Title :
link :
WWW.MOEISSUESOFTHEDAY
.BLOGSPOT.COM Tuesday, October 30,2018
All Gave Some~Some Gave All
*****
JUDGE BRINGS END TO CALIFORNIA LAW REQUIRING PRO-LIFE GROUPS TO PROMOTE ABORTION
Kevin Daley | Supreme Court Reporter
A federal judge in San Diego has permanently barred enforcement of California’s Reproductive FACT Act, which requires pro-life crisis pregnancy centers to disseminate information about abortion.
The Friday order follows a June 26 Supreme Court decision that found that the FACT Act likely violates the First Amendment.
“The government has no business forcing anyone to express a message that violates their convictions, especially on deeply divisive subjects such as abortion,” said the Alliance Defending Freedom’s Michael Farris, who represented a coalition of pro-life groups challenging the law. “California disregarded that truth when it passed its law forcing pro-life centers to advertise for the abortion industry. The district court’s order puts a permanent end to that law in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in June, which rightly found that ‘the people lose when the government is the one deciding which ideas should prevail.'”
“The outcome of this case affirms the freedom that all Americans have to speak — or not to speak — in accordance with their conscience,” Farris added.
There are some 200 pro-life pregnancy clinics in California, many of which have a religious orientation. The FACT Act required clinics licensed by the state to post a bulletin relaying information about abortion access in a “conspicuous place” within the facility. Unlicensed clinics — which provide various support services but do not offer advanced medical care — must disclose that they are not credentialed to practice medicine on site and in all advertisements.
The National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) challenged the law on constitutional grounds, arguing it violated the First Amendment because it forces a private speaker to spread a message with which they disagree.
California countered that it has a legitimate interest in ensuring its citizens are well-informed about the range of reproductive health options available to them. The state also feared many pro-life clinics conceal their anti-abortion mission from unwitting patients.
Pro-life and pro-choice protesters rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court waiting for the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra case which remains pending, in Washington, U.S., June 25, 2018. REUTERS/Toya Sarno Jordan
On appeal to the Supreme Court, a five justice majority led by Justice Clarence Thomas found the law likely violates the First Amendment. The case then returned to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, which entered final judgment against the FACT Act. The plaintiffs may also ask to recoup the cost of the litigation.
In one of his last opinions on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote a concurrence “to underscore that the apparent viewpoint discrimination here is a matter of serious constitutional concern.”
“Governments must not be allowed to force persons to express a message contrary to their deepest convictions,” Kennedy wrote. “Freedom of speech secures freedom of thought and belief. This law imperils those liberties.”
THE LIBERTY DAILY
The Conservative Alternative to the Drudge Report
![George Soros Express: Leaked Documents Prove Anti-American Globalist George Soros’s ‘Open [Borders] Society’ Is Working with UN in Supporting Mob of Foreign Invaders](https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/qD2_4Vdn-QAUE73CneUm_2Y7YL-ouPfAsCYTEhBACz268wWqZtlbSUnqE1Ur4Kj4XJ8SfXi78oTnbci9P82sB4uQAh1V6YgJqzoUqKM6T3bV3PS6jR-Nkum8NVUbfEbROaJYiBNX)
George Soros Express: Leaked Documents Prove Anti-American Globalist George Soros’s ‘Open [Borders] Society’ Is Working with UN in Supporting Mob of Foreign Invaders
https://www.forbes.com/sites/melikkaylan/2018/03/01/why-populists-hate-george-soros-and-how-it-started/#76f7f7ce13d0
President Trump Sends 5,000 Troops to Border to Stop Foreign Invasion Mob: ‘This is an Invasion of Our Country and Our Military is Waiting for You!’
https://defensemaven.io/bluelivesmatter/news/just-in-5-000-troops-being-deployed-to-u-s-mexico-border-U8HCCw3YfkO818Cff17BAg/
$280 Million USAID Program Was To Help 75,000 Afghan Women - It Helped 60
Since 2015, The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has spent $280 million on a program intended to help tens of thousands of Afghan women enter their country’s workforce and gain promotions. According to a report from the Special Inspector General for Afghan Reconstruction (SIGAR), the program has helped somewhere between no women and roughly 60.
PAMELA GELLER
This should come as no surprise to anyone. The money was intended to help Afghan Muslim women join the workforce. But in Afghanistan, and in Islamic law, women are essentially only slaves of men. They have no business joining the workforce and working outside the home. They should just be cooking and cleaning and having babies. This comes from the Islamic reduction of women to the status of commodities, and that’s why this program failed, but of course, no one in USAID will ever examine or admit that. They are claiming the problem was that the program was poorly organized. Yeah, that’s it.
“A $280 Million U.S. Aid Program Was Supposed To Help 75,000 Afghan Women. It Helped 60.,” by Zuri Davis, Reason, September 13, 2018 (thanks to Christian):
Since 2015, The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has spent $280 million on a program intended to help tens of thousands of Afghan women enter their country’s workforce and gain promotions. According to a report from the Special Inspector General for Afghan Reconstruction (SIGAR), the program has helped somewhere between no women and roughly 60.
USAID’s “Promote” program is the agency’s “largest women’s empowerment program in [USAID] history,” according to the program’s website. It was supposed to train Afghan women to enter the private and public sectors, and then help them become eligible for promotions in their fields. And it was intended to extend those training and hiring benefits to 75,000 Afghan women.
But SIGAR found that in the three years since Promote’s 2015 founding, the number of women who found “new or better” employment was closer to 55. SIGAR added that it could not conclusively credit the women’s successes to the program. SIGAR also reported that it is “unclear” whether or not the Afghan government will choose to support the program “as the Afghan government might not be able to hire all of Promote’s graduates.” It is also “unclear whether the graduates will obtain jobs in the private sector in large numbers due to the country’s low projected economic growth rate.”…
Trump interviews woman of color to replace Brett Kavanaugh on DC Circuit Court
by Jerry McCormick
Now that Brett Kavanaugh has been confirmed to the Supreme Court, it is time to name his replacement on the D.C. Circuit Court.
When word got out that President Donald Trump interviewed Neomi Rao, who is of Indian descent, for the job, the media was absolutely stunned.
The Nominee
The appointment of Kavanaugh’s replacement on the circuit court is a huge story in the mainstream media right now.
No matter who Trump nominates, that individual is going to face considerable scrutiny.
President Trump knows this and is going to go to great lengths to ensure the nominee cannot be scrutinized at all.
Rao was recommended to the president by his former counsel Don McGahn.
Rao had previously served as a clerk for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
In 2017, she was confirmed 54-41 by the Senate to run the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.
She is currently working in the Office of Management and Budget.
Important Appointment
With midterm elections just over a week away, this appointment is fairly significant.
Due to recent events, Trump is once again taking heat from the mainstream media over his alleged “racism.”
But what would the media do if Trump were to nominate a woman of color to the role?
Would they say he was trying to make the courts more diverse — or try to portray her as someone to merely make him appear proper in the eyes of the public?
In doing so, would they not be insulting the qualifications of Rao or any other candidate Trump puts forward?
Then, the question is if anyone would dare call them on it, including the candidate him or herself.
One thing we do know is that Trump will eventually put the person up for the position that truly deserves it — and that nominee will be completely supported by conservatives.
G’ day…Ciao… Helen and Moe Lauzier
Thus articles
that is all articles
This time, hopefully can provide benefits to you all. Okay, see you in another article post.
You are now reading the article the link address https://fairyforreference.blogspot.com/2018/10/www_29.html
0 Response to " "
Post a Comment