of the West in “The Wizard of Oz,” that the planet is screaming, “I’m melting! Mellllting!” and bemoaning its destruction because of man’s uncaring use of energy-packed fossil fuels.
But another scientific study has appeared that throws cold water on Gore’s scaremongering and makes Gore look much more like the charlatan Wizard than the Scarecrow who really had a brain.
As James Murphy writes for The New American, the journal Nature Geoscience just released another study showing that the “glacial melting” narrative is unsupportable. The Jakobshavn Glacier in Greenland is growing not melting.
Using airborne altimetry and satellite imagery data, the study concludes that since 2016, the glacier has been advancing. The data used was from NASA’s Oceans Melting Greenland (OMG) mission. The study was conducted by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) with contributions from Remote Sensing Solutions in Barnstable, Massachusetts, and the University of Utrecht in the Netherlands.
But this runs counter to the fatiguing and seemingly endless mythology Gore constructed as part of his attempt to lever more control over private business and consumer choice, and to extract more tax money from human activity.
When the ever-lovable “journalist” Katie Couric asked him in 2006 whether “anthropogenic climate change” would put Manhattan underwater, he replied:
Yes, in fact the World Trade Center Memorial site would be underwater.
And in 2010, long after he’d reached that great scientific conclusion, he backed up his earlier claims with:
Almost all of the ice-covered regions of the Earth are melting — and seas are rising.
Not only were both parts of that statement unsupportable at the time, they still are unsupportable.
Robert Felix covered the falsity of Gore’s excessive blathering at the time, writing for CanadaFreePress:
If you click on the words ‘are melting’ in Gore’s article, you’re taken to a paper by Michael Zemp at the University of Zurich. Mr. Zemp begins his paper by warning that’“glaciers around the globe continue to melt at high rates’… However, if you bother to actually read the paper, you learn that Zemp’s conclusion is based on measurements of ‘more than 80 glaciers.’
And, Felix notes:
But another scientific study has appeared that throws cold water on Gore’s scaremongering and makes Gore look much more like the charlatan Wizard than the Scarecrow who really had a brain.
As James Murphy writes for The New American, the journal Nature Geoscience just released another study showing that the “glacial melting” narrative is unsupportable. The Jakobshavn Glacier in Greenland is growing not melting.
Using airborne altimetry and satellite imagery data, the study concludes that since 2016, the glacier has been advancing. The data used was from NASA’s Oceans Melting Greenland (OMG) mission. The study was conducted by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) with contributions from Remote Sensing Solutions in Barnstable, Massachusetts, and the University of Utrecht in the Netherlands.
But this runs counter to the fatiguing and seemingly endless mythology Gore constructed as part of his attempt to lever more control over private business and consumer choice, and to extract more tax money from human activity.
When the ever-lovable “journalist” Katie Couric asked him in 2006 whether “anthropogenic climate change” would put Manhattan underwater, he replied:
Yes, in fact the World Trade Center Memorial site would be underwater.
And in 2010, long after he’d reached that great scientific conclusion, he backed up his earlier claims with:
Almost all of the ice-covered regions of the Earth are melting — and seas are rising.
Not only were both parts of that statement unsupportable at the time, they still are unsupportable.
Robert Felix covered the falsity of Gore’s excessive blathering at the time, writing for CanadaFreePress:
If you click on the words ‘are melting’ in Gore’s article, you’re taken to a paper by Michael Zemp at the University of Zurich. Mr. Zemp begins his paper by warning that’“glaciers around the globe continue to melt at high rates’… However, if you bother to actually read the paper, you learn that Zemp’s conclusion is based on measurements of ‘more than 80 glaciers.’
And, Felix notes:
Considering that the Himalayas boast more than 15,000 glaciers, a study of ‘more than 80 glaciers’ hardly seems sufficient to warrant such a catastrophic pronouncement… Especially when you learn that of those 80 glaciers, several are growing… Growing. Not melting.
Now, to be magnanimous to Gore, glaciers expand and contract as much as self-conscious movie stars on fad diets. But these are natural cycles, natural cycles that should not be used to give false impressions in the service of passing political mandates over other people's’ lives.
As Murphy writes about this new glacial expansion:
The study traces the glacier’s growth spurt to a naturally occurring cycle of cooler water in the North Atlantic more than 600 miles south of the glacier. Researchers posit that the cold water was set in motion due to an effect known as the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), which causes the Northern Atlantic to switch slowly between warm and cold every five to 20 years.
Likewise, the factor with the closest correlation to global temperature changes on Earth is not man, as Gore claims. It’s the Sun, and this has been known for decades, at least as long as Fred Singer and Dennis Avery’s excellent book, “Unstoppable Global Warming Every 1,500 Years” has been available for people like Gore to assiduously avoid – and for him to avoid mentioning to the public.
It’s not likely Gore will mention this new information, either.
But it’s worth noting, as are all of Gore’s sundry Chicken Little claims about anthropogenic climate change that were probably disconnected from reality at the time, and are being proven even more unreal today.
In this world of politicized science to promote “Climate Change”, of sketchy data, and political charlatans spouting nonsense, pop media can’t be expected to call Gore on his errors. But we can, and we can show others that his claims melt quite rapidly when exposed to the light of truth.
Trump Takes The Gloves Off Against Cuba, Venezuela, And Nicaragua
By Dick Morris
National Security Advisor John Bolton announced yesterday strong measures against the three dictatorships that are exporting terror, starvation, and socialism in our Hemisphere. The new axis of evil begins in Havana and spreads out to Caracas and Managua.
National Security Advisor John Bolton announced yesterday strong measures against the three dictatorships that are exporting terror, starvation, and socialism in our Hemisphere. The new axis of evil begins in Havana and spreads out to Caracas and Managua.
Among the measures Bolton announced are:
• A limit on remittances that Americans can Send Home to their families in Cuba of $1,000 per quarter per person. Americans currently send $3 billion a year to Cuba, a full five percent of the island’s GDP
• New restrictions on American travel to Cuba. While the nature of the limitation was not immediately clear, the US should ban Cruise ships from stopping in Cuba if they also stop in the U.S.
• Allowing lawsuits against foreign firms operating on properties Cuba seized from Americans after the 1959 revolution. The US has already certified 6,000 claims as having merit, potentially totaling $8 billion in damages. The targets include foreign companies that have been operating out of hotels, tobacco factories, distilleries and other properties nationalized by Castro.
• Sanctioning the Venezuelan national bank.
• Sanctioning Bancorp, which Bolton says is runs a “slush fund” for Nicaragua’s dictator Daniel Ortega.
Bolton condemned the three nations as the “troika of tyranny” noting that Cuba has “trained Venezuelan security forces to repress civilians and support Maduro” who he called “a Cuban puppet.”
Russia and China have moved in to try to support Maduro and keep him in power to counter Washington. Russia recently deployed a hundred soldiers to Venezuela and China has lent the nation a reported $50 billion since 2007.
The US and the insurgent president of Venezuela, who we recognize, Juan Guaido, should warn Beijing that he will not honor debts incurred by Chavez or Maduro to China. He should note, for example, that Poland unilaterally refused to repay Russia for its loans to Warsaw during the communist period.
The Trump Administration measures strike at the heart of the tyranny that is spreading throughout the hemisphere emanating from Havana. Coupled with earlier sanctions recently imposed on vessels carrying oil to Cuba, these actions herald a new day in Washington-Havana relations, reversing the thaw that Obama encouraged until Cuba stops bolstering tyrannies in other parts of Latin America. It is welcome, indeed.
The Monroe Doctrine never shined brighter.
As Murphy writes about this new glacial expansion:
The study traces the glacier’s growth spurt to a naturally occurring cycle of cooler water in the North Atlantic more than 600 miles south of the glacier. Researchers posit that the cold water was set in motion due to an effect known as the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), which causes the Northern Atlantic to switch slowly between warm and cold every five to 20 years.
Likewise, the factor with the closest correlation to global temperature changes on Earth is not man, as Gore claims. It’s the Sun, and this has been known for decades, at least as long as Fred Singer and Dennis Avery’s excellent book, “Unstoppable Global Warming Every 1,500 Years” has been available for people like Gore to assiduously avoid – and for him to avoid mentioning to the public.
It’s not likely Gore will mention this new information, either.
But it’s worth noting, as are all of Gore’s sundry Chicken Little claims about anthropogenic climate change that were probably disconnected from reality at the time, and are being proven even more unreal today.
In this world of politicized science to promote “Climate Change”, of sketchy data, and political charlatans spouting nonsense, pop media can’t be expected to call Gore on his errors. But we can, and we can show others that his claims melt quite rapidly when exposed to the light of truth.
Trump Takes The Gloves Off Against Cuba, Venezuela, And Nicaragua
By Dick Morris
National Security Advisor John Bolton announced yesterday strong measures against the three dictatorships that are exporting terror, starvation, and socialism in our Hemisphere. The new axis of evil begins in Havana and spreads out to Caracas and Managua.National Security Advisor John Bolton announced yesterday strong measures against the three dictatorships that are exporting terror, starvation, and socialism in our Hemisphere. The new axis of evil begins in Havana and spreads out to Caracas and Managua.
Among the measures Bolton announced are:
• A limit on remittances that Americans can Send Home to their families in Cuba of $1,000 per quarter per person. Americans currently send $3 billion a year to Cuba, a full five percent of the island’s GDP
• New restrictions on American travel to Cuba. While the nature of the limitation was not immediately clear, the US should ban Cruise ships from stopping in Cuba if they also stop in the U.S.
• Allowing lawsuits against foreign firms operating on properties Cuba seized from Americans after the 1959 revolution. The US has already certified 6,000 claims as having merit, potentially totaling $8 billion in damages. The targets include foreign companies that have been operating out of hotels, tobacco factories, distilleries and other properties nationalized by Castro.
• Sanctioning the Venezuelan national bank.
• Sanctioning Bancorp, which Bolton says is runs a “slush fund” for Nicaragua’s dictator Daniel Ortega.
Bolton condemned the three nations as the “troika of tyranny” noting that Cuba has “trained Venezuelan security forces to repress civilians and support Maduro” who he called “a Cuban puppet.”
Russia and China have moved in to try to support Maduro and keep him in power to counter Washington. Russia recently deployed a hundred soldiers to Venezuela and China has lent the nation a reported $50 billion since 2007.
The US and the insurgent president of Venezuela, who we recognize, Juan Guaido, should warn Beijing that he will not honor debts incurred by Chavez or Maduro to China. He should note, for example, that Poland unilaterally refused to repay Russia for its loans to Warsaw during the communist period.
The Trump Administration measures strike at the heart of the tyranny that is spreading throughout the hemisphere emanating from Havana. Coupled with earlier sanctions recently imposed on vessels carrying oil to Cuba, these actions herald a new day in Washington-Havana relations, reversing the thaw that Obama encouraged until Cuba stops bolstering tyrannies in other parts of Latin America. It is welcome, indeed.
The Monroe Doctrine never shined brighter.
-
The Scale of Things
One of the most interesting sections in the book of 'Guinness World. Records' was always the one that held the records for the world's largest things!!!
However, there are actually a lot of things in our world that are far bigger in reality than most people would expect.
Scrolling Down to see the full scale of different things: -
1. This is a giant leatherback sea turtle. They grow up to 7 feet long and 2,000 pounds
2. How many Earths would be able to fit inside the Sun? 1.3 million
Earths.
3. Here's an average-sized giant African land snail
4. I had no idea an eagle talon was so enormous
!
5. The size of an average blue whale's heart.
6. The Titanic in a comparison with a modern cruise liner.
7. Quetzalcoatlus Northropi - the largest flying animal to ever live.
8. A pair of fully-inflated horse lungs.
9. This is how big a moose really is.
.
11. Nice to meet you!
12. Some road signs really are that huge
!
13. This saltwater crocodile is a colossus!
14. The view from Earth if our moon was replaced by Saturn.
16 The terrifying size of a gorilla's hand.
17 Standing beside a single wind turbine blade.
18.Comparing a comet to the city of LA.
19. Here's a giant oceanic manta ray. Scary!
20. Here's how big the USA is in comparison with the moon
Helen and Moe Lauzier
Thus articles
that is all articles
This time, hopefully can provide benefits to you all. Okay, see you in another article post.
You are now reading the article the link address https://fairyforreference.blogspot.com/2019/04/www_18.html
0 Response to " "
Post a Comment