Title :
link :
WWW.MOEISSUESOFTHEDAY.
BLOGSPOT.COM
Sunday, May 20, 2018
All Gave Some~Some Gave All
*****
Special Meaning Behind Meghan Markle’s Diamond Tiara Lent to Her by the Queen
All around this country — and others — fans and aficionados of all things royal woke up this morning with Christmas-morning anticipation, ready to watch the wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.
The much-anticipated event has been broadcast live nearly everywhere, to ensure that everyone can get a taste of the ceremony and participate in some form from afar.
Markle made a stunning bride in her understated dress by Clare Waight Keller for Givenchy. The two worked together to make sure the dress was just what Markle wanted.
The Cathedral-length veil, suitable for a royal wedding, has an inside story as well. Markle wanted to be as inclusive as possible, and Keller worked with her on that as well, as told on the Kensington Palace Twitter account.
“Ms. Markle expressed the wish of having all 53 countries of the Commonwealth with her on her journey through the ceremony,” the tweet read.
“Ms. Waight Keller designed a veil representing the distinctive flora of each Commonwealth country united in one spectacular floral composition.”
Dresses and veils are fairly common at weddings, but one element that set Markle apart (besides the quality of her dress and veil) was the tiara.
Royal brides are expected to wear tiaras, and there is — of course — meaning behind their choices. The choice of tiara is almost as important as the dress.
Catherine Middleton wore the Cartier Halo Tiara bought by King George VI in 1936 for his wife as a gift. She paired it with simple but elegant earrings.
Some thought that Meghan might opt for the same tiara, but it’s currently part of a display and unavailable for use.
There were a handful of other tiaras that fans suspected might make the final cut, but the one Markle ended up choosing went brilliantly with the elegant simplicity of her couture dress.
Markle ended up opting for a bandeau tiara that dates back to 1836. It was a lovely gesture as she married into the family.
The Kensington Palace also offered more details on the piece.
“The veil is held in place by Queen Mary’s diamond bandeau tiara, lent to Ms. Markle by The Queen. The diamond bandeau is English and was made in 1932, with the entre brooch dating from 1893.”
The brooch at the center has been set with a sapphire in the past, but Markle chose to go with the traditional wedding colors and stick to diamond.
Paired with a set of modest earrings, the only sparkle that was brighter than the stones in that tiara was the looks in the bride and groom’s eyes as they saw each other. All the best to the happy couple!
Report asks who is watching Barron Trump while his mother is in the hospital
Image via lev radin / Shutterstock.comA blogger for a local Chicago publication is taking the First Lady’s hospital stay as a way to take another cheap shot at the Trump’s.
Howard Moore, who writes a blog for Chicago Now, recently penned a post titled, “Who has been watching Barron Trump this week?”
What That Supposed to be Funny?
One only need to read the bio written by the author to realize his agenda.
While admitting the time for his blog had come to an end, he says it was revitalized with the presidency of Donald Trump.
Somehow, taking a shot at Trump and using Barron for the bulk of his schtick seemed to be funny for this no-talent hack.
Going After the Family
Not only did Mr. Moore go after the President, FLOTUS, and young Barron, but he also took the opportunity to go after the rest of the Trump family.
First, he uses the rest of the Trump children as reason for the President himself being able to take care of Barron.
Moore then rips into Donald Jr., Eric, and Ivanka as being unsuitable parents.
Even more despicable is his recommendation Trump would perhaps call up Stormy Davis, the porn star, for some help taking care of Barron over the next few days.
The entire column is nothing more than liberal garbage trying to be pushed off as some type of journalism.
Liberal Cheap Shots at Barron
This is not the first time we have seen a liberal use Barron for shock headlines.
As you may recall, Rosie O’Donnell, not exactly a mother of the year candidate, wrote some pretty disturbing accusations about Barron.
Then, she tried to play it off as though she was actually concerned about the boy’s well-being.
You are a lowlife hack, Mr. Moore, so don’t worry about Barron.
The country can rest easy knowing full-well he is being taken care of properly, no thanks to your idiotic insinuations.
To Spite Trump, Nancy Pelosi Defends MS-13 Gang Members on National TV
BY BEN MARQUIS
Trump Derangement Syndrome has apparently become so severe among certain liberals that elected Democrats like House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi are actually defending criminal members of the MS-13 gang against the president.
President Donald Trump hosted California law enforcement officials and political leaders at the White House on Wednesday to discuss the state’s “sanctuary” laws that make it difficult to cooperate with federal immigration officials.
One of the sheriffs in attendance lamented how California’s laws prevented her department from handing over known gang members who’ve committed crimes, specifically those of the notoriously brutal Central American gang, MS-13, if they didn’t reach a certain “threshold” set by the state.
In response to the sheriff’s remark about MS-13, Trump said, “These aren’t people, these are animals, and we’re taking them out of the country at a level and a rate that’s never happened before.”
GOP✔@GOPSee it for yourself. Take one minute to watch the full context of @realDonaldTrump’s comment on MS-13 members.
On cue, the anti-Trump liberal media and a number of elected Democrats — including Pelosi — took that “animals” remark out of context and deliberately misconstrued it as applying to all illegal immigrants, not just the brutal criminal gang members Trump and the sheriff were specifically talking about.
While a number of media outlets walked back their absurd smear against the president within hours — largely due to the intense backlash they received from anyone with a bit of sense and intellectual honesty — Pelosi persisted with the out-of-context interpretation of Trump’s “animals” remark during a media briefing on Thursday.
“When the president of the United States says about undocumented immigrants, ‘these aren’t people, these are animals’ — you have to wonder, does he not believe in the spark of divinity, the dignity and worth of every person,” Pelosi said with a confused look on her face.
“These are not people, these are animals,” she repeated. “The president of the United States.”
“Every day that you think you’ve seen it all, along comes another manifestation of why (the Trump administration’s) policies are so inhumane,” she added.
While it certainly appears that one of the leaders of the Democrat Party just defended MS-13 gang members, one has to wonder if Pelosi even checked to see the context of what Trump had actually said, or if she just blindly lashed out at at Trump because, well, he’s Trump.
Bear in mind that even by criminal gang member standards, MS-13 is the worst of the worst, evil individuals whose motto is “rape, control, kill,” who enjoy sadistically brutalizing and torturing innocent people to death and prefer to use knives and machetes instead of firearms to do their worst.
“Spark of divinity” or not, these subhuman “animals” of MS-13 pretty much forfeit the “dignity and worth” generally attributed to humanity when they gleefully carve up their victims, rape and murder women for fun and call for the targeted assassination of police.
As White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Thursday in response to the insane media smears against Trump’s remark, “animals” doesn’t go far enough to describe how truly evil and horrible these criminals really are.
If she had any shame, Pelosi would issue a retraction to her comments, but she is so consumed by spiteful hate for Trump that she will likely stand by her defense of MS-13 gang members as being deserving of the same “dignity and worth” ascribed to non-sadistically murderous people.
YUGE: Mueller Reaches Indictment Decision On President Trump
Special Counsel Robert Mueller has reportedly informed President Donald Trump’s legal team that they cannot indict the president.
According to Fox News, Rudy Giuliani, who serves on Trump’s legal team, said Mueller’s office informed the White House that they will not bring any charges against Trump.
“All they get to do is write a report,” Giuliani said. “They can’t indict. At least they acknowledged that to us after some battling, they acknowledged that to us.”
“The precedent that federal prosecutors cannot indict a sitting president is laid out in a 1999 Justice Department memo,” he added.
Giuliani said Mueller has no choice but to follow the memo’s instruction, signaling Mueller’s probe might be over very soon.
“This case is essentially over,” Giuliani said. “They’re just in denial.”
Here’s Fox News anchor Bret Baier and White House Correspondent John Roberts discussing the report:
Mueller told Trump's legal team he will not indict the president, Giuliani tells Fox News. @johnrobertsFox has the story. #SpecialReporthttps://t.co/S1Vpw5QcpO pic.twitter.com/Ys109SH3wO
According to Fox News, Rudy Giuliani, who serves on Trump’s legal team, said Mueller’s office informed the White House that they will not bring any charges against Trump.
“All they get to do is write a report,” Giuliani said. “They can’t indict. At least they acknowledged that to us after some battling, they acknowledged that to us.”
“The precedent that federal prosecutors cannot indict a sitting president is laid out in a 1999 Justice Department memo,” he added.
Giuliani said Mueller has no choice but to follow the memo’s instruction, signaling Mueller’s probe might be over very soon.
“This case is essentially over,” Giuliani said. “They’re just in denial.”
Here’s Fox News anchor Bret Baier and White House Correspondent John Roberts discussing the report:
Mueller told Trump's legal team he will not indict the president, Giuliani tells Fox News. @johnrobertsFox has the story. #SpecialReporthttps://t.co/S1Vpw5QcpO pic.twitter.com/Ys109SH3wO
— Fox News (@FoxNews) May 16, 2018
Here’s how social media reacted:
Rudy Giuliani tells @FoxNews that Robert Mueller told @realDonaldTrump legal team two weeks ago that he will abide by DOJ guidelines that a President cannot be indicted. Giuliani said Mueller has no choice but to honor a 1999 Clinton-era memo
— John Roberts (@johnrobertsFox) May 16, 2018
BREAKING: Giuliani says Mueller's team is aware that they can't indict President Trump #MTPDaily pic.twitter.com/mPWkb4eo5N
— Meet the Press (@MeetThePress) May 16, 2018
BREAKING: Special counsel Robert Mueller's team has informed President Donald Trump's attorneys that they have concluded that they cannot indict a sitting president, according to Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani https://t.co/Mmu3SX8N2t pic.twitter.com/kcxEVFaJtr
— CNN (@CNN) May 16, 2018
Rudy Giuliani on the Mueller probe:
"The case is essentially over. They're just in denial." pic.twitter.com/5n4zTVnPZQ
— Paul Hookem (@PaulHook_em) May 16, 2018
BREAKING: Rudy Giuliani says Robert Mueller's team has concluded it can't indict a sitting president https://t.co/xdpW5rpihcpic.twitter.com/jo0GdLxC6s
— The Washington Times (@WashTimes) May 16, 2018
After a year of investigating, Mueller hasn’t found or produced a shred of evidence against Trump or about any alleged Russian collusion.
Trump has been cooperating with the special counsel’s office for more than a year, and it appears they are finally admitting that there’s no wrongdoing or any power to indict Trump on any charges.
The media has spent the last two years pushing endless conspiracy theories about Trump, and they have been proven wrong.
The witch hunt appears to be nearing an end, and the media and “experts” owe Trump an apology for slandering him since he won the election.
Follow Martin on Facebook.
The Inspector General's Report Will Expose the MSM as Treasonous
BY ROGER L SIMON
Here’s how social media reacted:
Rudy Giuliani tells @FoxNews that Robert Mueller told @realDonaldTrump legal team two weeks ago that he will abide by DOJ guidelines that a President cannot be indicted. Giuliani said Mueller has no choice but to honor a 1999 Clinton-era memo
— John Roberts (@johnrobertsFox) May 16, 2018
BREAKING: Giuliani says Mueller's team is aware that they can't indict President Trump #MTPDaily pic.twitter.com/mPWkb4eo5N
— Meet the Press (@MeetThePress) May 16, 2018
BREAKING: Special counsel Robert Mueller's team has informed President Donald Trump's attorneys that they have concluded that they cannot indict a sitting president, according to Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani https://t.co/Mmu3SX8N2t pic.twitter.com/kcxEVFaJtr
— CNN (@CNN) May 16, 2018
Rudy Giuliani on the Mueller probe:
"The case is essentially over. They're just in denial." pic.twitter.com/5n4zTVnPZQ
— Paul Hookem (@PaulHook_em) May 16, 2018
BREAKING: Rudy Giuliani says Robert Mueller's team has concluded it can't indict a sitting president https://t.co/xdpW5rpihcpic.twitter.com/jo0GdLxC6s
— The Washington Times (@WashTimes) May 16, 2018
After a year of investigating, Mueller hasn’t found or produced a shred of evidence against Trump or about any alleged Russian collusion.
Trump has been cooperating with the special counsel’s office for more than a year, and it appears they are finally admitting that there’s no wrongdoing or any power to indict Trump on any charges.
The media has spent the last two years pushing endless conspiracy theories about Trump, and they have been proven wrong.
The witch hunt appears to be nearing an end, and the media and “experts” owe Trump an apology for slandering him since he won the election.
Follow Martin on Facebook.
The Inspector General's Report Will Expose the MSM as Treasonous
BY ROGER L SIMON
One of the more notable differences between Watergate and the metastasizing scandals involving the FBI, our intelligence agencies, and the Obama administration -- subjects of the soon-to-be-released inspector general's report -- is that the media exposed Watergate. They aided and abetted the current transgressions.
By providing a willing and virtually unquestioned repository for every anonymous leaker (as long as he or she was on the "right" side) in Washington and beyond, the press has evolved from being part of the solution to being a major part of the problem. Gone are the days of the true "whistle-blower." Here are the days of the special interest provocateur, shaping public opinion by passing on half-truths and outright lies to their favorite reporter. One might then even call the media, in Orwell's words, "objectively pro-fascist," functioning much in the manner of Pravda and Izvestia during that famous author's time, covertly or overtly pushing the party line in the most slavish and orthodox manner while feigning "objectivity."
CNN, NBC, the Washington Post and The New York Times -- misinforming the public as it hasn't since the days of their great Stalin-excuser Walter Duranty (still pictured on their Pulitzer wall of honor) -- are particularly egregious in this regard. But there are many others.
And the current scandal is far, far worse than Watergate, which, bad as it was, was the coverup of a completely unnecessary buffoon-like break-in during an election that was already won in a landslide. What is being exposed now is an attempt by our highest law enforcement agency working in concert with our intelligence agencies and, evidently, the blessing of the former administration itself to block the candidate of the opposing party, even to defraud and spy on him, that is to, as others have said, "set him up." And then, if they were unsuccessful, make it impossible for him to govern. In addition, in all probability, the same players conspired to make certain Hillary Clinton was not indicted for a crime for which virtually any other American would have done jail time.
Forget Donald Trump. Forget whoever is running. It could be your Aunt Fanny or Willam F. Buckley's random person from the Boston telephone directory. Forget whatever party we are talking about. This is the stuff of high treason of a type not imaginable to almost all of us in our lifetimes as American citizens. I and others have compared this plot to Lavrentiy Beria and the NKVD. At first, I admit, I was exaggerating a bit for effect. Now, not so much.
What we have here are people who think they are "good" driven to evil by their own self-righteousness.
So what will the mainstream media who participated so heavily in this, who were in effect the enabler of this disgraceful anti-democratic enterprise, do when the inspector general's report is finally published?
We may have gotten a taste in the nervous reaction of CNN's Jake Tapper to an informative series of tweets from the WSJ's Kimberley Strassel on the matter. Roughly a year ago, Mr. Tapper famously accused Donald Trump of himself being a purveyor of "fake news" for alleging he was being wiretapped (what an understatement that turned out to be!). Instead of apologizing for being wildly wrong or even acknowledging his mistake, Tapper tweaked Ms. Strassel for accidentally tweeting "Hurricane Crossfire" rather than "Crossfire Hurricane" (the name the FBI cribbed from Mick Jagger as a trendy name for their repellent activities).
Tapper is considered one of the more intelligent and putatively responsible of the MSM crew. If he is unable to face this coming press Armageddon, few will be. They bet the house that Donald Trump was the worst man in the room, but it turned out, and will be made quite explicit I would imagine, that there were many men and women far worse than he. It's not even close.
An interesting sidelight is the degree to which Watergate itself inspired the present level of reportorial corruption by launching "leaks" (i. e. Deep Throat and company) as the royal road to journalistic success, Pulitzer prizes, and Hollywood fame. In a sense, that would put journalism today in its Robespierre period, going further and further out onto a limb for a story until the limb falls off.
Whether Barack Obama himself will be looped definitively into the IG's report, we don't know at this time. But we all know where the fish rots from and we also know that Obama, despite his denials, knew well that Hillary was using an illegal server. He wrote her there himself under an assumed name, showing he was only slightly more computer savvy than John Podesta.
These next few weeks are going to be among the most interesting in our lifetimes -- especially for our friends in the press. We know from the NYT earlier this week they are preparing their excuses. Let's hope they don't have enough.
Author and screenwriter Roger L. Simon is co-founder and CEO Emeritus of PJ Media. His latest book is I Know Best: How Moral Narcissism Is Destroying Our Republic If It Hasn't Already. He tweets @rogerlsimon.
Patriots Owner Robert Kraft to Be Deposed in Colin Kaepernick Collusion Case
Patriots Owner Robert Kraft to Be Deposed in Colin Kaepernick Collusion Case
Patriots Owner Robert Kraft is the next to be deposed as Colin Kaepernick continues to push his collusion case through the adjudication process, according to Pro Football Talk.
The former San Francisco 49er quarterback is trying to prove that the NFL owners got together and secretly “colluded” to make sure he was not signed by a team after he quit the 49ers and became a free agent at the end of the 2016 season. It was that season when the outspoken player began protesting during the playing of the national anthem and Kaepernick alleges that the owners conspired to take away his freedom of speech by keeping him from playing.
Kaepernick has already compelled the appearance of Denver Broncos General Manager John Elway, Cowboys owner Jerry Jones, General Manager Ozzie Newsome and head coach John Harbaugh of the Ravens, and GM John Schneider and head coach Pete Carroll of the Seahawks.
The famed anthem protester is not the only NFL player accusing the league of “collusion.” Like Kaepernick, former 49er Eric Reid is also alleging that the league is conspiring to keep him out of pro football. Reid has field his own grievance since turning free agent after the 2017 season and finding no takers for his talents.
Bill O’Reilly and Eric Bolling could be joining Greta in return to cable news
Photo via Gil C / ShutterstockThere may be a massive shakeup about to happen in the political media world.
Reports are leaking out that Newsmax TV is seriously courting three former Fox personalities: Greta Van Susteren, Eric Bolling, and Bill O’Reilly.
Fox Under Attack
Fox News has been dominating the evening hours over its rivals.
That may soon change, however, with several channels trying to pick the fruit from the tree.
Only yesterday we reported Sinclair Broadcasting was trying to woo Hannity away from Fox.
Now, Newsmax TV is looking to add some former personalities of the network to face off against Fox for prime time ratings.
Bill O’Reilly regularly had some of the strongest ratings for the network.
O’Reilly was let go amid misconduct allegations, and Tucker Carlson took his coveted spot.
Van Susteren was also a hit with viewers, but left when Fox News upper level management was facing sexual misconduct allegations.
Eric Bolling, formerly a key member of “The Five,” was also let go by the network, but still has a very loyal following on social media.
If Newsmax is able to land all three personalities, it would immediately become a large player in the political news media world.
Fox Falling
As it stands now, Fox News is untouchable from about 4:00pm through the 11:00pm time slots.
The network is absolutely blowing CNN right out of the water and while MSNBC is making a little noise in some of those spots, Fox still leads them at every time slot.
That would no doubt change dramatically if Newsmax makes this move.
Most pundits are predicting the assault with Van Susteren anchoring national news at 6:00pm.
Right now, Fox dominates that spot with Brett Baier.
Van Susteren would most likely stay on for another hour to host her own show, then have O’Reilly face off directly against Tucker Carlson.
That would leave Hannity, if he remains with Fox, facing off against his old buddy Eric Bolling.
Laura Ingraham could also find her 10:00 pm slot in a battle if Newsmax lands Sean Spicer, who the network is also reportedly courting.
While all of this is bad news for Fox, it is great news for conservatives looking for another outlet.
Shooters Aren’t Shooting Up the Sheriff’s Office – They Go ‘Where There Is No Self-Defense’
During an interview with the Fox News Channel on Friday, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) argued that schools can’t be defenseless and disturbed shooters “aren’t so disturbed that they’re going to shoot up the sheriff’s office. They’re showing up where there is no self-defense.”
Rand said, “I think the first thing we should do is, there needs to be an announcement by every school district that we’re going to defend our children, and that we’re not going to have a sign outside that [says], ‘We’re defenseless.’ And I think that’s the problem, is that we do have these homicidal or crazy or mentally disturbed kids, but they still aren’t so disturbed that they’re going to shoot up the sheriff’s office. They’re showing up where there is no self-defense.”
He added, “I think we get distracted. We start talking about something that Republicans and Democrats disagree with on gun control. … Look, every Hollywood actor that hates guns has armed bodyguards defending them. So, they hate guns unless the guns are defending them. Let’s announce tomorrow and let’s encourage everybody who protects our kids, superintendents, principals, school boards, announce tomorrow we’re not going to leave our kids defenseless. We are going to defend our schools from crazy people with guns.”
Rand also argued that we need to try to stop people who have psychiatric disorders that cause them to act violently and prevent people who are crazy from getting firearms. He further said there isn’t enough work being done to keep people who are mentally unstable or breaking the law from having guns.
Follow Ian Hanchett on Twitter @IanHanchett
NRA's Loesch Calls on Media to Stop 'Creating' Mass Shooting 'Monsters'
By Wanda Carruthers
NRA's Loesch Calls on Media to Stop 'Creating' Mass Shooting 'Monsters'
By Wanda Carruthers
NRA spokeswoman Dana Loesch (Jacquelyn Martin/AP)National Rifle Association (NRA) spokeswoman Dana Loesch called on the media to stop "creating" mass shooters by their extensive coverage of suspects following incidents of attacks, The Hill reported Saturday.
While recognizing a need to report events "responsibly," Loesch cautioned against "oversaturation."
"#MSM has got to stop creating more of these monsters by oversaturation. I'm not saying don't responsibly report on things as they happen. I understand it. But constantly showing the image of the murderer, constantly saying their name, is completely unnecessary," Loesch tweeted via the NRATV Twitter account.
Loesch made the statement on Friday following the mass shooting at a high school in Santa Fe, Texas. Ten people died and another ten were injured in the attack.
Police arrested 17-year-old suspect Dimitrios Pagourtzis, a student at the school, who has been charged with capital murder and aggravated assault on a public service.
Another student was detained as a person of interest in the attack, but it is not clear what connection they might have had to Friday's shooting.
Ciao…….Helen and Moe Lauzier
Thus articles
that is all articles
This time, hopefully can provide benefits to you all. Okay, see you in another article post.
You are now reading the article the link address https://fairyforreference.blogspot.com/2018/05/www_20.html
0 Response to " "
Post a Comment