FAIRY FOR CHILDREN

- Hallo friend FAIRY FOR CHILDREN, In the article you read this time with the title , we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article adventure, Article animation, Article fantasy, Article The latest, Article wit, we write can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title :
link :

WWW.MOEISSUESOFTHEDAY.
BLOGSPOT.COM
Thursday, Mar. 22, 2018
All Gave Some~Some Gave All
*****

Austin Suspect Bombs Self - Suicide as Cops Closed In Police Chief: ‘Remain Vigilant’

 

Interesting Gun Perspective
The flurry of useless gun control proposals is perfectly described by one of my favorite sayings re stupid decisions…Pick up the ball and run…it’s the speed and not the direction that counts.

Interesting statistics…

There are 30,000 gun related deaths per year by firearms, and this number is not disputed. The U.S. population is 324,059,091 as of June 22, 2016. Do the math: 0.00925% of the population dies from gun-related actions each year. What is never told, however, is the breakdown of those 30,000 deaths and to put them in perspective as compared to other causes of death:

• 65% of those deaths are by suicide, which would never be prevented by gun laws.
• 15% are by law enforcement in the line of duty and justified.
• 17% are through criminal activity, gang and drug related or mentally ill persons.
• 3% are accidental discharge deaths.
• So, technically, "gun violence" is not 30,000 annually, but drops to around 5,100. Now lets look at how those deaths spanned across the nation.
• • 480 homicides (9.4%) were in Chicago
  • 344 homicides (6.7%) were in Baltimore
  • 333 homicides (6.5%) were in Detroit
  • 119 homicides (2.3%) were in Washington D.C. (a 54% increase over prior years)

Basically, 25% of all gun crime happens in just 4 cities. All 4 of those cities have extremely strict gun laws, so it is not the lack of law that is the root cause.

This basically leaves 3,825 for the entire rest of the nation, or about 75 deaths per state. That is an average because some States have much higher rates than others. For example, California had 1,169 and Alabama had 1.

Now, who has the strictest gun laws by far? California, of course, but understand, it is not guns causing this. It is a crime rate spawned by the number of criminal persons residing in those cities and states. So if all cities and states are not created equal, then there must be something other than the tool causing the gun deaths.

Are 5,100 deaths per year horrific? Of course. How about in comparison to other deaths? All death is sad and especially so when it is in the commission of a crime, but that is the nature of crime. Robbery, death, rape, assault are all done by criminals.

It is ludicrous to think that criminals will obey laws. That is why they are called criminals.

But what about other deaths each year? (These increase each year so are likely higher than these numbers)

• 40,000+ die from a drug overdose–THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THAT!
• 36,000 people die per year from the flu, far exceeding the criminal gun deaths.
• 34,000 people die per year in traffic fatalities( exceeding gun deaths even if you include suicide).
• Now it gets good:
• 250,000+ people die each year (and growing) from preventable medical errors. You are safer walking in the worst areas of Chicago than you are when you are in a hospital!
• 710,000 people die per year from heart disease. It’s time to stop the double cheeseburgers! So what is the point? If the liberal loons and the anti-gun movement focused their attention on heart disease, even a 10% decrease in cardiac deaths would save twice the number of lives annually of all gun-related deaths (including suicide, law enforcement, etc.). A 10% reduction in medical errors would be 66% of the total number of gun deaths or 4 times the number of criminal homicides.
• Simple, easily preventable 10% reductions! So you have to ask yourself, in the grand scheme of things, why the focus on guns? It's pretty simple:

Taking away guns gives control to governments. The founders of this nation knew that regardless of the form of government, those in power may become corrupt (‘Sanctuary cities/states' such as California) and seek to rule as the British did by trying to disarm the populace of the colonies. It is not difficult to understand that a disarmed populace is a controlled populace.

Thus, the second amendment was proudly and boldly included in the U.S. Constitution. It must be preserved at all costs. So the next time someone tries to tell you that gun control is about saving lives, look at these facts and remember these words from Noah Webster…

"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed.”

Wake up, America!

Tom Brady’s career will end sooner than expected: director

By Jaclyn Hendricks

Modal Trigger

Getty Images

The 40-year-old quarterback, who recently appeared in the Facebook docu-series “Tom v. Time,” has expressed his desire to play well into his 40s. But director Gotham Chopra, who spent the past year alongside Brady, foresees a shorter run.

“This idea that he’s going to play for four or five more seasons … I mean, this is just me, the guy who’s been around him for a while now. I just have a hard time envisioning that, to be candid,” Chopra recently said on “The MMQB Podcast with Peter King.” “But we’ll see. I do think that these next few weeks and months are a critical time for him.”

After falling short of a sixth Super Bowl championship with coach Bill Belichick, Brady enters his 19th season in New England with more questions than answers. Tight end Rob Gronkowski has been rumored to be considering retirement following the Patriots’ 41-33 defeat in Super Bowl LII last month, and top playoff target Danny Amendola has signed with the Dolphins.

Additionally, the alleged internal strife regarding Belichick’s rigid Patriot Way is said to be contributing to a growing discord among New England’s power players, including Belichick, owner Robert Kraft and Brady himself.

“… I mean, it’s an 18-year marriage, and it’s been an incredibly successful run, but there’s a lot of intensity and a lot of pressure, and a lot of big personalities. And Tom is one of them,” Chopra said. “That hasn’t been easy, and I find it interesting that by the end of the season, that all kind of faded away, because when you get to the end of the season, no matter what is going on, everyone sort of gets on the same page and focuses. Again, they had another incredible run. And that’s what he says at the end — is like, this is a very different offseason for him.”

Though Belichick, Brady and Kraft denied rumors of a rift, the father of three also has his family to think about.

“He’s got three growing kids, a wife who’s like, ‘You know, I’ve kind of been putting stuff on hold for a while, and I wanna go out and do my thing now too,’” Chopra said of Brady and wife Gisele Bündchen. “And so Tom’s juggling a lot of things, and I think that’s basically what he says at the end: I gotta recalibrate. I have to find that conviction again.”

Still, Chopra doubts that Brady will walk away after a heartbreaking Super Bowl defeat.

“This past year was very unsatisfying in terms of how it ended, and so I don’t necessarily envision him leaving that as the last taste to hold onto,” Chopra said.




MISSISSIPPI BANS ABORTION AFTER 15 WEEKS
Governor hails 'safest place in America for an unborn child'
ART MOORE  

Mississippi’s governor signed the most restrictive abortion law in the nation Monday, banning the procedure after 15 weeks while providing no exemptions for rape or incest.

Republican Gov. Phil Bryant said he wants his state to be the “safest place in America for an unborn child.”

Within hours of signing the bill the state’s sole abortion clinic filed a lawsuit.

The new measure does provide exemptions if the pregnant woman’s life or “major bodily function” is threatened, or if the unborn child could not survive outside the womb.

Prior to passage of the law, Mississippi was among 17 states that banned abortion after 20 weeks.

The lawsuit by the Jackson Women’s Health Organization contends the law is unconstitutional and violates other federal court rulings saying a state can’t restrict abortion before a child can survive on its own outside the womb, the Chicago Tribune reported.

“Under decades of United States Supreme Court precedent, the state of Mississippi cannot ban abortion prior to viability, regardless of what exceptions are provided to the ban,” the complaint states.

The Jackson clinic performed 78 abortions in 2017 when the fetus was identified as being 15 weeks or older, the lawsuit points out.

Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the New York-based Center for Reproductive Rights said, according to the Tribune, that politicians “are not above the rule of law, and we are confident this dangerous bill will be struck down like every similar attempt before it.”

Katherine Klein, equality advocacy coordinator for the American Civil Liberties Union of Mississippi, insisted the bill is unconstitutional.

“The 15-week marker has no bearing in science. It’s just completely unfounded and a court has never upheld anything under the 20-week viability marker,” she said.

House Speaker Philip Gunn told the Associated Press he is proud Mississippi is taking steps to protect “the most vulnerable of human life.”

“The winners (today) are those babies that are in the womb, first and foremost,” Gunn said. “Those are the ones we’re trying to protect.”

The New York Times’ Cynical Attack on Missile Defense
By Morgan P. Muchnick  

The New York Times recently published an editorial arguing that the United States shouldn’t invest heavily in its missile defense program.

The editorial board seems to believe that in an era of unprecedented missile threats to the U.S. homeland from rogue regimes such as Iran and North Korea, the U.S. government should decrease investment in one of the best defensive tools. This opinion is misguided and reckless, particularly in regard to Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD)—the only system that can protect the U.S. homeland.

While it is true that missile defense does not offer fool-proof protection, this is not an reasonable argument for failing to invest in the technology. Missile defense is a difficult engineering challenge but it is not beyond the capacity of a country that landed a man on the moon, sends satellites outside our solar system, and develops cutting-edge vaccines. The list of incredibly challenging engineering hurdles that American innovation has cleared would boggle the mind.

We have seen many successful missile tests that demonstrate the effectiveness of GMD over the past few years. This and other missile defense programs have improved to the point that when Sen. Deb Fischer recently asked Head of North American Aerospace Defense Command Lori Robinson about the Times editorial in the context of North Korea, she responded, “I am 100 percent confident in my ability to defend the United States of America.” Failed tests are part of the process and do not mean that we should give-up.

Moreover, the recent increase in missile defense spending approved by Congress and the president, while substantial, is negligible compared to the loss of life and economic destruction that could emanate from a missile attack on a major American city.

So it is particularly strange that the New York Times suggests that even if the United States were able to improve the technology, it would create a perverse incentive to take unnecessary risks or behave aggressively because the missile-defense system would reduce the costs of retaliation. This argument does not take into account the dynamics of our military. All nations throughout the history of warfare have sought to develop the most sophisticated fighting systems, both offensive and defensive. The belief that an American president would unjustly risk the lives of civilians because we had an effective GMD system is the height of cynicism and does not show a realistic understanding of presidential decision-making. I wonder if the New York Times was against submarine hunters during WWI or anti-aircraft missiles protecting the White House.

Finally, the editorial creates a false dichotomy between those who support missile defense and those who want to achieve diplomatic victories and keep military action as a last resort. Not only does this logic ascribe unreasonable motives to advocates of missile defense—a majority in Congress—it ignores the fact that missile defense can actually enhance U.S. deterrence, and thus, increase the likelihood of non-military instruments succeeding.

Driven perhaps by an irrational distrust of those in government, The New York Times editorial board is recommending cuts to the missile defense that would ultimately endanger the homeland.

Peter Schweizer: Mitch McConnell’s Family Fortune Dependent on Chinese Government’s ‘Good Graces’

by ROBERT KRAYCHIK

6157

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Peter Schweizer, president of the Government Accountability Institute, highlighted Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s (R-KY) financial ties to the Chinese government as an example of how politicians monetize political influence while evading financial disclosure regulations.

Schweizer joined Monday’s edition of SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Tonight for an interview with co-hosts Rebecca Mansour and Joel Pollak to discuss McConnell’s linkages to China, as detailed in his latest book, Secret Empires: How the American Political Class Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s (R-KY) familial ties to the Chinese state via his father- and sisters-in-law are causes for concern, deduced Schweizer. James Chao, McConnell’s father-in-law, founded Foremost Group, a shipping company that has done “large volumes of business” with Chinese state-owned companies. McConnell’s wife, Elaine Chao, is the current secretary of transportation.

“So Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader, his wife Elaine Chao, who’s the transportation secretary in the Trump administration, her family has deep economic and financial ties to the Chinese government itself,” said Schweizer. “They are in the shipping business, and they own something called the Foremost Group, and really, in 1993, Mitch McConnell, as a senator, travels to China with his father-in-law, James Chao, as guests of the China State Shipbuilding Corporation.”

He continued, “The China State Shipbuilding Corporation is the largest defense contractor in China, and the projections are that by 2030, if current trends continue, they are going to surpass the U.S. Navy as far as naval capability. Basically, what happens is, the China State Shipbuilding Corporation says to the Chao family, ‘Look, we will build your ships. We will finance the purchase of some of your ships. We will provide crews for your ships. We will provide contracts for you to ship state-owned goods from state-owned companies around the Pacific. In other words, we are going to set you up in the shipping business,’ which is exactly what they do, and, in fact, James Chao — this would be Elaine Chao’s father, Mitch McConnell’s father-in-law — and Elaine’s sister, Angela Chao, actually joined the board, in 2007 and 2008, of something called China State Shipbuilding Corporation, CSSC Holdings, which is a subsidiary of the largest defense contractor in China. So you have this powerful American political family that is making U.S. policy related to China, related to trade, and other critical issues that is highly dependent upon the good graces of the Chinese government.”

Schweizer framed McConnell’s “increasingly soft” political positioning towards China as a function of his familial and financial ties to the Chinese state.

“McConnell himself has benefited because a few years ago, James Chao gave Mitch McConnell a gift between five and twenty-five million dollars that more than quadrupled his net worth overnight,” noted Schweizer. “So this is not just about Elaine Chao’s family getting wealthy. That wealth has now trickled into Mitch McConnell’s pocket, as well, and it’s a huge problem because if you chart the positions that Sen. McConnell has taken on China over the last twenty years, guess what? Shock of all shocks, he has become increasingly soft as it relates to China, and I think it is directly related to the fact that he knows his family’s financial future is tied to the good graces and good faith of the Chinese communist government.”

Schweizer described the Chinese government as “freaked out” over the election of Donald Trump to the presidency, owing to the 45th president’s decades-long view of the “rising threat of China.”

“So the election of Donald Trump, there’s no other way to say it, it completely freaked out the Chinese government because Trump has really been focused — whether one agrees with him on trade policy or not — he has focused since the 1980s on what he regards as a rising threat of China; whether it relates to trade, economics, or military power,” surmised Schweizer.

According to Schweizer, China’s decision to appoint McConnell’s sister-in-law, Angela Chao, to the Bank of China’s board of directors — ten days after 2016’s presidential election — was a response to the election of Trump to the White House.

“So when [Donald Trump] gets elected in 2016, China is in a panic. So one of the things that happens is, they appoint, really, the first American, or only the second foreigner to the Bank of China,” Schweizer said. “Now, the Bank of China is government-run, government-controlled, is sort of the backbone of the Chinese government’s economic diplomacy around the world. Ten days after Donald Trump is elected, they put Elaine Chao’s sister — Mitch McConnell’s sister-in-law — on the board of directors of the fourth largest bank in the world, which is run by the Chinese communist government. It’s a shocking development, and, again, unprecedented in American history that you would have senior political leaders have immediate family members that are sitting on the board of foreign government-owned businesses.”

Breitbart News Tonight airs Monday through Friday on SiriusXM’s Patriot channel 125 from 9:00 p.m. to midnight Eastern (6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Pacific).

Legal expert: McCabe Should Be Worried About Going to Prison

Image via Joseph Sohm / Shutterstock.com

McCabe released a statement after he was canned by Attorney General Jeff Sessions, but he made a major mistake in doing so, because he openly admitted to leaking information to the press.

In a recent post, George Washington University School of Law Professor Jonathan Turley compared the McCabe firing to that of Flynn, stating, “Of course, Flynn is looking at a question of prison rather than a pension.”

His implication in this matter is quite clear… a pension should be the last thing McCabe is worried about because what he did is far worse than Flynn and he absolutely should be looking at jail time.

Firing Demanded by Justice Department Career Officers

One of the misconceptions about the McCabe firing is that it was either Donald Trump or Attorney General Jeff Sessions recommending that McCabe be fired.

While Sessions is the one that pulled the trigger, a move applauded by President Trump, it was actually McCabe’s own counterparts that recommended the move.

They were so outraged by his dishonesty and information leaks, they wanted him gone.

More importantly, they wanted him gone immediately so he would not receive one red cent of his pension.

Flynn Vs. McCabe

As Turley noted, these two cases run parallel in several areas, most notably in Flynn making false statements to investigators.

If investigators believe that McCabe lied to them in regard to the media leaks about the Clinton investigation, what makes this case any different than that of Flynn?

Turley is dead right in that McCabe should now be under investigation for this rather than pitching his case in public about losing his pension.

This just goes to show the difference in today’s Justice Department between how a Trump ally is dealt with compared to someone that would appear to be a Clinton ally, or at the very least, a RINO that is against Trump.

Bringing McCabe to Justice

The first step in making this wrong right has already been taken by Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

Now that McCabe has been terminated, Sessions needs to fully investigate his behavior regarding these leaks to the media.

In a perfect world, both he and Comey would be sharing a table on the defense’s side of the courtroom looking down the barrel of some serious jail time for their crimes against We the People.

Cherokee Genealogist Comes Forward with Damning Truth on Warren’s Ancestry
By Becky Loggia

Democrat Sen. Elizabeth Warren has been criticized over her claim of Native American ancestry, and now one Cherokee genealogist in particular is publicly dismissing her assertion.

On Wednesday, genealogist Twila Barnes called Warren’s claims “ludicrous” and argued that the Massachusetts Democrat had no “respect for true Native Americans,” according to The Washington Times.

Barnes has devoted herself to extensive research into Warren’s family tree as she searched for the claim the Democrat senator insisted was there; however, no evidence pointed to its actual existence.

Barnes also stated that Warren, in her effort to further a high-profile career, has done a thorough job of angering many Native Americans throughout the U.S. by claiming the dubious heritage.

“Some just laugh, because it’s so ludicrous. I mean, you know, she has no proof of anything,” Barnes told Fox News’ Tucker Carlson.

“She’s a lawyer, and she’s supposed to understand you need proof, yet she keeps claiming,” said Barnes, whose own research is published on the website “Thoughts from Polly’s Granddaughter.”

“Many are angry because they feel like she’s appropriating an identity to gain something from that,” she added. “And she has no respect for true Native Americans.”

The claims from Warren had essentially come back to haunt as she seeks re-election in 2018, as the controversy was again spurred by President Donald Trump’s “Pocahontas” remark during an event honoring Navajo veterans.

Warren and others throughout the nation decried the remark as a “racial slur” and demanded an apology from the president in the name of further respect for Native Americans.

Just last week, failed attempts to get the Massachusetts Democrat to take a DNA test in order to prove her heritage had been made, though all have been rejected as Warren doubled down on her claim.

“It’s a part of me and nobody’s going to take that part of me away,” she told host Chuck Todd for NBC‘s “Meet the Press.”

However, some suggest that Warren’s hesitation to prove herself of Indian heritage might actually benefit her in the long run — whether or not she truly is what she claims to be.

“If the Native American ancestry is more than a few generations back, it might not be detectable,” genetic genealogist Ann Turner told The Washington Post.

Turner added that, although the evidence of Native American ancestry could be informative, a negative result wouldn’t rule it out.

“Also, many people who self-identified as Native American a few generations back were already admixed, making it even less likely to be detected.”

G’ day…Ciao…
Helen and Moe Lauzier

Thus articles

that is all articles This time, hopefully can provide benefits to you all. Okay, see you in another article post.

You are now reading the article the link address https://fairyforreference.blogspot.com/2018/03/www_21.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: