FAIRY FOR CHILDREN

- Hallo friend FAIRY FOR CHILDREN, In the article you read this time with the title , we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article adventure, Article animation, Article fantasy, Article The latest, Article wit, we write can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title :
link :

http://ift.tt/2ihVQGgT. COM
Sat. Sept.9, 2017

~All Gave Some~Some Gave All~ God Bless America~

 

Bannon Rips Catholic Church, Says Bishops Want ‘Unlimited Illegal Immigration’

By Daily Caller

Former White House strategist Steve Bannon denounced the Catholic Church’s position on the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, accusing church leaders of having an “economic interest” in continued illegal immigration.

In a wide ranging interview with Charlie Rose of CBS, set to air Sunday on “60 Minutes,” Bannon blasted the Church for condemning the Trump administration’s decision to wind down the DACA program.

“The bishops have been terrible about this,” Bannon, himself a Catholic, told Rose. “By the way, you know why? You know why? Because [they’re] unable to really come to grips with the problems in the Church, they need illegal aliens, they need illegal aliens to fill the churches.”

Following Trump’s decision Tuesday to wind down DACA, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) called the move “reprehensible” and vowed to support the program’s beneficiaries.

“Today, our nation has done the opposite of how Scripture calls us to respond,” the bishops said in a statement. “It is a step back from the progress that we need to make as a country.”

While the USCCB alluded to a higher authority in its support of DACA, Bannon accused the Church of a more earthly motivation.

“They [the bishops] have an economic interest in unlimited immigration, unlimited illegal immigration,” he said.

Bannon was known as one of the voices inside the Trump administration pushing for tougher policies in immigration. While he disagrees with Trump’s decision not to cancel DACA outright, Bannon says he understands why the president shifted the burden of deciding the program’s fate to lawmakers.

“Look, what he did on DACA the other day — okay, I don’t agree with that DACA decision, but I understand how he struggled with it, I understand how he’s giving the possibility of a legislative thing,” he said.

Liberal Reporter Attacks Sarah Huckabee For “Cold Hearted” DACA Decision – The Room Exploded At Her Answer

If you didn’t already know the media was biased, watch what happens to Sarah Huckabee Sanders during a discussion about President Donald Trump’s decision to end Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

Kristen Welker of NBC News, sounding more like an activist than a reporter, confronted Sanders on the decision:”“The president vowed to treat DREAMers with ‘great heart. “How is this treating them with ‘great heart’?”

Sanders immediately shot back with an extraordinary answer: “I think by allowing an orderly process to take place. You know, there’s a lot of people that I’ve seen attacking the president for not showing the level of compassion that they feel like he should.”

She continued, “To me, the most heartless thing that I’ve seen all day today is that Democrats like Nancy Pelosi are using this decision today for fundraising while the president’s trying to fix this situation. They are politicizing an issue instead of actually doing their job. If they would spend less time fundraising and more time focusing on solutions, we wouldn’t even be in this problem in the first place.”

As a follow-up question, Welker replied, “DREAMers, supporters of DREAMers, say this is ‘coldhearted,’ ‘you’re leaving the future of 800,000 people uncertain, up in the air.’ What is your message to them?”

Then, Sanders explained the facts: “It’s not cold hearted for the president to uphold the law. We are a nation of law and order, and the day that we start to ignore the fact that we are that, then we throw away everything that gives these people a reason to want to come to our country.”

She concluded with a message that visibly upset liberal reporters in the room:

“But we want to have real solutions. We want to have laws that address these problems, but it’s Congress’s job to legislate, not the president’s. And we actually want to uphold the Constitution, and I think people across this country should be celebrating the fact that they have a president that is standing up and upholding the Constitution as he was elected to do.”

Well said! America is a nation of laws, and breaking the law should matter. America is a free society that offers hope to immigrants, but Constitutional order and our laws must be preserved. Isn’t it sad that Democrats don’t agree?

Here’s the Scoop on Why Planned Parenthood ‘Won’ a Medical Prize

The Lasker Award this year went to the longtime abortion provider — and it's no accident at all

by Katie Nations

The Lasker Awards are known as “America’s Nobels.” They recognize major contributions made to the world of medicine — but this year the awards instead have made a political statement.

Eighty-six Lasker Award recipients have also won the Nobel. This year, in what could be interpreted as a political move, the 2017 Lasker-Bloomberg Public Service Award winner is — drumroll — Planned Parenthood.

The two organizations, the Lasker Foundation and Planned Parenthood, have a significant history together. Mary and Albert Lasker, the Lasker Award namesakes, actually sat on the board of the American Birth Control League before it became the Planned Parenthood Foundation of America in 1942.

Albert Lasker, in fact, suggested the name Planned Parenthood. The Laskers personally knew Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, and supported her belief "that women’s welfare — and that of their families — depended on their ability to decide whether and when to have children."

In addition to the award given to Planned Parenthood this year, the 2017 Lasker-Debakey Clinical Medical Research Award was given to the creators of the HPV vaccine. Coincidentally, Planned Parenthood offers the HPV vaccine as one of its services.

The Lasker Foundation touts many numbers in regard to Planned Parenthood in its announcement of the award, including the numbers of clinics across the country and the millions of people who have been "helped" by the implied generosity and mission of Planned Parenthood. But there is no mention whatsoever of the number of abortions performed in total by the organization or on a year-to-year basis. There's no comment at all on the price paid for human-baby body parts.

Unrelated to the awards, Planned Parenthood says it performed 323,999 abortions in the year 2014. It claims that abortion only makes up 3 percent of its provided services. But the reality is that 323,999 lives were ended in 2014 alone. That is 887 abortions per day. And 323,999 is approximately the population of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Yet Planned Parenthood is lauded "for providing essential health services and reproductive care to millions of women for more than a century."

Joy Villa on Her Role with the Trump Campaign and Her Time in Houston

'That's America,' explains the musician in a revealing interview with LifeZette about hope, help — and humanity

by Zachary Leeman

It’s only been seven months since musician Joy Villa announced to the world and her industry that she supported President Donald Trump. At the Grammy Awards in February, she wore her by-now iconic dress that sported the president’s “Make America Great Again” slogan, earning plenty of attention — and not all of it good.

Villa has since released best-selling music, including a song entitled “Make America Great Again,” pushed her beliefs through social media and talk shows, and connected with fans. She even recently flew to Houston, Texas (along with fellow musician Kaya Jones) to help in the Harvey relief efforts there.

Recording artist who wore the Trump dress at the Grammys...

It’s been a long journey in a short amount of time for her — one that will not be ending any time soon. Villa has an exciting new step to add to her adventure as an artist and commentator, which she announced on Twitter Wednesday night: She'll now be an official member of the Advisory Board for President Trump’s Campaign.

Joy Villa ✔@Joy_Villa

I'm so proud to announce I'm OFFICIALLY a member of the Advisory Board for President Trump's Campaign!

2:05 AM - Sep 6, 2017

“It feels like it’s been years,” Villa told LifeZette exclusively about all that’s happened since she donned her headline-making dress. “So much has happened in that time.”

Villa said she is still “being briefed” on her duties as a member of the Trump Campaign’s Advisory Board, but she knows thus far she'll be doing a lot more media to help push the president’s agenda — and to keep the public informed.

“Part of my duties will be to know what the president is doing before a lot of the public knows,” Villa said, adding that inside knowledge about White House events will allow her to better inform people of the good that is happening. “Making sure the good news gets out” is how she sums up part of her work.

In her effort to do more media, Villa said she wants to expand beyond outlets like Fox News — she and Kaya Jones recently closed out an episode of Sean Hannity’s program — and move into networks such as CNN and MSNBC to better let detractors of the president know of the good Trump is doing.

Beyond that, Villa will be “possibly spearheading some events,” which could include rallies as the campaign puts on and produces many of them. She may also work "directly with the campaign [to get] ready for 2020,” when Trump will presumably run for reelection.

As a supporter of the president, she said she's most looking forward to a moment of “stability” for the U.S. “This country needs stability more than ever,” she said, noting the need is felt everywhere from the economy to the military.

She added that cultural and political stability will give citizens more freedom to “create, build, and grow.”

Along with her new duties on the Advisory Board, Villa has been busy in Houston helping victims of Harvey. She's been working through the charity Mercury One; she and Kaya Jones have helped raise over $2 million for Houston.

When asked about helping and interacting with people affected by the hurricane, Villa paused and said, “It was intense ... at times terrifying, tragic, devastating."

The artist described the heartbreak of seeing the devastation around her. She said she smelled “putrid water, dead animals, mold coming off the houses, air is dank –– you feel the loss of all those homes.”

However, the singer also has a renewed sense of hope — people inspired her and showed the best of America, she said. Villa said she saw “people holding hands in prayer, people helping other people despite their homes being destroyed. That’s America.”

For one video done through Periscope and posted to Villa’s social media, she asked a woman what she most wanted to tell the rest of America. “Please tell them it’s [destruction] much worse than you could ever imagine,” Villa recalled the woman saying.

What shocked her most was what the woman said next. “Please let America know we are not racist,” Villa remembers the woman saying — a woman who was nearly in tears and who was flying the Confederate flag in her yard. “She and others were saying, ‘We have neighbors of all colors. We love each other. We’re not thinking of race. We’re thinking of humanity.’”

Villa added, “Even when they’re fighting for their lives, they still want that message to come out because they know what the news is saying that about them.”

Her interactions with the people of Houston, she said, show that the stereotypes and divisiveness pushed in the media are hurting the country more than some may think. Villa said, “That’s tearing apart the country more than any hurricane ever could," said Villa.

To help in Joy Villa’s Harvey relief efforts, donate here.

Trump Tells DACA Recipients Not to Worry

Cortney O'Brien

President Trump may have ended DACA as we know it, but he assured recipients that they have "nothing to worry about" during the six-month window he's given Congress to fix it.

Donald J. Trump

✔@realDonaldTrump

For all of those (DACA) that are concerned about your status during the 6 month period, you have nothing to worry about - No action!

9:42 AM - Sep 7, 2017

Attorney General Jeff Sessions was the messenger who delivered DACA's fate earlier this week. President Obama's decision to enact the program via executive action in 2012 was "unlawful" and cannot stand, Sessions said. It will be "rescinded."

Democrats and Republicans alike have defended DACA, arguing that youth whose parents brought them here illegally should not be the ones who face punishment. Others use the economic argument - that taking away 800,000 work permits can be extremely costly over the next decade.

Representatives like Luis Gutiérrez (D-IL) are taking out their frustration on White House senior staff. He will reject any funding bill that does not protect DREAMers, and will urge his colleagues to do the same.

Some lawmakers like Rep. Sean Duffy (R-WI) however, are thanking President Trump for his "compassion" in giving Congress a six-month window to try and make DACA constitutional.

Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ) reminded his irate colleagues that President Obama is the one he should be angry with, considering he gave young illegal immigrants false hope.

Rep. Trent Franks

✔@RepTrentFranks

Obama admin should be criticized for putting children in danger -- coaching them to cross treacherous desert for a disingenuous promise.

9:41 AM - Sep 6, 2017

Trump sidesteps roadblock of Republicans
By Charles Hurt - The Washington Times

The swamp gets sloshed! Republicans stunned! GOP reeling! Blindsided!

Blindsided? Seriously?

President Trump cuts a dirty little deal with Democrats and the swamp rats are surprised? They scurry for cover like cockroaches when the lights flick on.

Holy frog juice, these people are even dumber than we thought. These swamp denizens are even more delusional than we thought.

And these people are supposed to be political experts.

The hopeless debt-addled addicts in Congress got sent to rehab after last November’s intervention election, and ever since they keep promising they really learned their lesson this time. Now we find they are still doped up — meth-rotted teeth, glassy-eyed — and still shooting up treasury ink.

Rep. Kevin Cramer, North Dakota Republican, said he “gasped” when he learned of Mr. Trump’s deal with the devilish Democrats.

“Wow,” he said. “I was at dinner last night where that was not in anybody’s dream.”

Former Senate GOP leader Trent Lott cringed over how “embarrassing” it was to have the president lay bare such a split with Republicans in Congress.

Somebody needs to reread “The Masque of the Red Death.”

We have on our hands an economic, bureaucratic and political plague, and these people in the swamp are still clutching their pearls, gasping into their lace gloves and fretting over proper manners at the garden party that went broke long, long ago.

Let’s review: Since the start of the year, President Trump has tried working with Republicans. He gave them a sterling, phenomenal Supreme Court justice.

Despite all the venom from so many Republicans in Washington during last year’s general election, Mr. Trump helped the party keep seats in all four special elections where Republicans competed.

And despite the acrimony, Mr. Trump has been generous in explaining to Washington Republicans all the things that matter most to actual voters in America. He has worked strenuously to make good on the promises that got him — and many Republicans — elected last year.

For their part, Republicans refuse to hear Mr. Trump’s advice. They backstab him and leak fake stories to the fake media about his White House.

They join in with the barking, mouth-frothing hyenas to investigate this Russia canard and threaten the president’s family and personal fortune.

They call him a racist because he — rightly — called out the leftist thugs who agitate for a race war in this country.

And, finally, these syphilitic Washington Republicans are, apparently, constitutionally incapable of actually accomplishing anything.

Forget that Mr. Trump got elected promising to repeal Obamacare. Republicans have won four straight elections on that very same promise!

And they can’t even get that done, even as Mr. Trump stands at the end of Pennsylvania Avenue, holding his pen, weeping ink.

Yet these bozos are surprised that Mr. Trump finally had enough and is now playing footsie with Democrats?

And these are the “good guys” in Washington. Dear Lord, help us!

Charles Hurt can be reached at churt@washingtontimes.com and on Twitter, @charleshurt.

Trey Gowdy’s Stunning Move Left Robert Mueller Speechless

Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation hinges on one question.

Did the Trump campaign collude with Russia?

But Trey Gowdy just made a move that could answer that question once-and-for-all.

The collusion narrative gained traction in the media when BuzzFeed published the unverified Christopher Steele dossier.

The memo – commissioned by the mysterious Fusion GPS – claimed Russia had compromising information on Trump and that his campaign colluded with Russia to rig the 2016 election.

But what were the origins of the dossier?

Who paid for it?

Was Fusion GPS also being paid by the Russian government when they commissioned the memo?

And was Steele on the FBI payroll when he put this document together – and did the Bureau use the document as the basis for their counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign’s ties with Russia?

These are serious questions currently being stonewalled by both the FBI and Fusion GPS.

Now the House Intelligence Committee – which Trey Gowdy is a member – has subpoenaed documents they believe will shed light on these matters.

The Washington Examiner reports:

In the most significant escalation yet in the wrangling between Congress and the FBI over the Trump dossier, the House Intelligence Committee has subpoenaed the bureau and the Justice Department for documents relating to the dossier, the FBI’s relationship with dossier author Christopher Steele, and the bureau’s possible role in supporting what began as an opposition research project against candidate Donald Trump in the final months of last year’s presidential campaign.

The subpoenas are an indication of growing frustration inside the committee over the FBI and Justice Department’s lack of cooperation in the Trump-Russia investigation.

The committee issued the subpoenas — one to the FBI, an identical one to the Justice Department — on August 24, giving both until last Friday, September 1, to turn over the information.

Neither FBI nor Justice turned over the documents, and now the committee has given them an extension until September 14 to comply.

Illustrating the seriousness with which investigators view the situation, late Tuesday the committee issued two more subpoenas, specifically to FBI Director Christopher Wray and Attorney General Jeff Sessions, directing them to appear before the committee to explain why they have not provided the subpoenaed information.”

Trey Gowdy explained why these documents are so crucial.

The Examiner also reports:

“We got nothing,” said committee member Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., who is taking a leading role in the Russia investigation. “The witnesses have not been produced and the documents have not been produced.”

In a telephone interview Tuesday, Gowdy said the FBI has said it needed more time to comply, and also that complying might interfere with the investigation of special counsel Robert Mueller. Whatever the reason, the documents haven’t been produced.

“A subpoena is a tool of last resort in Congress,” Gowdy, a former federal prosecutor, said.

Like investigators with the Senate Judiciary Committee, who are also pursuing information about the dossier, the House committee wants to know the origin of the FBI’s involvement in the creation of the document. They are particularly interested to know whether the FBI or Justice Department ever presented information from the dossier — unverified, possibly from paid informants — to a court as a basis for obtaining a surveillance warrant in the Russia investigation.

“I want to know the extent to which it was relied upon, if at all, by any of our intelligence agencies or federal law enforcement agencies,” Gowdy said, “and to the extent it was relied upon, how did they vet, or either corroborate or contradict, the information in it?”

Gowdy’s answer is revealing.

The Bureau cited Mueller’s investigation as a reason they have not yet produced the documents.

But if the documents show the whole investigation was based on a fake news memo – or that the FBI paid the man who put this together, it would drive a stake through the heart of Mueller’s probe.

Kentucky Claims Lax Enforcement Allowed Abortion Facilities to Ignore Safety Laws

Operation Rescue By Cheryl Sullenger

Planned Parenthood grills inspector general in day 2 Louisville abortion clinic trial

Louisville, KY – In a case of national importance, two

Kentucky abortion facilities are in Federal Court in an attempt to argue that enforcement of state laws requiring hospital transfer agreements is a political and religious ploy to “make abortion illegal in Kentucky,” according to Brigitte Amiri, an ACLU attorney for EMW Women’s Center, the last active abortion facility in the state.

But Steve Pitt, an attorney who represents Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin, a pro-life supporter, insists that claim is simply untrue.

“There is absolutely no political or religious consideration here. This is a question of safety and health,” he said.

If the state is successful, it could close EMW’s Louisville abortion business, making Kentucky the first abortion-free state since the 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision that decriminalized abortion in America and would be considered a huge victory for the pro-life movement.

State officials under Gov. Bevin claim that after Planned Parenthood in Louisville began conducting abortions without a license in December 2015, they began to realize that the hospital transfer agreement provision of the facility licensing law had never been properly enforced under previous administrations.

Pitt says the abortion businesses were given every opportunity to comply with the law.

As a result, EMW Women’s Clinic in Lexington was closed and the Louisville Planned Parenthood was forced to halt abortions. The Louisville EMW Women’s Clinic was also ordered to close in March, but instead joined with Planned Parenthood in filing suit against the Bevin Administration.

“Most states are either not motivated or completely afraid to enforce laws that affect abortion facilities. Even when we catch them in the act of breaking the law and can prove it, enforcement remains our greatest challenge,” said Troy Newman, President of Operation Rescue. “Gov. Matt Bevin has been a breath of fresh air that takes enforcement of Kentucky laws seriously. There are many states currently controlled by pro-life administrations that must find the courage to follow Kentucky’s lead and act swiftly to enforce state laws. Those facilities that cannot comply should not expect exemption from proper enforcement.”

Newman believes that if the state laws currently on the books were simply enforced, most abortion facilities in America would be forced to close.

The trial, which is in its third day of testimony, is expected to conclude today. Any ruling on the case is expected to take weeks or even months.

No, Eric Holder, The Dreamers Aren’t Americans. That’s The Point

Citizenship is not defined by one’s mindset, but by law. That's the whole reason we're even having this discussion.

By Daniel Payne

Yesterday former attorney general Eric Holder emerged from whatever half-lit Sicilian restaurant in which he currently practices law to lecture Americans about our immigration system.

“Our nation’s sense of morality—and of itself—is once again being tested,” he wrote in the Washington Post, accusing President Donald Trump of “turning away from the principles that indeed made America great” by repealing President Obama’s executive order allowing the children of illegal immigrants to stay in the United States. “If we are to remain true to our heritage and who we claim to be,” Holder writes, “we must stand with the dreamers.”

It is an irony for the ages: Eric Holder has no problem shipping illegal firearms across the Mexican border, but he positively cannot fathom doing the same thing to illegal immigrants.

Dreamers Are Not Citizens, Or We Wouldn’t Be Talking

In truth, the question of what to do with the children of illegal immigrants—the so-called “dreamers”—is a difficult one, insofar as those children are illegal immigrants themselves through no fault of their own, and we might consider whether it makes moral sense, at the very least, to ship them back to countries which they may barely know. This is a question on which Congress should spend considerable and careful time.

But Eric Holder nevertheless gets it wrong, as he is wont to do. “I’m calling on all Americans to see and treat dreamers as our own,” he writes, “because they are our own.” These individuals “should not be defined by their immigration status,” he claims. He quotes President Obama, who says that the dreamers are Americans “in their hearts, in their minds, in every single way but one: on paper.”

Well, gee, thanks for pointing out the obvious, professor.

Indeed, Obama gets it right: the dreamers are not Americans “on paper,” and so in that one profoundly critical way they are not Americans at all. That was the point of DACA in the first place: to offer deferred deportation to non-Americans. Natural-born and naturalized citizens of the United States were not the ones who took advantage of Obama’s executive order: it was illegal immigrants, non-citizens, that did so. It is not Trump who “defined them by their immigration status.” It was Obama.

Citizenship Matters, Whether We Like It Or Not

It is grating to have to point this out, though the deficiencies of our immigration debate tend to make it necessary to do so. We are, after all, a nation; as a nation we are composed primarily of a body politic made up of citizens. There are a great many among us who desire, in various incoherent ways, to do away with such distinctions—people who believe that simply arriving here, through whatever means, should qualify one for citizenship. Such a policy would essentially do away with the idea of citizenship altogether, rendering our country’s immigration policy to be the legislative equivalent of John Lennon’s turgid “Imagine.”

We are not, as a rule, obliged to seriously consider such college-freshman proposals regarding serious and important domestic policy. But the question of citizenship is nonetheless a profoundly vital one, and the way we respond to the problem of the dreamers is of profound import.

There are good reasons for providing them a path to citizenship. But, much as it might pain Mark Zuckerberg to admit it, there are good reasons for deporting them, as well—chief among them the question of whether or not, as a matter of national policy, we want to incentivize and reward making immigrant children into emotional and political hostages. The illegal immigrant children of illegal immigrants are not, in the traditional moral sense, criminals, and should not be morally seen as such—but they are, nevertheless, inhabiting the United States actus reus, in the status of criminals if not the intent.

The intent, of course, is a critical component of our law—and in crafting a permanent solution to Barack Obama’s flimsy executive order, our lawmakers should give careful consideration to the fact that the dreamers did not intend to break the law when they came here with their parents. Just the same, the idea that these young men and women “should not be defined by their immigration status” is a fallacy, and a dangerous one at that. We are all, in the eyes of the law, “defined by our immigration status.” The dreamers are no different, nor should they be.

Daniel Payne is a senior contributor at the Federalist. He is an assistant editor for The College Fix, the news magazine of the Student Free Press Association. Daniel's work has appeared in outlets such as National Review Online, Reason, Front Porch Republic, and elsewhere. His personal blog can be found at Trial of the Century. He lives in Virginia.

G’ day…Ciao…
Helen and Moe Lauzier

Thus articles

that is all articles This time, hopefully can provide benefits to you all. Okay, see you in another article post.

You are now reading the article the link address https://fairyforreference.blogspot.com/2017/09/httpift_8.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: