FAIRY FOR CHILDREN

- Hallo friend FAIRY FOR CHILDREN, In the article you read this time with the title , we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article adventure, Article animation, Article fantasy, Article The latest, Article wit, we write can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title :
link :

http://ift.tt/2onj0IO.

Thurs. Aug.17, 2017

~All Gave Some~Some Gave All~ God Bless America~

Personal Note: I expect to be out of commission for the next few days. If all goes well I’ll be back here early next week.  

Ciao…….Moe Lauzier

Ronald Kessler: Dems Pulling a Neville Chamberlain With NKorea

By Greg Richter  

Democrats are likely to pay dearly at the ballot box in 2018 for their reaction to threats from North Korea, The New York Times bestselling author Ronald Kessler told Newmax TV.

Kessler, appearing Monday on "Newsmax Now," told host Bill Tucker that Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez was not in sync with voters when he criticized President Donald Trump for tweeting threats to North Korean leader Kim Jong Un over the country's nuclear program.

"Most Americans do want a strong defense," said Kessler, author of "The First Family Detail." "They don't want to be wiped out by a country like North Korea."

But more astounding than Perez's words, he said, was the statement by Susan Rice, President Barack Obama's former chief of national security, who said the United States should just grow used to North Korea having nuclear weapons as it did with the Soviet Union.

"Well, there's an astounding difference between the Soviet leaders who were very rational, didn't want to be killed themselves, didn't want to be wiped out, versus the North Korean leader," Kessler said. "To say that we should just tolerate North Korea is suicidal."

Much like British Prime Minister Chamberlain's ill-fated appeasement approach with Nazi Germany, "if we don't take action now, it's going to be too late," Kessler said.

McAuliffe's actions in Charlottesville under fire, independent review demanded

by Paul Bedard

Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe's actions before and after the deadly weekend race clashes in Charlottesville are coming under fire amid calls for an independent review to determine if politics played a role.

Former Republican Virginia Gov. Jim Gilmore on Tuesday raised new questions about Richmond's involvement in the riots the claimed three lives and said the public "needs to know" if the state and city had taken the proper precautions to avoid the clashes and if police were told to stand down.

In an interview with Secrets, he dismissed McAuliffe's call for an internal review. Instead, Gilmore, who was a presidential candidate in 2016, said that an independent group must be charged with the investigation, taking it out of the governor's office.

"This has to be an independent review. We have to know what the governor did, how he participated in it, whether he was part of the meetings, whether he had a meeting, whether the secretary of public safety was in the meeting, where it was held, was it in Richmond or Charlottesville, what planning was done, and what constraints if any were put on the police," said Gilmore, a former Virginia attorney general and county attorney.

Gilmore, president of the American Opportunity Foundation, formerly known as the Free Congress Foundation, said, "While we support the police, we know they do a good job, we don't know what direction they got at the time of the Charlottesville riots."

Several reports have said that the police stood by as white supremacists and their foes faced off in fights. Others said that when the violence escalated, unprepared police had to leave to get proper equipment.

Gilmore also said there was a report that some police were "asked to stand aside and be more passive."

He added, "They didn't have a plan to separate these groups. The governor seems to be blaming everybody else."

Gilmore said, "You have to have a fore-knowledge of what is ready to happen and a plan in place to be able to deal with it so the police can carry out the plan. In this case the was no plan apparently to divide these people from one to the other. We need to know, we need to be advised as to what action was taken or not taken."

In a televised statement Saturday, McAuliffe seemed to blame the white hate groups for the violence, but he later blamed the ACLU which sued to keep the protest in downtown Charlottesville.

Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner's "Washington Secrets" columnist, can be contacted at pbedard@washingtonexaminer.com

How Reagan Handled Attempts to Tie Him to Hate
Trump can learn something about how to heal racial division from the last populist GOP president

by Jim Stinson

• 

Long before President Donald Trump was accused of catering to racists, showing racial insensitivity, and other moral crimes, Ronald Reagan faced similar accusations as a governor, as a candidate, and as a president.

Former President Reagan was often the subject of invective accusing him of the worst sort of motives, including racism and hatred — incendiary accusations much like those Trump has endured since he declared his candidacy in 2015.

Trump has struggled to shrug off the attacks and reinvigorated a media firestorm Tuesday afternoon over his willingness to condemn white nationalists with a meandering and poorly advised press conference.

Perhaps the president can learn a lesson in how to deal with the explosive issue of race from his most recent, populist predecessor.

For Reagan, when his hand was forced, he would forcefully rebut the charges, according to Craig Shirley, a top Reagan biographer and author of the recent biography, "Citizen Newt: The Making of a Reagan Conservative."

Reagan also did not hesitate to denounce racism and its practitioners, Shirley told LifeZette on Tuesday.

The 1980 Campaign Kickoff

On Aug. 3, 1980, Reagan attended the Neshoba County Fair in Mississippi. Some at the time — and still, to this day — call this the campaign kickoff.

It wasn't, says Shirley. Reagan had already kicked off his campaign in Liberty State Park in New Jersey, with the Statue of Liberty in the background.

The proximity of the fair to Philadelphia, Mississippi — where three civil rights workers were killed in 1964 — was used by The New York Times and others to bash Reagan. Reagan attended the fair and spoke of states' rights as a sort of dog whistle to racists in the South, the hostile media narrative went.

The slur still lingers in liberal echo chambers, such as the op-ed pages of The Times. But Shirley notes the fair is one of the biggest political events in Mississippi. Reagan's opponent, Democratic President Jimmy Carter, had won Mississippi in 1976, and it made sense for Reagan to go there.

To this day, there is almost no explanation in screeds against Reagan that the fair is a big political draw. Indeed, the fair's website notes that the fair got a reputation as a must-attend political event when the governor spoke there in 1896. Over the years, the fair drew "Ronald Reagan, Jack Kemp and Sen. John Glenn [the Ohio Democrat]." Shirley notes that liberal Democrat Mike Dukakis, of Massachusetts, also went there in 1988.

Reagan handled the whole controversy by focusing campaign attention on winning over black voters and speaking at the Urban League, Shirley said. Reagan easily defeated President Jimmy Carter on Nov. 4, 1980.

The Ku Klux Klan

The Ku Klux Klan endorsed Reagan for re-election in 1984. As usual, the endorsement was used against Reagan in much the same way a Klan endorsement was used against Trump in 2016.

Reagan responded by "ripping them apart,"said Shirley. Reagan wrote to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, and denounced the Klan.

''Those of us in public life can only resent the use of our names by those who seek political recognition for the repugnant doctrines of hate they espouse," Reagan wrote. "The politics of racial hatred and religious bigotry practiced by the Klan and others have no place in this country, and are destructive of the values for which America has always stood.''

Reagan went on to resoundingly defeat former Vice President Walter Mondale, a Democrat.

By the time he left office in 1989, Reagan had an approval rating of above 40 percent among black voters, according to Shirley, "which is astonishing for a post-Eisenhower Republican."

Reagan was also the subject of many cheap shots throughout his political career, some of which he wisely ignored.

In 1966, Reagan first ran for California governor. Incumbent Gov. Edmund "Pat" Brown, a Democrat and the father of current California Gov. Jerry Brown, compared Reagan, then a retired actor, to John Wilkes Booth, the actor who killed President Abraham Lincoln. The Brown campaign never recovered. Reagan unseated Brown by a 15-point margin.

Trump Can Look to Reagan

Trump can and should look to Reagan's numerous examples on racial healing — there are many — as he tries to handle the fallout from violence at the Charlottesville, Virginia, white nationalist rally on Saturday that led to the death of three Americans.

"He's got to embrace the police investigation, and he ought to meet with African-American leaders," said Shirley. "He ought to give a national speech on race relations. He's got to reach out."

Trump made several promises to black voters, such as rebuilding inner cities and bringing job opportunities to poor areas. He needs to begin making that happen, Shirley advised.

On Tuesday, after Shirley spoke to LifeZette, Trump gave a press conference in Trump Tower in which he appeared to, again, blame "both sides" for the Charlottesville, Virginia, tragedy. It did not go over well with pundits.

"He's taking on water," said Shirley. "That all needs to change."

---

President Donald Trump’s response to the violence in Charlottesville, Virginia on Saturday was…

“We condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides, on many sides."

So the president, as he has numerous times in the past, condemned hatred, bigotry and violence.  But that wasn’t good enough for the Trump-haters who whined, kvetched, moaned and complained that he didn’t specifically single out “white supremecists” or the KKK in his condemnation.

As Monica Crowley noted on FOX News Monday night…

“No matter what Donald Trump says or does at any given moment, it is never going to be enough.”

But as happens so often, it turns out President Trump was right and the critics were wrong.

There WAS blame on both sides.  There WERE people who infiltrated the counter-protestors and perpetrated violence.  And just as not all of the counter-protesters were violent alt-left agitators, not all of the protestors were white supremacists.

You don’t have to be a racist to object to the rewriting of American history by removing Civil War statues that have stood for over a hundred years.  And you don’t have to remove a statue of Robert E. Lee to put up a statue of Frederick Douglas or Harriet Tubman right next to him.

The indisputable fact remains that there has been considerable hate, bigotry and violence from the alt-left side of the political spectrum, as well. Especially when a conservative speaker is scheduled to appear on a liberal college campus!

And while the KKK wears white hoods to hide their identity, the alt-left wears black masks.  Take a look…

Funny how you never seem to hear the Fake News Media, especially CNN, screaming at Democrats to condemn the violence of left-wing extremist groups such as Antifa and Black Lies Matter.  Talk about selective outrage.

Just another symptom of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Cheers.

Dr. Chuck Muth, PsD
Professor of Psephology (homeschooled)
Nevada’s #1 Irritator of Liberals and RINOs

SPORTS

I thought maybe NFL owners – who have refused to hire anti-cop/America-hating quarterback Colin Kaepernick this season - had learned their lesson; that allowing pampered multi-millionaire players to disrespect the National Anthem before games without penalty was extremely offensive and an insult to the league’s fans in the stands who pay everyone’s salary.

Then the Oakland Raiders’ Marshawn Lynch opted last weekend to sit on his keister munching on a banana while the Star Spangled banner played.  And that spit-in-the-eye was followed up by Seattle’s Michael Bennett, who also refused to stand with the rest of his teammates.

Worse, the coaches of both teams have defended these spoiled, ungrateful, disrespectful jerks.

Fine.  It’s a free country.  The NFL can tolerate this insulting behavior if it so chooses.  And I can so choose to once again boycott the NFL this season. Won’t cost me a dime.  Actually, it’ll save me a few.  

Problem solved.

The Vatican’s American Problem

A controversial article about hate in this country has raised eyebrows — and it's been insufficiently condemned in secular circles

by Conrad Black

A recent article in La Civilta Cattolica (Catholic Civilization) — a Vatican Jesuit publication whose contents are to some extent approved by the senior entourage of the pope — is accusing the United States of being influenced by an unholy alliance between Roman Catholic reactionaries and evangelicals. It is also tossing off a number of other flippant and outrageous reflections on the political course of the West — and it’s been insufficiently condemned in American secular circles.

The article in question was co-authored by the editor, Antonio Spadaro, S.J., and by Presbyterian pastor Marcelo Figueroa, whom the pope installed as the Argentinian editor of Osservatore Romano, the official Vatican newspaper. It claimed to find an “ecumenism of hate” in the United States based on the solidarity of reactionaries in the Roman Catholic Church and various evangelical churches — and imputed to this axis a great and almost satanic influence.

It was a scandalous misrepresentation of contemporary and historic facts, starting with the spurious allegation that the obscure website Church Militant and a couple of clerical outliers are driving the Roman Catholic Church in the U.S. into an alliance with Protestant heirs to the Ku Klux Klan (though the Klan, mercifully, is not mentioned).

The burden of the article is that the pan-Christian far right of America, which supposedly influenced Ronald Reagan, led the George W. Bush administration, and now has sired the Trump phenomenon, champions a Manichean view of the world that is little better than the perspective of the jihadists this Catholic-evangelical alliance opposes.

Eminent Catholic theologian George Weigel wrote that this article would get “a thumping ‘F’ as a freshman essay,” while Canadian priest and writer Raymond de Souza wrote that it “does not even rise to the level of mediocrity.”

Spadara and Figueroa confect from whole cloth a history of American Catholic and evangelical fundamentalists championing a theology not unlike Osama bin Laden’s — one that opposes dialogue and reconciliation, identifies enemies arbitrarily and promotes “apocalyptic war” with these elements, inside the U.S. and throughout the world. This misalliance of Catholic “integralists” and “evangelical fundamentalists” in the past opposed “black civil rights, the hippy movement, communism, feminism, and now Muslims and migrants.”

This is not only a bit rich, given some of the stances the Roman Church has taken within living memory, including a distaste for communism so ardent Pius XII had trouble unconditionally and publicly favoring the Allies over the Nazi-Fascist-Japanese Axis. It is also malicious and defamatory of the current president of the U.S., whom Pope Francis welcomed to the Vatican a couple of months ago (and blessed a rosary for Melania Trump, a co-religionist).

This extensive hallucinatory screed claims that the Catholic and evangelical factions are united in a “nostalgic dream of a theocratic type of state. However, the most dangerous prospect for this strange ecumenism is attributable to its xenophobic and Islamophobic vision that wants walls and purifying deportations.” Hence the “ecumenism of hate: Intolerance is a celestial mark of purism.”

It is very distressing that the Holy See could legitimize such drivel. It has descended beneath CNN, MSNBC, and the most scurrilous of the Never-Trumpers. (Not even the most rabid of them would claim that the president seeks to govern a theocracy.)

The U.S. government wishes to keep terrorists out of the United States and ensure that all immigration is documented — and not just a flood of unskilled aliens. To represent this as racism, xenophobia, jihadism, and tantamount to terrorism is an unimaginable disgrace from any publication known to have a semi-official status as an outlet for the pope.

The authors claim Church Militant is a “successful digital platform,” but its leader, Michael Voris, has been virtually expelled from the official American church and has only a very small following; the authors of this article seem to be the only people of any stature who are aware that Voris is likening Trump to the Emperor Constantine and Hillary Clinton to Diocletian. (Anyone who knows America at all would know that any such obscure and nonsensical claim is unlikely to find much fertile ground in any religious zone of the U.S. population.)

This is outright anti-Americanism, and the sort of ecclesiastical misrule that can lead to schism.

Dialogue has its limits and it is not the business of the church to take the place of politicians in sophisticated democracies, as the pope remarked in his reasonably inoffensive environmental encyclical "Laudato Si."

If it is not the purpose of the Catholic Church to make supreme determinations of right from wrong, this pope and his spokesmen should clarify what they think its role is. Jesus Christ did not tell St. Peter to found a speakers’ forum or a conciliation service  — especially not reconciliation with the anti-Christ.

Conrad Black, chairman of the London Daily Telegraph and many other newspapers for 15 years, is a financier, historian and biographer of Franklin D. Roosevelt and Richard Nixon. He comments widely and is a member of the British House of Lords

G’ day…Ciao…
Helen and Moe Lauzier

Thus articles

that is all articles This time, hopefully can provide benefits to you all. Okay, see you in another article post.

You are now reading the article the link address https://fairyforreference.blogspot.com/2017/08/httpift_16.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: