Title :
link :
Grand daughter strikes again... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19-MMGKpPAo&feature=push-u-sub&attr_tag=H7JH7ajzhcCi_IrM%3A6
WWW.MOEISSUESOFTHEDAY.
BLOGOESPOT.COM
Monday, Dec. 10, 2018
All Gave Some~Some Gave All
*****
Macron, le maudit cochon…
Helen says I’m insulting pigs.
Award-Winning Investigative Reporter Sharyl Attkisson: Comey’s Testimony Proves FBI Investigation Into Hillary’s Email Scandal was ‘Tainted by Bias’
ANALYSIS/OPINION:
Investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson is doing something most journalists (and apparently most Senators) have failed to do. She’s actually reading reading the entire Inspector General’s report on the FBI’s handling of the Hillary Clinton email affair.
For those journalists who have only read the Executive Summary of Michael Horowitz’ report they come away with assumptions that serve their political purposes, but don’t actually reflect the contents of the extensive tome. “There were only a handful of agents implicated” they’ll say. And “there was no political bias in the agency’s handling of the investigations” they’ll maintain.
Not so, says Attkisson.
Attkisson: And one more headline I don’t think was well discussed … I counted, I think so far as I’m going through the report, pretty harsh criticism of over 80 FBI officials and DOJ officials, meaning this wasn’t a handful of people, just a few people, these are very top level people and a lot of attorneys and people around them and ethics officials who are criticized. This was pretty wide spread according to the Inspector General.
O’Connor: Wow. That is … I haven’t seen that tally at all, 80 various officials within the FBI that sounds like a systemic problem.
Attkisson: And they weren’t all named…he would say things like 39 people on this conference call all failed to act on this such and such or he would say a number of attorneys and ethics officials made this mistake. So he’s not naming them all, but he’s identifying a number of people and I’ve been trying to add them up to the best of my ability.
'Presidential harassment': Trump under unprecedented attack on multiple fronts
By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times
Rep. Adam B. Schiff joined House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, a fellow California Democrat, at a rally last year. Mr. Schiff will be given unilateral subpoena power in January and has promised renewed vigor in investigating President Trump. (Associated Press/File)Everywhere President Trump looks, there are Democrats targeting him, from New York to Washington to Maryland, in the positions of lawmakers, prosecutors, state attorneys general, opposition researchers, bureaucrats and activist defense lawyers.
They are aiming at Russia collusion, the Trump Organization, the Trump Foundation, a Trump hotel, Trump tax returns, Trump campaign finances and supposed money laundering.
“The relentless assaults on this president from every front were previously unimaginable and absolutely unprecedented,” said Sidney Powell, a Texas appeals attorney whose book, “License to Lie,” takes on Justice Department corruption. “The ‘resistance’ has sunk to a new low which I hope they live to regret. They truly became ‘creeps on a mission to destroy the President.’”
Mr. Trump tweeted Thursday, “It’s called Presidential Harassment!”
All the while, what conservatives consider the most hostile press toward a president in modern times has fed the Russia collusion flames with hundreds of stories — some of them bogus. The right-leaning Media Research Center analyzed NBC, ABC and CBS evening newscasts and found that 90 percent of their Trump stories were negative.
Last week, NPR stepped back from a report that Donald Trump Jr. misled Congress in his testimony on an aborted Russian hotel deal. WikiLeaks and Paul Manafort emphatically denied an unconfirmed Guardian newspaper report that the former Trump campaign manager met with Julian Assange in London three times. WikiLeaks published Democratic Party emails stolen by Russian intelligence officers.
The network of Democrats and Democrat-aligned forces going after Mr. Trump is widespread and well-funded. It includes:
• Special counsel Robert Mueller’s team. The conservative press has documented the Democratic donors on Mr. Mueller’s staff. Often mentioned is Andrew Weissmann, a Democratic contributor and cheerleader of the resistance inside the Justice Department. He attended what was supposed to be Hillary Clinton’s presidential victory party in New York.
Jeannie Rhee, another lead prosecutor, represented the Clinton Foundation as well as Mrs. Clinton in lawsuits. Inside the Justice Department, she was an adviser to former Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., a partisan Trump critic who is mulling a presidential run.
Conservatives say Ms. Rhee’s background should be treated as a conflict of interest because much of the investigation deals with how Russia tried to sabotage the Clinton campaign and whether the Trump team helped.
Conservatives say there is another conflict: The FBI has relied on Clinton-financed opposition research known as the dossier.
Conservatives say there is another conflict: The FBI has relied on Clinton-financed opposition research known as the dossier.
Ms. Rhee has donated $16,000 to Democrats since 2008, Federal Election Commission records show. She gave the maximum $5,400 to Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign in the 2015-16 election cycle.
• Rep. Adam B. Schiff. With unilateral subpoena power, the California Democrat in January takes over the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. He has been a big booster of the dossier compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele. His work on the dossier was financed by the Democratic National Committee as well as Mrs. Clinton’s team.
Mr. Schiff has promised renewed vigor in investigating Mr. Trump. His agenda includes inquiries into whether Russian money was laundered through the Trump Organization. He will also look again at Russian collusion, for which the Republican majority exonerated the Trump campaign. Other incoming House Democratic chairmen also plan committee inquiries of Mr. Trump, including subpoenas.
• Τhe U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan. Mr. Mueller farmed out to New York the politically sensitive job of investigating Mr. Trump’s personal attorney, Michael Cohen. Prosecutors have dived in, with senior prosecutor Thomas McKay criticizing the president in court.
Mr. McKay worked under then-U.S. attorney Preet Bharara, a former legal aide to Sen. Charles E. Schumer, New York Democrat. Mr. Bharara refused to resign after thinking he had a deal to stay. Mr. Trump fired him in March 2017 and appointed a new U.S. attorney, who recused himself from the Cohen case.
Mr. Cohen pleaded guilty to tax evasion and violating campaign finance laws. He paid two women hush money that came from Mr. Trump, which in effect makes the president a participant in what federal officials said was an illegal deal.
Mr. Trump’s attorneys argue that the nondisclosure agreement was private, not an in-kind campaign donation. If it is a campaign donation, they say, it is legal because candidates can donate unlimited funds to their own campaigns.
• New York Attorney General Barbara D. Underwood. The Democrat has gone to war against Mr. Trump and his family. She filed suit in June accusing the Donald J. Trump Foundation of “extensive and persistent violations of state and federal law.” She is seeking $2.8 million in restitution.
She called on the Internal Revenue Service and Federal Election Commission to also go after the Trump family. She named directors Donald Trump Jr.; Ivanka Trump; and Eric Trump. She said Mr. Trump used the charity’s money to pay off legal obligations, promote Trump hotels and purchase personal items.
Trump attorney Alan S. Futerfas filed a memo in New York Supreme Court rejecting the charges. He accused the attorney general of carrying out a political vendetta begun by Eric Schneiderman, who resigned in May over allegations that he abused a woman. Mr. Schneiderman was an adviser to the failed Clinton campaign.
“The NYAG himself — the head of the entity that brought this petition — solicited financial donations to his own campaign for re-election based on his promise to ‘lead the resistance’ and attack the president and his policies, describing the president as out to ‘hurt’ New Yorkers,” Mr. Futerfas said. “The NYAG, as an entity, has issued scores of press releases trumpeting its fight against the president.”
• New York State Department of Taxation and Finance. Former Trump attorney Cohen, who is cooperating with Mr. Mueller and the U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan, has met with state tax bureaucrats, according to his attorney’s court filing. Attorney Guy Petrillo said Mr. Cohen began cooperating after his guilty plea, suggesting that the focus is on Trump taxes. The taxation and finance department is part of Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo’s administration.
Mr. Cohen “has cooperated personally and through counsel and tax professionals with requests for information,” his court filing says.
The FBI raided Mr. Cohen’s files this summer and collected reams of documents related to the Trump Organization. Mr. Cohen pleaded guilty to tax invasion by hiding income from his private taxicab business.
• Maryland Attorney General Brian E. Frosh. The Democrat issued sweeping subpoenas for all sorts of Trump business records, including his Trump International Hotel in the District of Columbia.
Maryland and the D.C. city government have filed suit claiming the president is violating the Constitution’s emoluments clause by profiting from foreign officials who stay in his hotels. The Trump Organization says it identifies profits from such guests and donates them to the U.S. Treasury.
Mr. Frosh has filed additional lawsuits, such as challenging Mr. Trump’s appointment of an acting attorney general.
• Lanny Davis. The longtime Bill and Hillary Clinton loyalist is one of Mr. Cohen’s attorneys. He is active on the public relations front. He initially told reporters that Mr. Cohen testified that Mr. Trump was aware of the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting with a Russian lawyer. Mr. Davis later retracted the claim.
Mr. Davis wrote a book suggesting that Congress consider removing Mr. Trump under the 25th Amendment because, the author argues, he is mentally incapacitated. In October, Mr. Davis announced that Mr. Cohen left the Republican Party and re-registered as a Democrat. Mr. Cohen says his campaign finance violations (paying money to two women) were the result of misplaced loyalty to Mr. Trump.
• Michael Avenatti. The brash trial lawyer entered the political arena by taking up the cause of porn actress Stormy Daniels. The actress, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, is one of two women who claim to have had affairs with Mr. Trump years ago. Mr. Cohen facilitated a $130,000 payment to Ms. Clifford, which he said came from the president.
Mr. Avenatti sued Mr. Trump for defamation against his client and lost, meaning Ms. Clifford is liable for Mr. Trump’s six-figure legal bill. A separate lawsuit concerns the validity of the nondisclosure agreement for which Mr. Avenatti wants court-ordered depositions.
USA Today called the Clifford-Avenatti duo “a leading force of resistance against the president.”
Also on the legal front, the American Civil Liberties Union sued Mr. Trump over 100 times in his first 10 months in office, Business Insider estimated.
• Mr. Bharara. From the sidelines, the former New York prosecutor is an active anti-Trumper on Twitter. In October, he suggested that Mr. Trump would activate a presidential alert system to go after his political enemies.
“Serious question — what law prevents abuse of this new Presidential Alert? What law prevents POTUS from using it to attack a rival or promote himself?” he asked.
Some Democrats pushed him to seek the New York vacant attorney general job to go after Mr. Trump’s years of business in Manhattan. Liberal Vox.com called him a “leading voice of the opposition.”
At Vanity Fair’s 2017 “New Establishment Summit,” Mr. Bharara criticized Mr. Trump’s stand against illegal immigration and a ban on entry from some Muslim nations.
“I was born in India,” he said. “I’m going to try not to get deported.”
Mr. Bharara is among a cadre of former Barack Obama Justice Department officials who are on a mission to defeat Mr. Trump. They include Mr. Holder and former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates. She defied Mr. Trump’s Muslim ban order, to the cheers of Mr. Weissmann via an email disclosed by Judicial Watch.
• Daniel Jones. A former senior staffer to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat, Mr. Jones established the secretive investigative firm Penn Quarter Group. He met with the FBI last year and said he had raised $50 million from wealthy donors to investigate Trump-Russia connections, according to a bureau document. He said he hired Mr. Steele and Fusion GPS, which originally handled the former spy. Mr. Steele told a Justice Department contact that he was “desperate” to destroy Trump, according to an FBI document.
“In a saner world, there’d be no need to wait for Mueller,” said a Twitter post by Jonathan Rauch, an activist journalist and gay rights advocate at the Brookings Institution. “Nothing he finds will be worse than what we already know: this POTUS was elected and serves in violation of his oath of office. Pity we need prosecutors to tell us that.”
“President has accomplished more to benefit middle-class Americans than the last two or three previous administrations combined,” she said.
“Imagine what he could have done if he had not been hamstrung by all the Mueller crap.”
U.S. Becomes Net Oil Exporter for First Time in Decades
America hits a crucial milestone of energy independence
BY EMEL AKAN
Refineries in Corpus Christi on Nov. 8, 2018. (Charlotte Cuthbertson/The Epoch Times)
The United States became a net oil exporter last week for the first time in almost 75 years, a significant step toward achieving “energy independence and dominance,” as promoted by President Donald Trump.
The United States had been a net oil importer since 1949. In the last week of November, however, weekly U.S. net imports of crude oil and petroleum products fell to minus 211,000 barrels per day (bpd), meaning the country became a net exporter of that amount, according to data from U.S. Energy Information and Administration.
The news came on the back of a surge in crude exports to a weekly record of more than 3.2 million bpd.
U.S. petroleum net imports peaked in 2005, reaching over 14 million bpd. It has declined gradually since then, falling to an average of 2 million bpd in recent months. This trend was the result of many factors, including increased domestic production of crude oil and hydrocarbon gas liquids.
U.S. oil production has more than doubled since 2012 because of the shale revolution, which started with the development of new technologies in oil extraction.
In the past half-century, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), led by Saudi Arabia, had largely dictated the oil markets. The rise of U.S. shale production, however, recently changed the dynamics.
The shale revolution has transformed the United States into the world’s largest petroleum producer, surpassing Russia and Saudi Arabia in recent months.
The International Energy Agency said in its latest World Energy Outlook that the United States will be the biggest contributor to the oil market, accounting for almost 75 percent of global oil production growth in the period to 2040.
The news about the United States becoming a net oil exporter was largely ignored last week, as markets were obsessed with the OPEC meeting in Vienna.
“While there is so much focus on the drama in the OPEC cartel, the real historic news that went unnoticed was that the United States last week exported more crude oil and fuel than it imported for the first time on record,” Phil Flynn, analyst at Price Futures Group in Chicago, wrote in an email.
“So now the United States can join the community of exporting nations as opposed to consuming nations, at least this week.”
OPEC Cuts Production
OPEC members and Russia agreed to cut oil production Dec. 7 after a two-day meeting in Vienna, rebuffing Trump’s call for higher output and lower oil prices. Saudi Arabia, Russia, and the rest of the OPEC nations announced to cut oil output by 1.2 million bpd for the first six months of 2019.
Following the announcement, U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude price increased more than 4 percent, reaching $53.70 and the international benchmark, Brent crude, was up nearly 5 percent at $63.
According to the agreement, the 15-member OPEC cartel will reduce output by a total of 800,000 bpd, while non-OPEC producers, led by Russia, committed to another 400,000 bpd cut.
Trump has repeatedly demanded that OPEC and Saudi Arabia push prices down. A day before the OPEC meeting, Trump sent another message to the cartel via Twitter.
“Hopefully OPEC will be keeping oil flows as is, not restricted. The World does not want to see, or need, higher oil prices!” he wrote on Dec. 5.
The agreement is only for six months, and the cartel will review the supply-demand balance again in April 2019, according to the reports.
Iran was a major holdout within OPEC during the talks, seeking an exemption from the cuts, which was initially turned down by Saudi Arabia. In the end, Tehran got a verbal assurance that it would be exempt, according to a Bloomberg report. Venezuela and Libya also got exemptions.
Oil prices have nosedived since peaking in early October amid fears of a potential supply glut and cooling global demand. Crude prices have slid nearly 30 percent from their highs.
To prevent a further slide in oil prices, Saudi Arabia’s Minister of Energy Khalid Al-Falih announced last month plans to cut production. Russian Energy Minister Alexander Novak, however, was more cautious about cuts, saying that “the market is in the stage of a good balance” because of temporary waivers for Iran oil.
Diverging perceptions of supply caused volatility in oil prices in recent weeks.
In November, Trump reinstated economic sanctions on Tehran but granted waivers to eight countries for oil imports from Iran to prevent a spike in oil prices. Oil prices sold off sharply following the news of exemptions. The market’s initial expectation was a more dramatic decline in global supply with fears of potentially zero Iranian exports.
The recent slump in oil prices is good for U.S. households. However, too low of a price may hurt U.S. shale oil producers in the long run. Low prices may lead to a slowdown in drilling activity and lower investments in the shale patch, according to experts.
The production cuts by OPEC and Russia will bring oil inventories back to their 5-year average level, Goldman Sachs analysts said in a report.
“We forecast Brent prices back slightly above $70 per barrel in early 2019—a price level consistent with normalized inventories, but not high enough to overstimulate shale drilling activity,” the report said.
Trump Gives Details of Cohen Payouts
by: TTN Staff
President Trump is strongly denying that the hush-money payments made by his former attorney to two women leading up to the campaign were campaign contributions.
As Fox New reports President Trump is calling it simply a private transaction:
President Trump went on to point out that if a mistake was made the liability for that mistake would rest with his former lawyer:
The President's position got support from veteran campaign finance lawyer Dan Backer who said in a recent interview with Forbes that he is less than impressed with the Justice Departments evidence.
As Fox News reports:
Dan Backer, the lawyer, told Forbes that there appears to be no evidence to corroborate the DOJ’s apparent assertion of any illegality on Trump's part.
Backer, a veteran campaign counsel, said it is common practice for high-profile individuals and companies to take part in these kinds of payment arrangements. He said Trump is a brand, he has carried out similar payments for years and these so-called "hush-buys" will likely continue.
"Brand protection is not a campaign contribution," he told the magazine.
---"The notion that every penny a candidate personally or professionally spends is somehow reportable to the FEC is utter nonsense," he continued.
Senator Rand Paul also came to the President's defense pointing out that the complex web of campaign finance laws presents a fairness issue that should be addressed.
Rep. Gohmert Blasted by Left for Calling Out Soros Ties to Nazis - ‘Mr. Soros as a mature adult verified that he had no sense of guilt about the role he played…’
As Fox New reports President Trump is calling it simply a private transaction:
President Trump went on to point out that if a mistake was made the liability for that mistake would rest with his former lawyer:
The President's position got support from veteran campaign finance lawyer Dan Backer who said in a recent interview with Forbes that he is less than impressed with the Justice Departments evidence.
As Fox News reports:
Dan Backer, the lawyer, told Forbes that there appears to be no evidence to corroborate the DOJ’s apparent assertion of any illegality on Trump's part.
Backer, a veteran campaign counsel, said it is common practice for high-profile individuals and companies to take part in these kinds of payment arrangements. He said Trump is a brand, he has carried out similar payments for years and these so-called "hush-buys" will likely continue.
"Brand protection is not a campaign contribution," he told the magazine.
---"The notion that every penny a candidate personally or professionally spends is somehow reportable to the FEC is utter nonsense," he continued.
Senator Rand Paul also came to the President's defense pointing out that the complex web of campaign finance laws presents a fairness issue that should be addressed.
Rep. Gohmert Blasted by Left for Calling Out Soros Ties to Nazis - ‘Mr. Soros as a mature adult verified that he had no sense of guilt about the role he played…’
(Michael Barnes, Liberty Headlines) Texas congressman Louie Gohmert is under fire for repeating a widely cited claim that leftist billionaire and global activist George Soros helped Nazis confiscate Jewish property during World War II — but Gohmert isn’t backing down.
Gohmert made the controversial comments during a Fox Business interview on Thursday.
Hours later, Open Society Foundation president Patrick Gaspard demanded an apology for what he described as “a disturbing and false anti-Semitic slur against George Soros.”
“You are not entitled to misrepresent his and his family’s courage during such a terrifying and difficult period in our history. This kind of vile discrimination and lying would be troubling to see at any time,” Gaspard wrote in a letter to the Texas Republican.
But the problem for Gaspard, is that Soros admitted it.
Soros, who is Jewish, founded the Open Society Foundation, making the Hungarian-born billionaire Gaspard’s boss. The organization funds and organizes left-wing activist groups around the world, and most prominently in the United States — which was the context of Gohmert’s remarks.
Gohmert referenced a 1998 60 Minutes interview with Soros that centered on his stock-market manipulations, one of which was making billions from crashing the British pound.
At one point, CBS interviewer Steve Kroft asked Soros about his rumored European wartime experiences:
KROFT: You watched lots of people get shipped off to the death camps.
SOROS: Right. I was 14 years old. And I would say that that’s when my character was made.
KROFT: In what way?
SOROS: That one should think ahead. One should understand and anticipate events when one is threatened. It was a tremendous threat of evil. I mean, it was a very personal experience of evil.
KROFT: That sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult?
SOROS: Not at all. Not at all. Maybe as a child you don’t see the connection. But it was, it created no, no problem at all.
KROFT: No feeling of guilt?
SOROS: No.
KROFT: For example that, “I’m Jewish and here I am, watching these people go. I could just as easily be there. I should be there.” None of that?
SOROS: Well, of course I could be on the other side or I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away. But there was no sense that I shouldn’t be there, because that was, well actually, in a funny way, it’s just like in markets. That if I weren’t there, I wasn’t doing it, but somebody else would be taking it away anyhow. And it was the — whether I was there or not — I was only a spectator, the property was being taken away. So I had no role in taking away that property. So I had no sense of guilt.
Not only has Gohmert refused to apologize for referring to Soros’ own words, he issued a rebuttal response to Gaspard’s letter Thursday evening.
“Mr. Gaspard, with the misnamed Open Society Foundation, has been very diligent to condemn opinions or allegations about Mr. Soros’ activity,” Gohmert, a former judge, wrote in a statement.
“Mr. Soros as a mature adult verified that he had no sense of guilt about the role he played in Nazis’ confiscation of property from the Jewish people during the Holocaust,” Gohmert said.
“As a very mature adult, if Mr. Soros had deep regrets about what he did when he was 14 years old and apologized, I would have nothing but sympathy and admiration. Were he ever to do that in the future, I would still have those same warm, respectful feelings,” he added.
Gohmert also pointed to Soros’s anti-Israel activism in his response.
In July 2017, the Israeli Foreign Ministry issued a statement saying George Soros “continuously undermines Israel’s democratically elected governments by funding organizations that defame the Jewish state and seek to deny it the right to defend itself.”
Gallup: More Than 750 Million People Globally Now Wanting to Migrate
Written by Virginia Hale
The Gallup World Poll survey, which interviewed 453,122 adults in 152 countries between 2015 and 2017, found that 15 percent of the world’s adult population would like to move to another country if they had the chance.
Noting this proportion had risen from 13 per cent between 2010 and 2012, and 14 per cent between 2013 and 2016, the pollster commented that rising populism and a backlash to mass immigration seen in many Western electorates has apparently not deterred would-be migrants from wanting to seek a better standard of living elsewhere.
Regionally, the desire to migrate was found to be highest in sub-Saharan Africa, where 33 percent of adults wanted to migrate permanently, followed by Latin America and the Caribbean (27 per cent), European nations outside of the EU (26 per cent), and the Middle East and North Africa (24 per cent).
Regionally, the desire to migrate was found to be highest in sub-Saharan Africa, where 33 percent of adults wanted to migrate permanently, followed by Latin America and the Caribbean (27 per cent), European nations outside of the EU (26 per cent), and the Middle East and North Africa (24 per cent).
Gallup found there were 13 countries in which half or more of the adult population said they wanted to migrate to another country, with Sierra Leone (71 per cent) topping the list for its proportion of would-be migrants, followed by Liberia (66 per cent) and Haiti (63 per cent).
The U.S. remains by far the most popular country for people wanting to move abroad, with 21 percent of potential migrants selecting it as their top destination, with Canada, Germany, France, Australia, and the UK each also ranking highly.
Politicians from around the world gathered in Marrakesh, Morocco, on Monday to sign their countries up to a UN accord declaring mass immigration to be “inevitable, desirable and necessary”; however a large number of nations including the U.S., Australia, Chile, Israel, and several EU countries withdrew from the agreement over concerns about national sovereignty.
Earlier this year, Breitbart London reported on data from the Pew Research Center which revealed that up to two-thirds of the 1.1 billion population — a number set to more than double by 2050 — of sub-Saharan Africa were wanting to migrate to Europe or the U.S., millions of whom were planning on making the journey within the next five years.
Analysts such as NumbersUSA president Roy Beck have long pointed out that mass migration into Western countries can never resolve the challenges faced by poor countries, especially as populations in the third world increase.
John-Henry Westen | LifeSiteNews. com
I’m just sending a quick email to you today to make sure you heard about what happened this past week. Facebook censored a post by blocking a picture of Santa Claus kneeling before the Baby Jesus, warning viewers that the photo "may show violent or graphic content.”
A second warning beneath the obscured image of Santa on bended knee, reverentially adoring the Christ Child states, “This photo was automatically covered so you can decide if you want to see it.” Users could click on a button to uncover the photo.
(This is what Facebook did to the photo):
Within minutes, we published a story on this despicable decision and shared it to our social media accounts (which are followed by hundreds of thousands of pro-life, pro-family leaders).
What happened next was amazing - the story went viral! In less than 18 hours, it was shared on Facebook over 42,000 times and received more than 60,000 pageviews. Then, it received a massive boost when it was picked up by Fox News columnist Todd Starnes, The Blaze, and other media outlets that same day.
Because our article put so much pressure on Facebook, they had no choice but to restore the image. A huge victory!
This is the sort of impact our family of readers and supporters can have on the culture. I want to invite you to join them and become a supporter of ours with a gift of $5, $35, or even $200 today. As a member of the LifeSite giving family, you can help us fight censorship from the increasingly anti-free speech goliaths like Facebook.
We’ve raised $22,009 towards our Christmas fundraiser so far thanks to our supporters - our most important fundraiser of the year! I hope you will consider a donation to join our family of supporters today.
For some time now, conservative organizations and public figures around the globe have faced serious viewpoint discrimination on social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google and others.
LifeSiteNews has not been immune to this. We need your help now to continue to fight FaceBook's blocking of conservative content.
Unfortunately, this kind of censorship will continue to happen, especially if we don’t report on it. Facebook, Twitter, Google and YouTube have all ramped up their efforts to drown out the pro-life, pro-family message. This is why we work each day to continue to expose their bias. Very few other news outlets are doing this, and we need help to keep up the fight!
So, Friend, I’d like to ask you to consider increasing your commitment to our reporting. Will you prayerfully consider becoming a supporter of ours?
We have fought the liberal bullies at Facebook numerous times this year (and won!), but these huge victories are only possible because of our generous supporters. If you join our giving family today, you can help ensure our reporting makes an even greater impact in 2019.
Putting life and family first,
John-Henry Westen
Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief
P.S. By joining the LifeSite giving family today, you can help us lead the way for more victories for conservatives in 2019!
G’ day…Ciao…
Helen and Moe Lauzier
Thus articles
that is all articles
This time, hopefully can provide benefits to you all. Okay, see you in another article post.
You are now reading the article the link address https://fairyforreference.blogspot.com/2018/12/grand-daughter-strikes-again.html
0 Response to " "
Post a Comment