Title :
link :
Twitter Bans James Woods For Paraphrasing American Philosopher Ralph Waldo Emerson
WWW.MOEISSUESOFTHEDAY
.BLOGSPOT.COM
Tuesday, April 30, 2019
All Gave Some~Some Gave All
*****
NOTRE DAME ARCHITECT: BLAZE WAS NO ACCIDENT
French official cites expert after censorship by Fox News' Shepard Smith
ART MOOREFormer Notre Dame Cathedral architect Benjamin Mouton in a live broadcast April 16 on the French TV network LCI:
When the Fox News Channel’s Shepard Smith hung up on French politician and media analyst Philippe Karsenty during live coverage of the Notre Dame Cathedral blaze, authorities already were speculating the catastrophe that gripped the world was caused by an accident.
Smith wanted nothing to do with Karsenty providing context to the April 15 fire – nearly 2,000 attacks on French churches in two years – that would suggest an alternative cause should be considered.
And, in fact, as Karsenty pointed out in an phone interview from France with WND, a former chief architect of the Notre Dame – whose analysis has been virtually ignored – believes the accident theory makes no sense.
Karsenty told WND he was “shocked” when Smith abruptly ended the interview.
“I just wanted to put it in context,” he said, referring to the surge of attacks on churches. “And then I said, nevertheless, the media are lecturing us an hour after it started, saying it can only be unintentional.
“I didn’t say it was a terrorist attack. I didn’t say it was criminal,” Karsenty recalled to WND.
The French media analyst said he couldn’t have imagined such censorship “would happen in the United States.”
“I thought I was with the free-media outlet in the land of freedom. And
Although speculation is the coin of the cable-news realm, an indignant then I was cut off.”
Karsenty, 52, is the founder of the French media watchdog Media-Ratings and a councilor of the city of Neuilly-sur-Seine, a suburb of Paris.
Among the more recent of the nearly 2,000 attacks on churches in the old the Times he thought about that possibility but has ruled it out.
“For me, this would be impossible,” he said, pointing out that numerous past two years were a fire in Saint-Sulpice church in Paris, human feces smeared on a wall in Notre-Dame-des-Enfants in Nimes and the vandalization of the organ at Saint-Denis basilica outside the French capital.
Karsenty pointed out that while Paris public prosecutor Rémy Heitz has said from the beginning that he believes the fire was an accident, the former Notre Dame architect, Benjamin Mouton, insists that theory makes no sense.
In a live broadcast April 16 on the French TV network LCI, Mouton explained that the oak timbers that made up the cathedral’s roof had become hardened after more than 800 years and wouldn’t burn easily.
“You would need a lot of kindling to succeed,” said Mouton, who served as the chief architect from 2000 to 2013. “It stupefies me.”
Authorities suspect some type of electrical fire sparked the blaze, but Mouton believes that’s not possible.
“In the ’90s, we updated all the electrical wiring of Notre Dame. So there is no possibility of a short circuit,” he said. “We updated to conform with the contemporary norms, even going very far – all the detection and protection systems against fire in the cathedral.”
Last Thursday, investigators were allowed inside the cathedral for the first time, and a French police official told the New York Times nothing was being ruled out. They are focusing on the possibility of a short-circuit by electrified bells near the spire or cigarette butts left by workers carrying out renovation.
A bells specialist at the French Ministry of Culture, Regis Singer, said it’s plausible that the fire started in the bells in the spire.
But Nicolas Gueury, who electrified another set of bells in the cathedral in 2007, tredundant safeguards, including circuit breakers and shielding, were installed.
“It was draconian. We tripled the precautions,” he said.
“We were all hyper-prudent. You don’t do just anything in the forest,” he said, referring to the medieval timbers that supported the roof. “It was hyper-securitized.”
A contractor admitted last Wednesday that workers renovating the cathedral flouted a ban on smoking. But he insisted “in no way could a cigarette butt be the cause of the fire at Notre-Dame.”
‘Thank you for telling the truth’
Karsenty is known in France and around the world for charging that the iconic “martyrdom” of the 12-year-old Palestinian boy Muhammad al-Dura in 2000 was a hoax meant to bring condemnation on Israel. A defamation suit by France 2 television and its Middle East correspondent against Karsenty resulted in a decade-long legal battle in which the nation’s highest Court in 2012 overturned his conviction. A year later, the Paris Court of Appeals convicted him again. But that same year, an Israeli investigation, presenting video evidence, confirmed his claim that the Palestinians staged the boy’s death.
Nevertheless, to this day many on the left view Karsenty as a “conspiracy theorist,” and Shepard Smith’s treatment of him only solidified that view.
After the Fox News interview, Karsenty said, he was “slandered” on French TV and radio while some journalists told him privately they condemned Smith’s behavior.
At an elite club where he is a member along with prime ministers and members of parliament, he said people thanked him for speaking out.
“They said, ‘You were so right on TV. Thank you for telling the truth,” recounted Karsenty.
“People are fed up with the narrative they are telling us,” he said.
Karsenty said he was invited to come on a French TV program after his Fox News interview, but he requested that he be joined by Mouton, who would testify of his belief that the accident theory is unlikely, if not impossible.
Mouton declined, however, explaining he was in Shanghai, where he is a professor at Tongji University. And he hasn’t appeared on French television since the April 16 interview.
‘I thought I could go straight to the point’
Karsenty told WND he was not familiar with Shepard Smith and the news anchor’s reputation as a left-leaning counter to the network’s conservative commentators and hosts.
“To me, I was talking to Fox News. If I were on CNN or any other media outlet, I would have been more careful to bring the story,” he said.
“I thought I could go straight to the point of what was happening. I was shocked. It had never happened to me before anywhere in the world, to be cut off,” said Karsenty.
Smith interrupted his guest in the April 15 interview when after mentioning the church attacks, Karsenty said, “Of course you will hear the political correctness, that it’s probably an accident, but …
“Sir, sir, sir, we’re not going to speculate here of the cause of something that we don’t know,” Smith interjected. “If you have observations or you know something, we would love to hear it.”
Karsenty continued: “I’m just telling you you need to be ready …”
“No, sir. We’re not doing that here,” Smith declared. “Not now. Not on my watch! Philippe Karsenty, it’s very good of you to be here.”
See the Fox News interview:
Challenging the conventional narrative
Karsenty observed a pattern in such incidents – particularly if it might have something to do with Islam – of authorities, without having investigated, immediately telling the public it was an accident.
“If you come out and say, ‘Wait a minute, there may be another explanation,’ it’s not [allowed],” he said.
“You don’t have the right to think freely.”
The al-Dura affair echoes the Fox News interview, Karsenty acknowledged, in its challenge to a narrative staunchly held by information gatekeepers.
The images aired by France 2 of the father and son purportedly under fire from Israeli soldiers became a rallying cry for the 2000 Intifada against Israel. Postage stamps in the Middle East bore the images. And images of the boy could be seen in the background when Jewish-American journalist Daniel Pearl was beheaded by al-Qaida jihadists in 2002.
Karsenty said that even after video evidence was presented showing the incident was a hoax, French courts argued that he didn’t possess that evidence at the time he made the claim in the 2004 article that provoked the case.
It seems, he said, that he was found guilty of being “too intuitive.”
In a September 2013 interview with New English Review, Karsenty said France 2 television, French officials and the French Association of Journalists didn’t care about the facts.
“They have a faith. Their faith is that the state of Israel is guilty of killing children. They also have a political objective which is to make the state of Israel guilty,” he said.
“Anytime I’m in front of someone who has a decent brain and who is open-minded, when I show him the pieces of evidence he agrees and says of course it’s a hoax.”
Read more at https://www.wnd.com/2019/04/notre-dame-architect-blaze-was-no-accident/#XbCWxY3sJzoJphoh.99
‘Very Fine People on Both Sides’
Robert E. Lee Statue in Charlottesville (Katherine Welles/Shutterstock)
Willoughby Run is a stream too small to be called a creek. Trickling southward through the hills of Adams County, Pennsylvania, it runs between two low ridges and crosses U.S. Highway 30 east of what is now a golf course, but which on the morning of July 1, 1863, was farmland. On the ridge west of Willoughby Run was a tavern owned by Frederick Herr and on that ridge, two brigades of Confederate infantry assembled, having marched some seven miles from Cashtown that morning. These brigades belonged to a division commanded by Maj. Gen. Harry Heth, part of the III Corps of the Army of Northern Virginia, the vanguard of Robert E Lee’s force invading Pennsylvania. They marched that July morning toward a memorable clash near a crossroads town less than a mile east of Willoughby Run, a place called Gettysburg.
Heth and his men had little trouble brushing back the Yankee cavalry that had sought to obstruct their march toward Gettysburg where, it is said, Heth believed he might capture a supply of shoes for his ragged troops. As the Confederate brigades lined up on Herr Ridge west of Willoughby Run, the blue-coated cavalrymen pulled back to the ridge on the east side of the stream, on the farm of a man named McPherson. The Union cavalry, commanded by Brig. Gen. John Buford, kept up a desultory fire with their carbines, with little effect on the Confederate infantry at a distance of nearly a quarter-mile, concealed by trees on Herr Ridge. Buford’s troopers were supported by a six-gun battery of artillery, and Heth brought up his own artillery to return fire, as he reconnoitered the position. The Southerners believed the main Union army was still far from Gettysburg, and that they faced no more than cavalry, perhaps supported by some local Pennsylvania militia. Heth gave the order for an advance, with the two brigades deployed on either side of the road leading east. On the north side of the road was a brigade of Mississippi troops commanded by Brig. Gen. Joseph Davis, nephew of Confederate President Jefferson Davis. South of the road was a brigade of troops from Tennessee and Alabama, commanded by Brig. Gen. James J. Archer, a Maryland native and an alumnus of Princeton University.
Archer’s brigade was one of the best in the Confederate army, having led the charge that broke the Yankee line at the Battle of Chancellorsville. One of Archer’s regiments, the 13th Alabama, was led by Col. Birkett Davenport Fry, a West Point dropout whose career had included volunteer service in the Mexican War and the notorious “filibuster” expedition to Nicaragua. And in the ranks of the 13th Alabama that July morning were two young privates from Randolph County, Winston Wood Bolt and his brother Robert, whose fate is of more than passing interest to me. When Heth ordered the advance from Herr Ridge, Archer’s brigade marched down to Willoughby Run and waded across the shallow stream then up the hillside beyond. The 13th Alabama was near the right flank of the brigade, and their attention was focused toward the woods on their left near the road, where Union troops were putting up a spirited resistance. Someone on the Confederate line noticed that these Yankees were wearing a distinctive style of hat they’d seen in previous battles and called out: “Ain’t no militia. It’s them black-hat fellows again. It’s the Army of the Potomac.”
Indeed, those “black-hat fellows” were Western troops commanded by Brig. Gen. Solomon Meredith, destined to be famous as the Union army’s “Iron Brigade,” and their appearance on the field proved to be a turning point in the Battle of Gettysburg. The Iron Brigade had rushed cross-country to the sound of the guns near Willoughby Run, and they arrived on the field in a somewhat disorderly way. By the time their lead regiment was fighting Archer’s men in the woods near the road, the trailing regiments were just coming over McPherson Ridge further south. This proved decisive in that opening clash at Gettysburg, as the Iron Brigade’s 24th Michigan regiment, the last to arrive on the field, came in at an angle that completely overlapped the right flank of Archer’s brigade. As one Tennessee survivor recalled, the Confederates were suddenly confronted with the choice either to run for the rear or surrender. Archer was among those captured, along with about 75 of his troops, including Pvt. Winston Bolt, my great-grandfather.
My direct personal connection to what Southerners sometimes used to call “The Late Unpleasantness” necessarily informs my opinions of more recent events, including Joe Biden’s insulting and dishonest attack on President Trump. In announcing his candidacy for the Democratic Party’s 2020 presidential nomination, Biden falsely accused Trump of sympathizing with neo-Nazi extremists who helped turn an August 2017 rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, into the site of senseless and deadly violence. Propaganda claims surrounding that episode have obscured the facts behind the wild mob scene in which Heather Heyer, 32, was killed when 20-year-old white supremacist James Fields rammed his car into a crowd of left-wing protesters.
A local politician in Charlottesville named Wes Bellamy had proposed removing a statue of General Lee from a park in the city, and this sparked a series of protests in opposition to Bellamy’s plan. A local activist named Jason Kessler issued the call for the so-called “Unite the Right” rally and, in the climate of political division following Trump’s 2016 defeat of Hillary Clinton, this rally attracted violence-prone extremists both Left and Right. The night before the rally saw a creepy torchlight march of neo-Nazis through Charlottesville, and on the day of the rally, a massive crowd of left-wing counter-protesters showed up, including dozens of masked “Antifa” thugs looking for a fight. Many have blamed Virginia’s Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe for the failure of law enforcement to prevent the violence that predictably erupted that day, but nothing that happened at Charlottesville could fairly be blamed on President Trump.
In last week’s video announcing his third bid for the presidency, however, Biden repeated a smear that left-wing activists have promoted, when he claimed Trump “shocked the conscience of this nation” with his response to the Charlottesville violence. “He said there were, quote, ‘some very fine people on both sides.’ Very fine people?” Biden asked in the video. “With those words, the President of the United States assigned a moral equivalence between those spreading hate and those with the courage to stand against it.”
This is simply false. Trump’s comment about “very fine people on both sides” referred to the controversy over Lee’s statue, and not to anyone “spreading hate.” On the same day the rally happened, Trump made a public statement lamenting “the terrible events unfolding in Charlottesville, Virginia,” and condemning “in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence.” He continued: “It has no place in America. What is vital now is a swift restoration of law and order and the protection of innocent lives. No citizen should ever fear for their safety and security in our society.… I just got off the phone with the governor of Virginia, Terry McAuliffe, and we agree that the hate and the division must stop, and must stop right now.” Three days later, when Trump took questions at the White House, reporters repeatedly asked him for further comment. You can read the entire transcript of that press conference, and see that the president specified he was speaking of the Lee statue when he said there were “very fine people on both sides” of the dispute. Furthermore, Trump asked, if memorials to Lee and other Confederates were now subject to destruction, “I wonder, is it George Washington next week? And is it Thomas Jefferson the week after?”
Indeed, such controversies are not moot speculation: Radical students at Hofstra University insist that a statue of Jefferson be removed from their campus, and at George Washington University, campus activists assert that the “Colonials” nickname of the school’s sports teams is “extremely offensive” and “glorifies the act of systemic oppression.” What is apparent from such claims is, first of all, that America’s schools have failed to properly teach history, and second, that we are living in an era of frightening radicalism, in which ignorance and rage walk hand-in-hand. As tragedies like Charlottesville demonstrate, political polarization is dangerous. And as Joe Biden’s remarks demonstrate, there are unscrupulous politicians who seek selfish advantage from this polarization.
We have seen this before. How was it that my great-grandfather, a simple Alabama farm boy, ended up on that hillside in Pennsylvania, captured by farm boys from Michigan? Years of escalating crisis, fomented by radicals and exploited by politicians, led finally to the division of America and the deadliest war in our nation’s history. More than 600,000 soldiers died in that four-year war, and when I ponder the fate of my ancestor Winston Wood Bolt, I recognize what a miracle it was that he was not among the dead. Had he not been captured on the first day at Gettysburg, he may well have been killed on the third day, when his brigade took part in the final assault known to history as Pickett’s Charge. His regimental colonel was grievously wounded in that charge; Winston Bolt’s brother Robert, who survived Gettysburg without being captured or killed, lost an arm the next spring in the Battle of the Wilderness. Meanwhile, my great-grandfather spent two years as a prisoner of war at Fort Delaware before being paroled when the war ended.
Private Bolt signed his parole with an “X.” He was completely illiterate, you see, and it is therefore impossible for me to know what my ancestor’s opinions were on the controversies that led to the Civil War. However, I can form an estimate of his character from knowing his daughter Perlonia, my grandmother, a stern but kindly Christian woman who lived to be 94 years old. It should not be necessary to explain why I bristle at any insult to my grandmother’s family, to hear them smeared as “racists” by people who never knew them. Some people like to display their imagined superiority by impugning my Southern ancestors in this manner, and I’ve learned to restrain my temper about such insults. Had such men as Alabama’s William Lowndes Yancey been better able to restrain their tempers, there might never have been a Civil War, but we must live with the consequences of history as it actually happened, rather than in whatever fictional alternative anyone might fondly imagine. Wishing that slavery or secession never happened is as futile as wishing that J.E.B. Stuart’s cavalry had been present to protect the advance of Lee’s army toward Gettysburg on that fateful July morning in 1863.
Joe Biden seems to imagine that he can rewrite his own history, and that the rest of us are too stupid to notice. As has been pointed out, Biden was still opposing school desegregation efforts in Delaware more than a decade after passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and, in 1975, he was among the senators who voted unanimously to restore Robert E. Lee’s citizenship. Biden’s positions in the 1970s were, arguably, defensible given the political realities of that era. The kind of school busing programs Biden opposed had led to violent riots in Boston and other communities, and he might defend his stance as an effort to avoid such conflicts. Similarly, the Civil War was once understood as resulting from a tragic failure of the democratic process, and the restoration of Lee’s citizenship was a gesture of national unity by statesmen seeking to heal the ancient rift between North and South. It is absurd to imagine that the Biden of 2019 might use a time machine to travel back four decades and advise a younger Biden to adopt a radical posture to serve his future presidential ambitions, because a radical Biden never could have been elected to the Senate in 1972 nor re-elected in 1978. Speaking of elected leaders, what about Jefferson Davis? In 1978, a congressional resolution restoring the Confederate president’s citizenship was signed into law by President Jimmy Carter. And it is also necessary to mention, in this context, that the official celebration of Robert E. Lee’s birthday in Arkansas was signed into law in 1985 by Gov. Bill Clinton.
History cannot be changed according to our wishes, and there is no reason to believe that politicians of the 21st century are morally superior to the politicians of the past, whose faults and failures now seem so easily apparent. Shall we condemn Joe Biden, Bill Clinton or Jimmy Carter as racists for their pro-Confederate past? Or should we instead suspect that Democrats like Biden are now simply seeking political advantage by smearing Trump and other Republicans as racists?
A few months after my great-grandfather was captured at Gettysburg, a Republican politician showed up there to give a speech — perhaps you’ve heard of it — about the importance of preserving “government of the people, by the people, for the people.” In 2016, the people of Adams County, Pennsylvania, voted by more than a 2-to-1 margin to elect Donald Trump president and, much like the election of 1860, many Democrats seem unwilling to recognize this result as legitimate. Hillary Clinton condemned as “deplorables” the nearly 63 million Americans who voted for Trump, and now Joe Biden would seem to be praising the “courage” of violent Antifa thugs who played a significant role in the Charlottesville riot. If there were “very fine people on both sides” that day in August 2017, there were also some dangerously violent people on both sides. Trump did not hesitate to condemn violence by neo-Nazi extremists, but have you seen any reporters asking Biden to condemn the violence of the radical Left? Or would it be “spreading hate” to ask tough questions of a Democrat?
Why are Americans still arguing about a war that ended more than 150 years ago? Shouldn’t we have learned the lessons of history and forgiven our grudges by now? Because my own ancestor was illiterate, I have no direct guidance from him in this matter, but there was another Confederate survivor of Gettysburg who wrote a letter with some useful advice: “My experience of men has neither disposed me to think worse of them nor indisposed me to serve them; nor in spite in spite of failures which I lament, of errors which I now see and acknowledge, or of the present aspect of affairs, do I despair of the future. The truth is this: The march of Providence is so slow and our desires so impatient; the work of progress so immense and our means of aiding it so feeble; the life of humanity is so long, that of the individual so brief, that we often see only the ebb of the advancing wave and are thus discouraged. It is history that teaches us to hope.”
So said Robert E. Lee in 1870 and we ought to heed his advice.
Ouch! Trump Destroys Judge Napolitano: Ever Since I Said NO to Supreme Court Request He Has Been Very Hostile!
Ouch! Trump Destroys Judge Napolitano: Ever Since I Said NO to Supreme Court Request He Has Been Very Hostile!
by Jim Hoft For months FOX News contributor and Judge Andrew Napolitano has hounded Trump on the conservative leaning network.
And earlier this week Judge Napolitano suggest that President Trump obstructed justice in the Mueller probe.
On Saturday President Trump hit back twice as hard
Trump accused the FOX News legal expert of bitter fruit after he was turned down for a Supreme Court slot.
President Trump: Thank you to brilliant and highly respected attorney Alan Dershowitz for destroying the very dumb legal argument of “Judge” Andrew Napolitano. Ever since Andrew came to my office to ask that I appoint him to the U.S. Supreme Court, and I said NO, he has been very hostile! Also asked for pardon for his friend. A good “pal” of low ratings Shepard Smith.
Democrats Say Trump Not Allowed To Discuss Ralph Northam’s Infanticide Advocacy
Democrats Say Trump Not Allowed To Discuss Ralph Northam’s Infanticide Advocacy
Last night President Trump presided over a huge rally in Green Bay, Wisconsin – the state that Hillary can’t find. His speech was quite something and hit on all the major themes. However, today social media has been having a tantrum because he dared to talk about infanticide and abortion. Something that he is evidently NOT allowed to do.
Here’s what he said at last night’s rally:
“”[Democrats] are aggressively pushing extreme late-term abortion, allowing children to be ripped from their mother’s womb right up until the moment of birth. And just this week your Democrat governor, and by the way we have Scott Walker here. He’s a great governor, he did a great job, he’s a great governor. He’s got kind of big future, but your Democrat governor here in Wisconsin shockingly stated that he will veto legislation that protects Wisconsin babies born alive.””
He’s right. Democrat governors and legislatures all over the country are advocating for infanticide and late term abortion. Maine, Vermont, and New York legislature cheering their sickening and heinous bill are just a few of the states where this kind of atrocity is being pushed into the mainstream.
However, where the leftists are really melting down is with the second part of his statement.
“”The baby is born, the mother meets with the doctor, they take care of the baby, they wrap the baby beautifully, and then the doctor and the mother determine whether or not they will execute the baby. I don’t think so. Incredible, no, It’s incredible. Until this crazy man in Virginia said it, nobody even thought of that right? They didn’t, wouldn’t even think of that. Yeah late term, but this is where the baby is actually born and came out. It’s there, it’s wrapped and that’s it so to protect us in life I called in Congress to immediately pass legislation prohibiting the extreme late-term abortion.”” [Emphasis in original]
One would’ve thought that Trump had just killed the world from all the reactions. The underlying theme of the day from the leftist tantrums is that Trump made a false claim!
One would’ve thought that Trump had just killed the world from all the reactions. The underlying theme of the day from the leftist tantrums is that Trump made a false claim!
Aaron Rupar ✔ @atruparTrump on his plan to relocate undocumented immigrants to sanctuary cities: "That was actually my sick idea."
Trump falsely claims Democrats support murdering babies.
"The baby is born, the mother meets w/the doctor. They take care of the baby. They wrap the baby beautifully. Then the doctor and mother determine whether or not they will execute the baby."
The crowd respond w/angry boos pic.twitter.com/DgVgw5IZ0f
Ilhan Omar ✔ @IlhanMNThis is truly dangerous and sickening.
Is this deranged President suggesting parents and doctors are working together to commit infanticide?
We have seen religious fanatics bombing clinics and threatening women, this will fan the flame of violence.
Stop the misinformation.
Amee Vanderpool @girlsreallyrule
"The baby is born, the mother meets w/the doctor. They take care of the baby. They wrap the baby beautifully. Then the doctor and mother determine whether or not they will execute the baby."
How is this man's mental state not a National Emergency right now?
"The baby is born, the mother meets w/the doctor. They take care of the baby. They wrap the baby beautifully. Then the doctor and mother determine whether or not they will execute the baby."
How is this man's mental state not a National Emergency right now?
Yes, I know. That was a tweet from Ilhan Omar. The point is, the talking points have been sent out. Trump bad! Abortion good! Trump mean! Abortion is peachy keen!
Trump was indirectly quoting Ralph Northam’s EXACT words. Starts at about 1:20 in:
In case you didn’t quite hear, this is what Northam said:
“So in this particular example, if a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered, the infant would be kept comfortable, the infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother. So I think this was really blown out of proportion.’ (emphasis added)”
To be blunt, Northam and the evil bill proposed by VA legislator Kathy Tran not only advocated for 3rd trimester abortion, it threw the door wide open for infanticide.
You see, if the mother and family (if there is family around) don’t want the baby to be resuscitated, then what’s next? Given the legislation Northam was discussing, the baby’s death was the only other option. That’s evil. Period.
But you see, the party of the Left wants us to forget about Northam. They want us to forget that he, as a physician, is absolutely fine with doing harm to babies if it involves abortion. They want us to forget about Northam and his ‘Wreck-It Ralph’ blackface debacle. He’s a Democrat you see, so he gets a pass.
Yet President Trump is not allowed to bring up the evil donkey in the room. Why? Because he is Trump and because Republicans don’t like women.
Trump accurately described what Northam said. He’s even pushed for protection of babies born alive legislation that the Democrats swiftly dumped into the trash.
Trump was right to point a finger at Ralph Northam. Trump was right to make the case for life for both the born and unborn. Trump has chosen life for all. The Democrats have chosen death as evidenced by their reaction today.
G’day…Ciao…
Helen and Moe Lauzier
Thus articles
that is all articles
This time, hopefully can provide benefits to you all. Okay, see you in another article post.
You are now reading the article the link address https://fairyforreference.blogspot.com/2019/04/twitter-bans-james-woods-for.html
0 Response to " "
Post a Comment