FAIRY FOR CHILDREN

- Hallo friend FAIRY FOR CHILDREN, In the article you read this time with the title , we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article adventure, Article animation, Article fantasy, Article The latest, Article wit, we write can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title :
link :

WWW.MOEISSUESOFTHEDAY.BLOGSPOT.COM
Sat.Jan. 12, 2019
All Gave Some~Some Gave All
*****

‘You don’t have a clue’: Feinstein gets taken to gun school 101 for her proposed ‘assault weapons’ ban

Vivek Saxena

(Video screenshots)

Despite years of gun experts trying to explain to her that the term is flawed, Democrat Sen. Dianne Feinstein continues nevertheless to misuse the term “assault weapons” in her relentless bid to regulate the Second Amendment into near non-existence.

Case in point: On Wednesday she and her Democrat peers in the Senate introduced an “Assault Weapons Ban of 2019” bill that would “ban the sale, transfer, manufacture and importation of military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.”

Sen Dianne Feinstein ✔@SenFeinstein
Replying to @SenFeinstein

Americans across the nation are asking Congress to reinstate the federal ban on military-style assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. If we’re going to put a stop to mass shootings and protect our children, we need to get these weapons of war off our streets.

1,001

Sen Dianne Feinstein ✔@SenFeinstein
Replying to @SenFeinstein

That’s why I’m proud to introduce the Assault Weapons Ban of 2019. This bill bans the sale, manufacture, transfer and importation of 205 military-style assault weapons by name.

2,726

Sen Dianne Feinstein ✔@SenFeinstein
Replying to @SenFeinstein

It also bans any assault weapon that accepts a detachable magazine and has one or more military characteristics including a pistol grip, a forward grip, a barrel shroud, a threaded barrel or a folding or telescoping stock.

1,668

Sen Dianne Feinstein ✔@SenFeinstein
And it bans magazines and other ammunition feeding devices that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition, which allow shooters to quickly fire many rounds without needing to reload. Information on all of the bill’s provisions can be found here: http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=press-releases&id=EFC76859-879D-4038-97DD-C577212ED17B …

2,543

Except there’s no such thing as “military-style assault weapons.” There are however certain “cosmetic features” that grossly misinformed Democrats like Sen. Feinstein think have the power to magically transform an otherwise regular weapon into a military-styled one.

In the case of her new bill, these cosmetic traits include, as an example, “a pistol grip, a forward grip, a barrel shroud, a threaded barrel or a folding or telescoping stock.”

But as noted by actual gun experts such as National Rifle Association spokeswoman Dana Loesch, these are all cosmetic features that have no effect whatsoever on a weapon’s capabilities.

Nancy Pelosi Whines That a Border Wall Discriminates Against People Entering Illegally

Katie Pavlich @KatiePavlich

Source: AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Speaking to reporters on Capitol Hill Thursday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi complained that President Trump's border barrier proposal "discriminates" against those entering the country illegally.

"Quite frankly when the president talks about this being a national security issue, it really isn't. It's about a policy that is discriminatory about where people are coming into this country," she said.

She of course made this statement right after claiming Democrats really care about border security.

"We all support border security. We take an oath to protect and defend the American people," Pelosi said. "There's a better way. A more effective way to secure our borders and that is what the debate should be about."

As a reminder, Pelosi cares so much about border security that she's openly defended MS-13 gang members.

Meanwhile, when asked about whether she'd be willing to strike a deal over President Trump's $5.7 billion barrier request in exchange for DACA, she said the issue hasn't been discussed.

President Trump is in McAllen, Texas today hearing from Border Patrol agents on the ground. He met with Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer at the White House yesterday. President Trump offered to open the government in exchange for border barrier support. Pelosi said no.

Chuck Schumer wants this BANNED from the internet

by Frank Holmes, reporter

Donald Trump has said the United States needs a wall on the southern border to keep out terrorists bent on committing unthinkable crimes against Americans.

The Democrats and the media say there’s nothing to worry about — that it’s all a “manufactured crisis.”

But undeniable evidence proves that radical Islamic terrorists have been crossing into the U.S. through the Southwest for years — and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer does NOT want American voters to know about it.

A little-publicized article ripped the lid off just one terrorist pathway from the Middle East into the U.S.

Terrorists from Iran, Pakistan, Iraq and other state sponsors of terror fly into South America and cross into Panama and Costa Rica on their way to the Rio Grande… and our allies know all about it!

Todd Bensman of the Center for Immigration Studies went to Panama and Costa Rica to report on this terrorist pipeline firsthand for The Federalist. He revealed shocking details about the life-threatening plot.

As many as 700 illegal immigrants a week cross into Panama, where the government lets them rest before helping them move closer to the United States.

The governments call the program “Controlled Flow” — because the illegals and terrorists just keep flowing toward the U.S.!

Once they reach Costa Rica, they rest in Golfito camp for a few days.

But officials in both countries tip off the U.S. if there are terrorists in the pack — like when they arrested Ibrahim Qoordheen, a Somalian suspected to be a terrorist affiliated with Al-Shabaab, an Al-Qaeda affiliate.

But sometimes the terrorists slip through the cracks — like “upwards of 100 people” who were smuggled from the Middle East to the U.S. by Sharafat Ali Khan.

Illegals from Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Bangladesh paid Khan up to $15,000 apiece for him to get them into the U.S. Some of them hoped to wage jihad against innocent Americans on U.S. soil.

“Several of the individuals smuggled by Khan’s organization had suspected ties to terrorist organizations,” according to ICE, which deported Khan to Pakistan last December.

Officials said one of the Afghanis had family members in the Taliban, and that he planned to commit terrorist acts after he crossed the U.S. border with Mexico.

Khan may be the most successful terrorist-smuggler busted by immigration authorities, but there are so many others.

The same month that ICE — the organization Congressional Democrats want to abolish — sent Khan packing, the international police organization INTERPOL also arrested illegals with ties to terrorism who were trying to enter the U.S. through Mexico.

This has been going on for years… while previous administrations did absolutely nothing about it.

Back in September 2014, Texas officials arrested four Turks who were affiliated with a terrorist organization after they crossed the border.

“This incident proves what enforcement experts have always known, and that is there are existing networks in Mexico and Central America that have been set up and cultivated by a variety of terrorist organizations to enable them to move people into the United States illegally,” said Jessica Vaughan of CIS at the time.

Donald Trump is right; there’s just no denying it (unless you’re the Fake News media).

NBC News tried to downplay the fact that federal agents nabbed “just 6 immigrants on US-Mexico border in first half of fiscal year 2018 whose names were on a federal government list of known or suspected terrorists.”

NBC News ✔@NBCNews

NEW: US Customs and Border Protection encountered just 6 immigrants on US-Mexico border in first half of fiscal year 2018 whose names were on a federal government list of known or suspected terrorists, according to CBP data obtained by @NBCNews. https://nbcnews.to/2Fft3Mh

5,939

How many would be acceptable, then?

The networks may try to cover for the Democrats but people have already suffered because of our wide-open borders.

Abdulahi Hasan Sharif allegedly stabbed a police officer before he ran over four peoplewith a U-Haul in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, on September 30, 2017.

Sharif, who was affiliated with Al-Shabaab, had an ISIS flag in his car.

And guess how he got to Canada? He took the same route from his native Somalia to Brazil, and then through the U.S. border with Mexico. He just decided to move on to Canada, where he is charged with five counts of attempted murder.

How can Democrats sleep at night knowing that their open borders policies left blood on the streets of Edmonton — and blood on their hands?

“I believe what is happening right now at the border is that the Democrats are putting the lives of others who are coming to our country—trying to come in illegally—ahead of the rights of Americans who are here,” Rep. Doug Collins, GA-R, told PBS on Wednesday. “I believe the president is putting Americans first. I believe he is putting our citizenry first.”

Build the wall!

— Frank Holmes is a reporter for The Horn News. He is a veteran journalist and an outspoken conservative that talks about the news that was in his weekly article, “On The Holmes Front.”

THINGS DEMOCRATS HAVE FUNDED THAT COST MORE THAN THE 1/10TH OF 1 PERCENT OF BUDGET NEEDED FOR BORDER SECURITY WALL

THINGS DEMOCRATS HAVE FUNDED THAT COST MORE THAN THE BORDER WALL

Lawmakers have put less thought into other, more expensive projects over the years

By Tom Elliott

 

After President Trump requested $5.7 billion to fund the border wall he campaigned on in 2016, Democrats have dug in, refusing to appropriate the funds that the administration says are needed to better manage the flow of immigration across the southern border.

Democrats are not traditionally known for their fiscal rectitude but are being particularly parsimonious over what ultimately amounts to a very small percentage of the federal budget. (In 2018, the feds spent $4.173 trillion overall, meaning the border wall would amount to just 1/10th of 1 percent of current annual federal spending.)

Indeed, these lawmakers have happily funded various projects over the years that cost far more than the border wall — many of which had very questionable value. Below are some examples of wasteful federal spending projects that individually cost more than the proposed border wall (some data courtesy of Citizens Against Government Waste):

• “Rural Utility Service.” This program costs taxpayers $8.2 billion/year and has no actual purpose after its original intent — bringing electricity to rural communities — was long ago achieved. It’s now being used to bring broadband access to small communities (usually with populations of less than 20,000). However there’s no indication the “beneficiaries” of this expensive government agency actually appreciate the program and the majority of its projects are not completed on time or within budget.
• Sugar Subsidies. America, as Democrats frequently intone, faces a health crisis. What they don’t tell us is that it’s largely of their own making, as Congress subsidizes the production of unhealthy foods like sugar and high-fructose corn syrup. Eliminating sugar subsidies alone would save $6 billion, enough to fund the border wall; it would also have the added benefit of helping curb the nation’s obesity epidemic.
• Community Development Grants. These grants were created in the 70s to revitalize failing American cities. The program has almost always been plagued with dysfunction, with grants going to wealthy communities and other recipients failing to produce accountability or results. Citizens Against Government Waste reports that even President Obama called for reining in the program. It’s elimination would save $15 billion over 5 years.
• The United Nations. As the United Nation’s largest contributor, the U.S. in 2016 donated $10 billion to the U.N. As CAGW notes, reducing these contributions just 25 percent would create a savings of $12.5 billion over 10 years. Of the money Congress appropriates for the United Nations, 5 million taxpayer dollars are itemized for abortions in foreign countries.
• Amtrak. Congress could sell Amtrak to the private sector where it would almost certainly be operated more efficiently, but instead it’s showered in billions of dollars of taxpayer subsidies. Over the next five years, these subsidies will cost $9.7 billion.
• Unused Real Estate. Congress appropriates money to maintain federal real estate that’s not actually being used. Per CAGW, an October 31, 2017, CRS report found that, “In FY2016, federal agencies owned 3,120 buildings that were vacant (unutilized), and another 7,859 that were partially empty (underutilized).” Current laws require the government to undergo a series of steps before considering a sale of these buildings. Were selling this unused property prioritized, the 5-year savings are estimated at $15 billion. Simply maintaining the unused buildings annually costs $1.7 billion.
• Foreign Aid. American taxpayers currently spend more than $50 billion a year helping develop foreign countries. Many of the recipients are not known for being America’s closest allies — such as Egypt, South Sudan, Uganda, South Africa, Russia, the Congo, Sudan, and Zambia — which raises the question of what Americans are receiving in exchange for all of this aid. Cutting these donations back just 10 percent would be enough to fund the wall.  
• Waste, Fraud, and Abuse. The Government Accountability Office estimates taxpayers are spending more than $137 billion annually on “payment errors,” which covers all manner of waste, fraud, and abuse within Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. The feds could implement the same kind of fraud protections credit card companies used to ensure against abuse, but don’t. In fact, Congress has gone in the opposite direction, winding down the program intended to police fraud within Medicare, the so-called Recovery Audit Contractor. In other words, Congress is knowingly funding tens of billions of dollars of fraud annually.
  

Despite many of of the above projects having arguably negative value, Congress continues to fund them. Eliminating any one of the above would create more than enough savings to fund the White House’s border wall appropriation request.

Of course, other smaller federal spending projects are even more wasteful. Examples abound, but here are a few that are at least amusing:

• The feds spent $613,634 to boost “intimacy and trust” of transgender women and their male partners (The Washington Free Beason)
• The feds spent $5 million paying hipsters to stop smoking and then blog about it (as well as use cool anti-smoking swag — like beer koozies). (Readers Digest)
• Northwestern University has received more than $3 million in National Institutes of Health to watch hamster fights. “Some of those experiments involved injecting hamsters with steroids, then putting another hamster in the cage to see if the drugged rodents were more aggressive when protecting their territory. This program has since been halted following protests from animal rights activists,” Readers Digest reports.  
• The feds spend $1,009,762 training “social justice” math teachers (The Washington Free Beacon)
• “The government spent at least $518,000 in federal grants to study how cocaine affects the sexual behavior of Japanese quails,” Readers Digest reports.
• The Federal Register is legally required to be printed daily and distributed to Congressional offices despite most never being read and all of the information being available online. Stopping this unnecessary printing would save $1 million a year.
  

What did we miss? What programs do you think are most wasteful? Let us know in the comments below.

G'day…Ciao…
Helen and Moe Lauzier

Thus articles

that is all articles This time, hopefully can provide benefits to you all. Okay, see you in another article post.

You are now reading the article the link address https://fairyforreference.blogspot.com/2019/01/www_11.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: