FAIRY FOR CHILDREN

- Hallo friend FAIRY FOR CHILDREN, In the article you read this time with the title , we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article adventure, Article animation, Article fantasy, Article The latest, Article wit, we write can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title :
link :

Globalist Theresa May

WWW.MOEISSUESOFTHEDAY
.BLOGSPOT.COM Monday, November 26,2018
All Gave Some~Some Gave All
*****

Sinatra, a blue-eyed Husky from Brooklyn, turns up in Seffner after 18 months missing

Rose Verrill, 13, plays with Sinatra, a Husky she found wandering near her Seffner home. The dog somehow made his way 1,200 miles from the Brooklyn home where he disappeared 18 months ago. [BRONTE WITTPENN | Times]

BY KATELYN MASSARELLI
Times Correspondent

SEFFNER — The bookends are clear in the life of Sinatra, a 5-year-old, brown-and-white, blue-eyed Husky.

Beloved by his teenage owner and her parents, Sinatra disappeared after the girl died in a tragic gun accident.

Then earlier this month, he wandered into a neighborhood where people tracked down his family and arranged for them to be reunited this Sunday.

But Sinatra can’t explain what happened in between — an 18-month, 1,200 mile journey that took him from his home in Brooklyn to the streets of Seffner. Neither can his owners or the family who found him.

“I didn’t believe it at first, but when I saw the picture, I broke down in tears,” said Lesmore Willis of Brooklyn, whose 16-year-old daughter Zion Willis died in the accident at a friend’s house in November 2015. The dog had been Zion’s constant companion.

Rose Verrill, 13, found the dog wandering near her Lenna Avenue home in Seffner and her family launched a search with help from friend Jeanne Baldi. A local veterinarian removed an identification chip from Sinatra but couldn’t recover much information.

They turned to the Hillsborough County Pet Resource Center and came up with a possible owner’s name and a phone number. But the name, Willis Les, turned out to be convoluted and number was wrong — just one digit off.

With what information she had, Baldi took to social media. She decided to reach out to a Lesmore Willis whom she found there.

“I never would have thought he was from Brooklyn,” Baldi said. “I messaged Lesmore over Facebook and didn’t think it would lead to anything when I saw where he was from.”

But within a few days, Willis messaged back, saying he used to have a dog but it had been missing for a very long time.

Comparing notes, they both spoke of an animal that had a problem with its right foot

Then Baldi decided to send along the photo. Immediately, the mystery of where Sinatra ended up — if not how he got here — was solved.

Willis was overcome by emotion, Baldi said, thinking for months that this link with his daughter had been lost to him and his wife Maria.

“I told him that he was safe and well taken care of with Denise,” Baldi said.

In his temporary home, Sinatra — like his blue-eyed namesake — seems to enjoy breaking into song. He does a duet with another family dog.

“It’s the funniest thing,” said Rose’s mother, Denise Verrill. “He’s been such a wonderful guest and such a sweet dog. I can see why they love him so much.”

In Brooklyn, the grieving Willis family had suffered an added blow when Sinatra disappeared 18 months after Zion’s death.

“He’s known throughout the neighborhood as the dog who runs off to chase raccoons and squirrels,” Willis said. “He’s done it before, but usually he comes back no more than 30 minutes later, and he never came back.”

Zion Willis was an avid dancer and an animal lover at heart, her father said. Only after her death did he learn the teenager had started a dog-walking business on her own.

“Sinatra was her 14th birthday present,” Willis said. “That was her dog and their bond was strong. She loved to take him on her walks to the store. The love was obvious. When he was gone, it was like losing a part of her.”

Willis and his wife put up flyers and spent months actively searching for the dog, but had resolved that they’d never see him again.

He figures that other people might have found Sinatra and taken him in over the months but that he just kept running away. Verrill said that whatever happened, she’s pretty sure he didn’t walk the whole way.

On Sunday, a friend of Verrill’s will travel to Baltimore with Sinatra, and Willis will meet them there.

“Of course he’s getting a big hug as soon as I see him,” Willis said. “Sinatra always loved turkey legs at Thanksgiving, so I’m saving him a big turkey leg for when he returns home.”

Contact Katelyn Massarelli at hillsnews@tampabay.com.



Elizabeth Warren BUSTED with illegal cash

While Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Democrat, was preparing to fight the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh last month, she was also asking for illegal donations from her supporters — and critics say it was the same as soliciting bribes.

And she didn’t act alone.

California Sen. Kamala Harris, Democrat, joined Warren in the alleged “vote-buying” scheme, according to the nonpartisan ethics watchdog group Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT).

FACT submitted a formal complaint to the Senate Ethics Committee on Monday regarding Warren and Harris’ allegedly illegal actions.

Senate ethic rules strictly forbid elected officials from “cashing in” on their votes before they happen. But that didn’t stop Warren and Harris from reportedly soliciting thousands of voters for cash in exchange for their vote, FACT claimed.

Warren denied any knowledge of her campaign’s allegedly illegal fundraising efforts, and acted surprised when told there was an ethics investigation into her actions during a recent debate.

Her name was signed at the bottom of the email in question.

“Something that we found out recently that is pretty unconscionable is that Sen. Warren was fundraising illegally using the vote on Justice Kavanaugh — the confirmation vote — to try to raise money for her campaigns,” Republican senatorial candidate Geoff Diehl, who is running against Warren, said during a recent debate.

“That is something you should not be doing when we are having a national discussion about the Supreme Court … but you did, and turns out it’s illegal,” he said.

A formal criminal investigation into the fundraising tactics of both Warren and Harris could be ordered based on the complaint.

“Ms. Warren’s email said she was demanding a delay on the judge’s confirmation vote and asked for donations for her 2018 election campaign, while Ms. Harris’s emails detailed several of her actions as a member of the Judiciary Committee, including her questioning of the president’s pick for the high court, and asking for contributions,” The Washington Times reported.

Asking for money upfront as a measure of support for a senators vote?

That’s a big no-no, says the watchdog group.

Warren attempted “to gain considerable campaign income as well as important donor information by promising to use their official position as a Senator,” said Kendra Arnold, executive director of FACT.

“This is a clear violation of the Senate Ethics rules which safeguard against the appearance or actuality of elected officials ‘cashing in’ on their official position for political purposes,” Arnold said.



Trump Has the Saudis Where He Wants Them

Mandel Ngan / Getty

President Donald Trump has endured blistering criticism from the media and from his political opponents in both parties over his statement earlier this week expressing support for Saudi Arabia, even in the wake of the murder of Jamal Khashoggi. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI), a veteran and war critic, even called Trump “Saudi Arabia’s bitch.”

In fact, the situation is exactly the reverse, and Gabbard should be praising Trump for advancing the cause of peace.

Trump now has the Saudis exactly where he wants them. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), once the toast of the world’s elites, is now widely portrayed as an accused murderer. President Trump could join the attack, perhaps even pushing MBS out of power and destabilizing the Saudi regime itself. Instead, Trump has positioned himself as MBS’s last and best friend. Without Trump’s support, MBS might not survive long — and he knows it.

That puts Trump in a position to make demands. He has already engineered peace talks in Yemen between the Saudi-backed government and the Iranian-backed rebels. He claims to have convinced the Saudis to increase oil production to keep prices low. And he may be able to achieve bigger things yet — such as Saudi support for an Israeli-Palestinian peace plan that would conclude the conflict on terms favorable to the United States and Israel.

Trump could, for example, instruct the Saudis to accept, and to pressure the Palestinians to accept, a peace plan that recognizes both Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state and Israel’s sovereignty in Jerusalem. He could tell MBS that the burden of bankrolling the Palestinians — including the so-called “refugees” — is now his. And he could sweeten the deal by giving the Saudis some authority over Muslim holy sites in Jerusalem. MBS would be foolish to refuse.

Alternatively, Trump could bow to the “Obama bros” and the cable news pundits, and attack MBS for the death of Khashoggi, downgrading relations and insisting on regime change.

But it is not clear what broader good that would achieve. The Middle East is not going to become a more humane place just because another tyrant falls. And Iran would take advantage of Saudi Arabia’s weakness to bolster its terrorist proxies and its nuclear ambitions.

President Barack Obama’s approach shows exactly what not to do. When U.S.-allied Arab regimes began cracking down on protests during the Arab Spring, Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton first defended the regimes, in line with the neorealist dogma in vogue among the anti-war left and reflected in the recommendations of the Iraq Study Group, whose principle scribe was Obama lackey Ben Rhodes. But they lacked the will to follow through.

Obama and Clinton then swung behind the rebels and the Muslim Brotherhood, hoping to guide the revolutionary fervor in the direction of liberal democracy. Their hope was that new Islamist governments might look like Recep Tayyip Ergodan’s government in Turkey, then seen as a model of how to balance political Islam with modernity. When Obama and Clinton attacked Libya in 2011, they had come full circle: they were the neo-neo-conservatives.

When that failed, Obama abandoned the idea of appeasing the Sunni world, and backed the idea of Iran as a new regional hegemon, hoping that by re-integrating the regime into global markets, he would encourage it to become more moderate.

The opposite happened, because — just as he did in “normalizing” relations with Cuba — Obama gave away American leverage over the Iranian regime up front, removing sanctions and delivering pallets of cash.

The only positive consequence of Obama’s blundering was an unintended one: by strengthening Iran, he caused the Saudis and other sunni Arab regimes to reach out to Israel in a tacit alliance against their common enemy.

Trump has seized the opportunity that re-alignment provides. At the same time, he has undermined Saudi Arabia’s only real source of leverage over the U.S. — oil — by encouraging domestic oil production, which Obama tried to discourage.

The murder of Jamal Khashoggi was a terrible crime — one the U.S. has condemned, backing words with sanctions against many Saudi officials believed to have been involved. Yet it does not follow that our national interests should suffer as a result.

Though it may be hard to see through his plain-spoken, even jarring prose, Trump has chosen to be a statesman rather than a scold, exploiting the Saudi predicament to promote the chances of peace and prosperity.

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News.

How Leftist Protesters Are Bribed to Show Up and Make a Fuss

'Compensation for demonstrations is more insidious than you may think,' explains this op-ed author

By Steve Pomper

Wealthy leftist donors pay activists to attend political protests. That we know.

This was particularly revealed during the Brett Kavanaugh Senate hearings when a George Soros-paid activist ambushed squishy Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) in an elevator.

Well, this sort of compensation for demonstrations is more insidious than you may think.

Recently, I wrote about a city council candidate, Chris Rufo, who, along with his family, was intimidated into suspending his campaign due to intolerant leftist threats.

Rufo’s campaign policy paper reminded me of a far-Left, supposedly homeless-helping organization called SHARE/WHEEL. During my police career, I had to deal with these SHARE folks who operated within my precinct. What I recall most about them was their consistent unwillingness to cooperate with the police, often “protecting” criminals from us.

In Rufo’s campaign platform position paper, he explains another, even more sinister, way that leftist community organizations get people out in the streets to participate in their never-ending demonstrations.

Why compensate people with cash when you can bribe them with a bed?

Regarding one of Seattle’s 400 “homeless” encampments, this one comprised of “tiny houses” run by SHARE, Rufo writes: “Even worse, the organization that runs the Licton Springs encampment, SHARE, effectively uses taxpayer money to lobby the city for more taxpayer money. They operate their encampments on a system of ‘participation credits,’ requiring residents to attend political rallies, campaign events, and city council hearings. At last year’s city income tax hearing at the King County Superior Court, I spoke with a homeless woman who lived in a SHARE encampment who explained that if she did not show up to the court proceeding, she would be kicked out of the camp for one week.”

What is this? Compassionate extortion?

Rufo refers to what has become the “Homeless-Industrial Complex” (HIC), of which I wrote about earlier this year. Eleanor Owen, a co-founder of the Downtown Emergency Services Center (DESC), an organization established in 1979 to help the homeless, told Rufo that over the years the organization’s operation has changed.

She explained that DESC’s focus has gone from “helping the homeless to securing government contracts, maintaining a $112 million real estate portfolio, and paying a staff of 900 people.”

Further, about DESC’s mission, Owen said, “When we started, we kept our costs low and helped people get back on their feet. [Now] It’s more important to keep staff paid than to actually help the poor become self-sufficient.” This explains how a billion dollars a year can be spent on the Seattle area’s homeless problem, and it only gets worse.

The HIC needs “homelessness” to continue or, even better, get worse to justify its existence. End homelessness and 900 (and that’s just one organization) people lose their jobs. These folks are not interested in ending the problem. They’re dedicated to seeing that the problem continues. In this endeavor, they have been wildly successful.

This is a leftist-run government phenomenon. Tyler Durden of zerohedge.com writes, “Social crises justify huge spending and expansions of the government. The homeless crisis is largely a problem in lefty cities where it’s heavily subsidized.”

Durden asks, “Why does Texas have only 17 percent of the homeless population of California? Why does Colorado have four times the homeless population of Utah? Why do Oregon and Washington have more homeless than Montana, Idaho, South and North Dakota, Wyoming, Utah, Nebraska, Kansas, and Iowa combined?”

This is a leftist-run government phenomenon. Tyler Durden of zerohedge.com writes, “Social crises justify huge spending and expansions of the government. The homeless crisis is largely a problem in lefty cities where it’s heavily subsidized.”

You might argue, at least with Washington and Oregon, it’s because the states have more moderate climates (well, in the western parts of those states: Seattle and Portland). That may be true, but you couldn’t say that about the other state comparisons.

And what about New York City? It’s run by a socialist mayor, and it does not have anywhere near a moderate climate. Durden reports NYC will spend $2.06 billion on its homeless problem.

So, if you ever wonder how those leftist groups get people in the streets so quickly and so often, now you know. The formula is easy: Issue “homeless” folks some fake outrage, pre-produced signs, and slap a little cash in their hands.

Steve Pomper is an OpsLens contributor and retired Seattle police officer. He has served as a field training officer on the East Precinct Community Police Team, and as a precinct mountain bike coordinator. He has a BA in English language and literature.



The Debate Over Nationalism Is A Debate Over The West’s Future

Liberals fail to understand and anticipate the desire of normal people to feel passionately about the flag their forefathers fought for.

By Sumantra Maitra

A pivotal debate is happening over the meaning and merit of “nationalism.” It will decide the heart and soul, as well the character and future of the West.

The French finance minister, Bruno Le Maire, recently argued that Europe needs to turn to an empire to face off China and the United States. That came after both French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel argued for a common European army. The presidents of Hungary and Poland, on the other hand, have started to lead a bloc that extols the virtue of nationalism and federalism. Of course, President Trump also famously (or notoriously, depending on which paper you’re reading) said that one should be proud to be a nationalist.

Two tweets that showed up one after the other on my Twitter timeline struck me as relevant to the conversation. The first was from Tom Nichols, which somewhat bafflingly and ahistorically stated: “Patriotism is the love of an idea. Nationalism is the love of a chromosome.”

It’s baffling in the sense that it would imply that love for your home, or neighborhood, is the love of a theory. Wonder what John Adams, Mahatma Gandhi, or Vaclav Havel would have to say to that? The second was regarding a podcast of Yoram Hazony, in which he lambasts the European Union as a new liberal empire that wants to kill off every single independent nation-state in the European continent and then turn its sights on other great powers, possibly including the United States.

Why is nationalism being portrayed by a certain section of liberal and libertarian intellectuals as a horrific throwback to a dangerous past? It relates to an understanding 100 years after World War I of the horrific slaughter that ended an old order and propelled us into a new.

Sitting in the present era, it’s hard to imagine how rapidly the world order can change, as we have seen in 1945 and in 1991. But nothing was as pivotal as 1918. The entire old Christian Europe-dominated world collapsed, and we were hurled to the modern, secular, post-religious age, with the collapse of Imperial Russia, the Ottomans, Imperial Germany, and the Austro-Hungarian empire.

Even Great Britain, the superpower of those days since the fall of Napoleon, went into relative decline, as the global balance of power moved from Europe, and started to shift to the Americans and the Soviets. The collapse of the Westphalian nation-states and empires, and the palpable shock that was a result of the mindless slaughter of young men from every social class, from poets to prisoners, scientists to sportsmen, in the Belgian meadows changed the structure of European continent from which the continent arguably never recovered.

The nation-states and empires lost their glories, treasure, and men, and turned to victimhood. This led to the rise of murderous modern internationalist and imperial ideologies like Nazism and Leninism. We all know what that led to.

Since the end of the first world war, and especially after the second world war, there has been a consistent attempt to move past nation-states as the primary unit of global politics, because liberals believe that nations and powers are the primary cause of conflict in the world. The reality, however, is of course much more complex.

Balance of power maintained the century-long peace since the fall of Napoleon, one that broke only after Imperial Germany started wars of aggression. But it is the false myths of the first world war that have led to a periodic push to obliterate borders and nation-states in the cause of global governance and perpetual peace. Liberalism, as Robert Kagan wrote, was an “act of defiance against both history and human nature.”

This is, after all, the crux of the debate, and the prime paradox of liberal internationalism. As John Mearsheimer wrote, “A purely liberal state is soulless: it creates few emotional bonds between citizens and their government, which is why it is sometimes said that getting people to fight and die for a liberal state is especially difficult.”

One can see this in Europe, where the percentage of people who are willing to fight and die for their country varies extremely between the conservative East and the liberal West. Mearsheimer argues that in the clash of national sentiments and liberalism, nationalism will always win, which will, in turn, lead to hardcore liberals behaving like imperialists.

Because liberalism is radically individualist on the domestic front, humans as social animals find that destructive. That either leads to either ethnic or racial tribalism, or supranational empires, like the EU or the Soviet Union. So, in a curious twist of fate, it leads to the same old clash between liberal, or Marxist, imperialism and nation-states that wants to break free of a borderless ideology.

Think about this for a moment. If someone is living and working in America, where would you want his loyalties to lie; to the land that provides him food, work, opportunity, and a good life, or to some vague borderless internationalist idea, like liberal internationalism, Marxism, or Islamism? Would you prefer your fellow countrymen to pledge loyalty to Communist International, the Islamic caliphate, the United Nations, or the European Union?

Liberalism has succeeded in changing Western elite opinions about borders. Borders, nation-states, and nationalism are anathema for a group of people, a transnational class of bureaucrats, who are more interested in having their gardens done by cheap labor pouring in from outside while they sip their lattes and hyperventilate about hairbrained schemes of spreading democracy in Libya as their own countrymen suffer from opioid epidemic and joblessness.

This is the same group of people Samuel Huntington derided as “Davos Men” — global elites with “little need for national loyalty, view national boundaries as obstacles that thankfully are vanishing, and see national governments as residues from the past whose only useful function is to facilitate the elite’s global operations.” These are the same elites who will never serve if the bugle sounds for the wars and interventions they plan to reshape hells on earth in utopian dreams of turning them to liberal paradise, where their less fortunate but patriotic fellow citizens die to try to implement that dream.

Liberals fail to understand and anticipate the desire of normal people to feel passionately about the flag their forefathers fought for. That leads to a vacuum, which is filled by ethnocentric tribalism. If conservatives don’t reclaim healthy civic nationalism, the choice ahead is almost always either ideological internationalism and rules through institutions and bureaucrats, or atomized ethnic nationalism, tribalism, and racism. The elite abhorrence of anything that relates to flags and land and borders shows how much the window has moved in the last couple of decades.

The only unifying force is a healthy, civic, conservative nationalism, the type that stops distinguishing between tribes, races, and ethnicities and unites in a love for the land beneath one’s feet. In a world where the choice is increasingly between Antifa and Abolish ICE mobs on the one hand, and transnational open border Davos Men on the other, conservative nationalism might be the only centrist option.

Sumantra Maitra is a doctoral researcher at the University of Nottingham, UK. His research is in great power-politics and neorealism. He also regularly writes for The National Interest and Quillette Magazine, and edits Bombs and Dollars blog. You can find him on Twitter @MrMaitra

Adam and Eve? One Couple Spawned Humanity, Study Claims

A woman looks at a painting entitled 'Adam and Eve' by German artist Lucas Cranach the Elder,(FRANCOIS GUILLOT/AFP/Getty Images)

By Eric Mack   

Despite a scientist fighting "hard" against the claim, humanity spawned from a single pair which lived 100,000 to 200,000 years ago, according to a new study, the U.K.'s Daily Mail reported.

"This conclusion is very surprising,'" University of Basel, Switzerland, research associate David Thaler told the paper. "And I fought against it as hard as I could."

Senior Research Associate Mark Stoeckle and Thaler surveyed the DNA of five million animals, including humans, "and deduced that we sprang from a single pair of adults after a catastrophic event almost wiped out the human race," per the report.

Stoeckle and Thaler concluded that 90 percent of all of today's animal species come from parents that all began giving birth at roughly the same time, less than 250 thousand years ago, leaving some doubt on human evolution.

"At a time when humans place so much emphasis on individual and group differences, maybe we should spend more time on the ways in which we resemble one another and the rest of the animal kingdom," Stoeckle told the Daily Mail.

". . . One might have thought that, due to their high population numbers and wide geographic distribution, humans might have led to greater genetic diversity than other animal species," Stoeckle added. "At least for mitochondrial DNA, humans turn out to be low to average in genetic diversity."

G’ day…Ciao…
Helen and Moe Lauzier

Thus articles

that is all articles This time, hopefully can provide benefits to you all. Okay, see you in another article post.

You are now reading the article the link address https://fairyforreference.blogspot.com/2018/11/globalist-theresa-may-www.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: