Title :
link :
http://ift.tt/2t3211e
.BLOGSPOT. COM
For Sun, Dec. 17, 2017
~All Gave Some~Some Gave
All~God Bless America
Laura Ingraham: Unless Investigated, Mueller’s ‘Irreparably Tainted’ Russia Probe ‘Will and Should’ Collapse
by JOHN NOLTE
Laura Ingraham ripped into the “irreparably tainted” Mueller investigation into Russian collusion with the claim that it is now an example of “how big government can end up becoming a threat to a representative democracy.”
On her Thursday night edition of The Ingraham Angle, Fox News’s latest primetime star opened with a blistering breakdown of the gobsmacking corruption and conflict of interest that has fueled, not only Hillary Clinton’s exoneration over her email scandal, but Robert Mueller’s special counsel investigation into Russian collusion.
Specifically, Ingraham pointed to text messages written FBI Agent Peter Strzok in August of 2016 that read: “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office — that there’s no way [Trump] gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”
Strzok is referring to what was obviously a political meeting in FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s office.
Worse still, earlier that same month, Lisa Page (a key player in Mueller’s Russia probe) texted to Strzok: “Maybe you’re meant to stay where you are because you’re meant to protect the country from that menace [Trump].”
“I can protect our country at many levels,” Strzok replied.
This exchange occurred in the heart of the 2016 presidential election, and these texts relate directly to the idea of stopping Donald Trump from becoming president, to an “insurance policy” if he is elected, to an FBI Agent promising to “protect our country” from Trump on “many levels.”
This is stuff of banana republics and their secret police.
Strzok would go on to play a key role in aiding and abetting former FBI Director James Comey’s inexplicable exoneration of Hillary Clinton. Moreover, at this point, Clinton had spent millions to put together the phony Russia dossier that was almost certainly used by the FBI and the Obama administration to obtain the warrants necessary to spy on their political opponents in the Trump campaign.
Strzok then, inexplicably, became a top investigator for Mueller’s Russia probe, and Mueller only became a special prosecutor after Comey illegally leaked confidential notes to the news media in the hopes the appointment of a special prosecutor would be the result. Another conflict of interest is that Mueller and Comey are close friends.
If that is not bad enough, in 2015, when FBI Deputy Director McCabe’s wife ran for state senate in Virginia, longtime Clintonista Terry McAuliffe funneled some $675,000 into her campaign. The following year, Strzok watered down the language that exonerated Hillary for her prosecutable email crimes.
And if that is not bad enough, Bruce Ohr, a top Justice Department official, is married to Nellie Ohr, who worked for Fusion GPS to put together the discredited Russian dossier.
Hovering over all of this is the number of Hillary Clinton donors hire by Mueller to investigate the man who beat her.
Focusing specifically on the Strzok’s “insurance policy” reassurance to Lisa Page, and calling this text a “smoking gun,” Ingraham broke down exactly how that “insurance” has manifested itself over the last 18 months.
They were intent on preventing him from being elected by any means necessary. And if that meant applying for a FISA warrant based on a phony dossier in order to spy on the campaign, maybe they’d do it. And if it meant deploying the entire mainstream media apparatus into Defcon 1 mode; hyper-ventilating about Russian collusion 24/7, they’d do it.
Ingraham then moved into what this “insurance policy” looks like today as a means to stop Trump from governing.
And today, if it means floating a specious story alleging that the president has early onset dementia, they’ll do that too. Or maybe spreading damaging falsehoods with anonymous sources that are later parroted and then retracted by major news organizations. Yeah, they’ll do that too. … Whatever it takes. As former Mueller investigator Peter Strzok put it, they needed an “insurance policy” to stop Trump.
With only an hour show, Ingraham could not hit on everything, but this “insurance policy” has also manifested itself through inexcusable leaks of President Trump’s phone calls with foreign leaders and Mueller’s apparent desire to derail the (successful) Senate vote on tax reform by announcing, on the morning of the vote, his plea bargain (for a process crime) with Michael Flynn, Trump’s former National Security Adviser.
“The Founders never envisioned that a separate office inside the executive branch could hire a bunch of agenda-driven investigators, in search of a crime, by the head of the executive branch [Trump],” Ingraham said, and then called on FBI Deputy Director McCabe to be fired over many things, including his apparent role in planning to “subvert Trump’s campaign, or if elected, his ability to lead the government as president of the United States.”
Although she said she is tempted, Ingraham did not call for Mueller to be fired, but did say his investigation is “irreparably tainted” and needs to be investigated. If not, she believes his investigation “will and should” collapse over these “endless revelations of bias.”
Presidential hopeful wants Finland out of EU, says nationalists will bounce back
Finns Party deputy chairman and presidential candidate Huhtasaari poses for a picture in Helsinki Thomson ReutersBy Jussi Rosendahl and Tuomas Forsell
HELSINKI (Reuters) - Finland will leave the European Union and position itself as the Switzerland of the north to protect its independence if Laura Huhtasaari, the presidential candidate of the eurosceptic Finns Party has her way.
She also told Reuters in an interview she wants to tighten immigration rules.
Huhtasaari -- dubbed "Finland's Marine Le Pen" after France's National Front leader -- is a long-shot. But she believes she has a real chance in the January election as her party has taken a fresh start following its removal from the coalition government in June.
"The rise in Europe of parties that are critical towards the EU and immigration is due to bad, unjust politics," she said. "The role for Finland in the euro zone is the role of a loser and payer…
"I do not want Finland to become a province of EU, Finns must stand up for Finland's interests."
The Finns Party, formerly called "True Finns", rose from obscurity during the euro zone debt crisis with an anti-EU platform, complicating the bloc's bailout talks with troubled states.
It expanded into the second-biggest parliamentary party in 2015 and joined the government, but then saw its support drop due to compromises in the three-party coalition.
This June, the party picked a new hard-line leadership and got kicked out of the government, while more than half of its lawmakers left the party and formed a new group to keep their government seats.
Huhtasaari, 38, who was picked as deputy party leader in June, said voters were still confused after the split-up but that the party would eventually bounce back.
"The game is really brutal. The biggest parties want us to disappear from the political map. No-one is in politics looking for friends."
The Finns party ranks fifth in polls with a support of 9 percent, down from 17.7 percent in 2015 parliamentary election, while the new "Blue Reform" group, which has five ministers, is backed by only 1-2 percent.
STEP FORWARD, STEP BACK
Incumbent President Sauli Niinisto, who originally represented the centre-right NCP party, is widely expected to be elected for a second six-year term by a wide margin.
A poll by Alma Media last week showed 64 percent of voters supporting Niinisto while 12 percent backed lawmaker Pekka Haavisto from the Greens. Huhtasaari, a first term lawmaker, was backed by 3 percent of those polled.
"Things happen slowly when you're fighting against the hegemony... I still have time before the elections," she said.
Huhtasaari, who supports U.S. President Donald Trump and Britain's former UK Independence Party leader Nigel Farage, said the European eurosceptic movement was gradually strengthening despite a series of blows to anti-establishment parties.
France's National Front and Italy's 5-Star Movement failed in attempts to win legislative and civic elections while UKIP won no seats in the British parliament, albeit that its goal of Brexit won a referendum.
"Any change takes time, a step forward and step back... But the movement strengthens all the time," she said, noting Austria's Freedom Party's strong performance in October elections.
Markku Jokisipila, the director at the Center for Parliamentary Studies of the University of Turku, said Huhtasaari was unlikely to succeed in the Jan 28 election.
Around 70 percent of Finns support EU membership and the centre-right government is committed to the euro.
"There's no way around it, she is very inexperienced politically for this election," Jokisipila said.
He added that the Finns party had become more united after the June split-up, but that it was now too focused on its anti-immigration and anti-EU platforms to be able to increase support.
"They will not disappear from the Finnish politics. The challenge is to broaden their profile... but they have also proved that they do have surprise potential."
(Reporting by Jussi Rosendahl and Tuomas Forsell Editing by Jeremy Gaunt)
Fake News: CNN’s Jim Acosta Claims ‘1,552 Mass Shootings’ Since Sandy Hook
by AWR HAWKINS
On December 14, 2017, CNN’s Jim Acosta claimed America has witnessed “1,552 mass shootings” since the heinous attack on Sandy Hook Elementary School.
This means Acosta is claiming an average of approximately 310 mass shootings a year for each of the past five years.
It is important to note that he attempts to bolster this claim via information provided by a tracking site sponsored by gun controllers. That tracking site–the Gun Violence Archive–diverges from FBI definition of a mass shooting as four fatalities or more in one incident so as to include shootings in which no fatalities occur.
Acosta tweeted:
Since Sandy Hook there have been at least 1,552 mass shootings, with at least 1,767 people killed and 6,227 wounded. http://ift.tt/2t3796l …
Mass shootings since Sandy Hook, in one map
This interactive shows the locations and stories of these tragic events.
Other members of the left have been spewing similar numbers for years. At times, their claims have gotten so outlandish that members of their own circles have called them out for it.
For example, in December 2015 Breitbart News reported that Mother Jones’ editor Mark Follman called out leftists for claiming “355 mass shootings” in that calendar year alone. Follman published a column in the The New York Times, which said:
At Mother Jones, where I work as an editor, we have compiled an in-depth open-source database covering more than three decades of public mass shootings. By our measure, there have been four “mass shootings” this year, including the one in San Bernardino, and at least 73 such attacks since 1982.
Note–using the actual FBI definition of mass shootings, Follman could only find four mass shootings for the entire year, yet leftists were claiming 355.
Think about it this way–It is easy to swell the number of car accidents recorded for a given year if butterflies hitting the windshield are counted as an accident. Moreover, it is easy to swell the number of falls recorded every year if stumbling without actually falling is counting as a fall nonetheless.
In the same way, it is easy to swell the number of mass shootings if the definition of mass shooting is changed so as to include street crimes in which no one is killed or by including the life of the attacker in the reported number of deaths resulting from an alleged shooting. The Gun Violence Archive does both these things and Acosta’s tweet ultimately rests on that approach to claim “1552 mass shootings” during the past five years.
AWR Hawkins is an award-winning Second Amendment columnist for Breitbart News, the host of the Breitbart podcast Bullets, and the writer/curator of Down Range with AWR Hawkins, a weekly newsletter focused on all things Second Amendment, also for Breitbart News. He is the political analyst for Armed American Radio. Follow him on Twitter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com. Sign up to get Down Range at http://ift.tt/2AC36Vm
In a statement to POLITICO Rep. Marcy Kaptur said she never meant to suggest that women are to blame for harassment they experience. | Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP
Democratic lawmaker: Women's clothing an 'invitation' to harassment
'I saw a member yesterday with her cleavage so deep it was down to the floor,' Rep. Marcy Kaptur tells fellow Democrats at a private meeting.
A female Democratic House member shocked fellow lawmakers Wednesday when she said that the revealing clothing that some members and staffers wear is an “invitation” to sexual harassment.
Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio) made the comments during a private Democratic Caucus meeting Wednesday to discuss sexual harassment issues, according to two Democratic sources in the room.
“I saw a member yesterday with her cleavage so deep it was down to the floor,” Kaptur said, according to the sources present. “And what I’ve seen … it's really an invitation.” The comments left many others in the room stunned, the sources said.
Kaptur said women on Capitol Hill should have to abide by a stricter dress code, like those adopted by the military or corporations.
“Maybe I’ll get booed for saying this, but many companies and the military [have] a dress code,” she said. “I have been appalled at some of the dress of ... members and staff. Men have to wear ties and suits.”
In a statement to POLITICO later Wednesday, Kaptur said she never meant to suggest that women are to blame for harassment they experience.
“When I was first elected to Congress my office and I became a refuge for female staffers who had been mistreated by their bosses. Some of them in tears many days. It is something I carry with me to this day and something I brought up during our Caucus meeting," she said. "Under no circumstances is it the victim's fault if they are harassed in any way. I shared the stories from my time here in the context of the ‘Me Too’ legislation and how we can elevate the decorum and the dress code to protect women from what is a pervasive problem here and in society at large.”
Two Democratic sources said other members and staffers present in the meeting were so surprised that no one knew what to say. “Nearly everyone in the room’s mouths were wide open aghast,” one of those sources said.
Kaptur, 71, has served in Congress since 1983. She’s the longest serving member of the Ohio delegation, representing a northern district that borders Lake Erie.
The dress code for female members, staffers and reporters has been relaxed in recent months after Ryan moved to modernize the rules following outcry about women not being able to wear sleeveless dresses in and around the House chamber. Both women and men are still expected to dress professionally, but the sergeant-at-arms isn't as strict in enforcing rules about women's shoulders being covered when present in the House chamber or Speaker's lobby.
Kaptur’s comments come as Congress continues to reckon with a raft of sexual harassment allegations within its ranks.
Three members — Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) and Reps. John Conyers (D-Mich.) and Trent Franks (R-Ariz.) — resigned last week over sexual misconduct allegations.
Rep. Ruben Kihuen (D-Nev.) has also been accused of sexual harassment but has rebuffed calls from House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and others to step down. And Republican Roy Moore lost the Alabama Senate race — the first time a Democrat won a Senate seat there in 25 years — after being dogged by allegations he sexually pursued teenagers while in his 30s.
Fake News and Republican Tax Cuts
Republicans are wrapping up the biggest tax cut bill since 1986.
Think of it – the biggest tax cut in 31 years.
The elite media has spent weeks attacking, distorting, and undermining the GOP tax cuts. Every Democratic attack, no matter how false or distorted, has been covered extensively. Liberal columnists and analysts have laboriously written and opined on television against the bill.
If a provision cuts taxes for millions of Americans but raises taxes for a few thousand, the elite media skips the winners to focus on the small number of losers.
At the same time, the eight-year underperformance of the Obama Administration in jobs, take-home pay, and economic growth is ignored by the elite media, while the already accelerating economic growth during the first year of the Trump presidency is under-reported or downplayed.
Similarly, there is little coverage of the remarkable jump in small business owner confidence or the equally impressive improvement in corporate CEO optimism.
The fake news game being played against the historic Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 is designed to take away all of the political advantages Republicans ought to be gaining.
Consider the facts:
-
The Republican tax cut takes a big step toward the Trump campaign goal of implementing a 15 percent corporate tax rate. The corporate rate’s reduction from 35 percent to 21 percent would have been unthinkable two years ago.
-
The pass-through provision to enable small businesses to also get a strong tax cut has won enthusiastic support from the National Federation of Independent Businesses and the Job Creators Network (two of the leading small business associations). Note also that the media completely distorted NFIB’s questions about early versions of the bill and presented the group’s honest concerns as total opposition.
-
The Republican tax cut bill will boost job creation and includes strong middle class and pro-family provisions. Increasing the Child Tax Credit to up to $2,000 and doubling the standard deduction will have an incredibly positive impact on middle class families.
-
The simplification and increased deduction will allow nine out of 10 Americans to file their taxes on a form the size of a postcard. The savings in time and money that used to be spent on tax preparers will be a further advantage for most Americans.
Republicans are close to the end, but the fight isn’t over.
Republicans need to be prepared to win the argument. They have to assume the liberal media will continue to push fake stories about this legislation, and they need to be ready to counter these distorted, false claims.
In every interview, Republicans must be prepared to correct reporters and anchors when they start using phony examples and false "facts."
Republicans should use social media to reach every big winner in the tax cut bill – starting with small business owners.
Writing a good bill is only step one.
Communicating the bill effectively, despite falsehoods and distortions in fake news, is the vital second step – and it requires serious commitment.
If Republicans reach every person who is helped by this bill, they will win decisively in 2018.
The Democrats who do not vote for this bill will have to explain why they are against reduced taxes, lower unemployment, a simpler tax code, and more American job creation.
Winning the argument over the tax bill may be the most crucial step toward victory in 2018.
Your Friend,
Newt Gingrich
Huckabee Makes Announcement About His Daughter
By Joe Setyon
Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee responded Wednesday to some of the criticism that his daughter, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, has received recently.
Sanders was lambasted earlier in the day by “Morning Joe” co-host Mika Brzezisnki for her defense of a tweet from President Donald Trump that some saw as sexist.
“I want to know how she does that,” Brzezisnki said, adding that Trump “should have apologized for being a sexist pig.”
“Sarah Huckabee Sanders, I feel sorry for you,” she said later in the segment. “I started a hashtag ‘Support for Sarah’ and ‘get your mind out of the gutter’ in your quest for truth, in quest for goodness, in your quest for love country, because you haven’t made it there yet.”
But according to Huckabee, the “Morning Joe” co-host is the one who ought to be ashamed.
“I was stunned that of all the people who are going to give a lecture on morality and family, and marriage, it’s going to be Mika? I’m sorry, but I just found that stunning,” Huckabee said during a Wednesday night appearance on Fox News.
He then noted that Sanders “deserves better” treatment from women who constantly criticize her.“She deserves better from other women and it just amazes me that even the women who say they are feminists are doing everything they can to discredit my daughter,” he said.
“My daughter stands strong and tough and walks into that lions den of a press room every day and represents women and represents the president and represents strength in an incredible way.”
Huckabee also pointed out that his daughter is an exemplary mom and wife, as well as “a terrific public servant.”
“Mika can go pound sand somewhere as far as I’m concerned,” he added.
The feud started after Trump put out a tweet Tuesday calling New York Democrat Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand a “total flunky” who would “do anything” for campaign contributions.
Lightweight Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a total flunky for Chuck Schumer and someone who would come to my office “begging” for campaign contributions not so long ago (and would do anything for them), is now in the ring fighting against Trump. Very disloyal to Bill & Crooked-USED!
8:03 AM - Dec 12, 2017
Later that morning, Brzezisnki called on Sanders to either refuse to defend the president or resign.
“Sarah Huckabee Sanders: good luck today in the briefing. Don’t lie. And do not defend the president of the United States for what he did,” she said, according to Mediaite.
“If you do,” she continued, “you should resign.”
During the White House media briefing, Sanders did defend Trump’s tweet, saying that “only if your mind is in the gutter” could it be interpreted as a sexual innuendo.
“He was obviously talking about political partisan games that people often play and the broken system that he’s talked about repeatedly,” she added. “This isn’t new, this isn’t a new sentiment, this isn’t new terminology.”
On Thursday, “Morning Joe” co-host Joe Scarborough chimed in on the controversy, specifically Huckabee’s reference to Brzezisnki’s “lecture” on marriage.
Later that morning, Brzezisnki called on Sanders to either refuse to defend the president or resign.
“Sarah Huckabee Sanders: good luck today in the briefing. Don’t lie. And do not defend the president of the United States for what he did,” she said, according to Mediaite.
“If you do,” she continued, “you should resign.”
During the White House media briefing, Sanders did defend Trump’s tweet, saying that “only if your mind is in the gutter” could it be interpreted as a sexual innuendo.
“He was obviously talking about political partisan games that people often play and the broken system that he’s talked about repeatedly,” she added. “This isn’t new, this isn’t a new sentiment, this isn’t new terminology.”
On Thursday, “Morning Joe” co-host Joe Scarborough chimed in on the controversy, specifically Huckabee’s reference to Brzezisnki’s “lecture” on marriage.
“What a sleazy thing to do,” Scarborough said. “You go and you actually talk about — Mika never talked about marriage.”
“She never lectured on the morality of any of that,” he claimed. “What a sleazy thing for you to do. What a judgmental, predictably stupid thing to do.”
What Were Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin Trying to Hide?
By Frank Gaffney
Former Secretary of State and Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton (right) whispers into top aide Huma Abedin's ear (left) (Screenshot)
The U.S. government has known for thirteen years that the Muslim Brotherhood’s mission in America is “destroying Western civilization from within” by our hands. Consequently, none of these Sharia-supremacists should have been allowed anywhere near our government.
So, when then-Rep. Michele Bachmann and four of her colleagues asked the State Department in 2012 about the ties its Deputy Chief of Staff, Huma Abedin, had with the jihadist Muslim Brotherhood, their concerns deserved careful scrutiny. Instead, Ms. Bachmann especially was vilified as an “Islamophobe” and the questions went unanswered.
Yesterday, Judicial Watch revealed that Ms. Abedin was allowed to remove—and presumably destroy—papers about “Muslim engagement” when she and her boss, Hillary Clinton, left the Department.
Inquiring minds want to know: Did Abedin actually enable the Muslim Brotherhood’s infiltration, yet another example of the Clinton team’s betrayal of our national security?
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. is President of the Center for Security Policy (http://ift.tt/1hXFXNU), a columnist for the Washington Times .
Brady vs Roethlisberger as Patriots, Steelers clash
Rob Woollard
Los Angeles (AFP) - Tom Brady will aim to extend his record of dominance over Ben Roethlisberger as the New England Patriots face the Pittsburgh Steelers in a pivotal clash between the two NFL heavyweights on Sunday.
For the first time in the history of the NFL, two starting quarterbacks will have a combined total of seven Super Bowl titles between them when the AFC clash kicks off at Pittsburgh's Heinz Field.
Brady, 40, owns five of those Super Bowl crowns against Roethlisberger's two, a margin of superiority that is echoed in the two veterans' head-to-head record. In nine previous meetings, Brady has won seven times, Roethlisberger twice.
In their most recent encounter, during last season's AFC Conference championship, the Patriots romped to a 36-16 win in Foxborough, their fourth straight victory over the Steelers.
This season, Brady and Roethlisberger are leading the league in passing. Brady has 3,685 yards and 27 touchdowns while Roethlisberger is just behind on 3,744 yards and 24 touchdowns.
Roethlisberger was in no doubt about Brady's place in the pantheon when asked about his long-time adversary this week.
"He's the best in the world," Roethlisberger, 35, said. "Maybe the best who has ever done it. I'm happy to be part of this game."
Yet despite Brady's winning record, the Steelers will head into the game as the form team. With 11 wins and only two defeats this season, a victory for Pittsburgh on Sunday will guarantee Roethlisberger's men home-enjoyed field advantage throughout the playoffs.
As well as the evergreen Roethlisberger, Pittsburgh have enjoyed dazzling seasons from their other two offensive linchpins -- running back Le'Veon Bell and receiver Antonio Brown.
Bell leads the league with 1,105 rushing yards while Bell heads the receivers rankings with 99 catches for 1,509 yards.
The Patriots meanwhile were jolted this week by an upset defeat to the Miami Dolphins on Monday. The Super Bowl champions fell to 10-3 with the loss, meaning Sunday's game is a virtual must-win if they are to have any chance of taking home-field advantage for the postseason.
- 'A lot of urgency' -
"We have to figure out a way to play a lot better and I am confident we will put out a good plan," Brady said.
"There will be lot of urgency. We know what we're up against and we will try to put out our best game of the year."
One final thing today:
Great Orators of the Democrat Party....Past and Now
Great Orators of the Democrat Party....Past and Now
THEN:
"One man with courage makes a majority." ~Andrew Jackson
"The only thing we have to fear is fear itself." ~ Franklin D. Roosevelt
"The buck stops here." ~ Harry S. Truman
"Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country." ~John F. Kennedy
AND NOW:
Great Orators of the Democrat Party –;TODAY:
"It depends what your definition of 'is' is?'' ~President William Jefferson Clinton
"It depends what your definition of 'is' is?'' ~President William Jefferson Clinton
"Those rumors are false. I believe in the sanctity of marriage." ~ John Edwards
"What difference does it make?" (re: Benghazi ) ~ Hillary Clinton
"I invented the Internet." ~ Al Gore
" America is, is no longer, uh, what it, uh, could be, uh, what it was once was, uh, and I say to myself, uh, I don't want that future, uh, for my children." ~ Barack Obama
"I have campaigned in all 57 states." ~ Barack Obama (Quoted 2008)
"You don't need God anymore; you have us Democrats." ~Nancy Pelosi (Quoted 2006) (A really, really stupid remark.)
"Paying taxes is voluntary." ~ Sen. Harry Reid
"Bill is the greatest husband and father I know. No one is more faithful, true, and honest than he is." ~ Hillary Rodham Clinton (Quoted1998)
"You have a business. You didn't build that. Someone else did!" ~ Barack Obama (Quoted 2012)
And the most ridiculous gem of wisdom, from the "Mother Superior Moron ": "We just have to pass the Healthcare Bill to see what's in it." ~ Nancy Pelosi (Quoted March,2010) (As one Doctor said: “;That is also the perfect definition of a stool sample.”)
Beyond a doubt, the greatest statement of all was made by Democrat House Speaker Sam Rayburn at the first Congressional session after Ted Kennedy was caught, on camera, having sex with one of his aides on the deck of his yacht ..."Ah see that the good Senatuh from the great state of Massutwoshits has changed his position on off shore drillin" !
HOW FORTUNATE WE ARE TO HAVE HAD SUCH BRILLIANT MINDS IN CHARGE OF OUR ONCE - GREAT COUNTRY!!
A Great Republican:
"Life is tough! It's even tougher when you're stupid.'' ~ John Wayne
A final thought for today...
A final thought for today...
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work really hard to remain stupid.” ~ Benjamin Franklin ~
G’ day…Ciao…
Helen and Moe Lauzier
Thus articles
that is all articles
This time, hopefully can provide benefits to you all. Okay, see you in another article post.
You are now reading the article the link address https://fairyforreference.blogspot.com/2017/12/httpift_16.html
0 Response to " "
Post a Comment