Title :
link :
http://ift.tt/2t3211e
.BLOGSPOT. COM.
For Tues., Nov. 7, 2017
~All Gave Some~Some Gave
All~God Bless America
What NFL sellouts? San Fran Sunday.
Friends…
Obama CIA Director Caught In Sick Trump Plot, He Went Too Far
Frank Spear
CLICK TO JOIN
Former CIA Director John Brennan met with former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on CNN. They discussed what they think President Donald Trump should do moving forward, and revealed their bias in a shocking light.
Former CIA Director John Brennan met with former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on CNN. They discussed what they think President Donald Trump should do moving forward, and revealed their bias in a shocking light.
Special Counsel Robert Mueller was tasked with investigating the rumors of President Trump colluding with Russia. The topic switched to whether President Trump should fire Mueller. “I think it’s the obligation of some executive branch officials to refuse to carry that out. I would just hope that this is not going to be a partisan issue. That Republicans, Democrats are going to see that the future of this government is at stake and something needs to be done for the good of the future,” Brennan said, according to CNN.
The two met with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer. Both Brennan and Clapper served former-President Obama. They both, as imagined, expressed their confidence in Mueller.
“Absolutely. It was an inspired choice — they don’t come any better, ” Brennan said. He continued, “If Mueller is fired, I hope our elected reps will stand up and say enough is enough.”
Former CIA Director John Brennan
Despite the ties discovered between Paul Manafort and John Podesta, who both worked with each presidential candidate during the election, they seem to ignore this factor.
Clapper went on to say that he thinks the Russian interference in the US occurred. He pointed to the meeting, which showed nothing, when Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort met with a Russian lawyer.
At this point, Clapper explained that he has always had “great suspicions about the Russians and what they do,” because he is a “Cold War warrior.” However, he has not spoken up about his distrust of Russia until President Trump was allegedly involved.
Then, Blitzer asked Clapper about when President Trump said the intelligence community under President Trump was like Nazi Germany. Surprisingly, he said that he found it to be a “terrible” and “insulting.”
Don’t forget that the Left has been accusing President Trump of being a modern-day Hitler. Yet, Clapper did not note that this was an offensive comment and seemed perfectly fine with this line of insults.
He then said that he was so insulted by the comment that he called President Trump personally before he took over the White House. Clapper said that President Trump asked him to rebut the information put out in the dossier, which is now known to be funded by the DNC.
On the topic of the Dossier, Blitzer said, “The whole point of the dossier, by the way, was we felt an obligation to warn him to alert him to the fact it was out there. That was the whole point.”
Many people are starting to see the truth as it has been exposed based on the dossier, Mueller’s investigation — which hasn’t turned up anything on Trump and Russia — and the Podesta Group.
CNN has a new campaign called “facts first,” but they don’t seem to follow their own promise as the facts are constantly distorted to reflect their left-leaning political bias.
Donna Brazile: For Those Who Are Telling Me to Shut Up, I Tell Them ‘Go to Hell’
by PAM KEY
Who would you prefer to dine with?
Sunday on ABC’s “This Week,” former Democratic National Committee interim chairwoman Donna Brazile discussed the controversy created by her upcoming book “Hacks” and said to those who are telling her to shut up should “go to hell.”
Brazile said, “For those who are telling me to shut up, they told Hillary that a couple months ago. You know what I tell them? Go to hell. I’m going to tell my story.”
She added, “I’m not on the payroll, George. I care about my country. I care about our democracy. And I say go to hell, because why am I supposed to be the only person that is unable to tell my story?”
Critics of the book are unhappy about revelations that in August 2015, Hillary Clinton signed an agreement to control the party’s finances and strategy before the 2016 Democratic primary was decided by the voters.
Abortion Lobby Denies Science Concerning Beginning of Human Life
by THOMAS D. WILLIAMS, PH.D.
Reuters
In a bold new article, abortion advocates attack President Trump’s HHS plan promising protection for Americans “at every stage of life, beginning at conception” by claiming that “life doesn’t begin at conception.”
The article, which appeared in Romper, cites all the usual suspects of Big Abortion, such as Planned Parenthood and the Center for Reproductive Rights, to back up its incredible assertion that a human zygote is not a human being.
Curiously, the one authority not cited is the one that really matters: embryology texts for medical schools.
In her piece titled “3 Ways Science Proves Life Doesn’t Begin At Conception, Despite What The HHS Strategic Plan Is Telling You,” writer Alana Romain embarks on the herculean task of defending the indefensible claim that human life starts sometime after conception.
Readers may already start wondering about the cogency of Ms. Romain’s argument when only one of the “3 ways science proves life doesn’t begin at conception” even deals with the question.
Points 2 and 3 propose the unremarkable and universally accepted notions that “Many Complications Can (And Often Do) Occur Between Fertilization & Birth” and “Without The Mother, The Embryo Wouldn’t Survive.” The only problem with these self-evident propositions is that they have absolutely nothing to do with the thesis that “science proves life doesn’t begin at conception.”
Point 1 is the only argument worth addressing, and bears the odd title “A Fertilized Egg Can Turn Into A Baby — But That Doesn’t Mean It Will.”
The heart of Ms. Romain’s contention is that ideological opposition to abortion leads to an oversimplification of what is really a very complex biological reality:
But as medical experts have pointed out, fertilization shouldn’t be considered the beginning of life, because, well, biology is much more complicated and flawed than our ideological opinions might like it to be.
This isn’t much of an argument, and unfortunately for Ms. Romain and other abortion advocates, it doesn’t correspond to what science actually teaches. Even a cursory look through basic human embryology textbooks reveals an unmistakable pattern: a genetically unique human individual comes into being at the moment that the sperm fertilizes the ovum.
One of the standard texts in the field of embryology, for instance, called Patten’s Foundations of Embryology, states simply: “Almost all higher animals start their lives from a single cell, the fertilized ovum (zygote)… The time of fertilization represents the starting point in the life history, or ontogeny, of the individual.”
Or as William Larsen’s classic Human Embryology notes: “The chromosomes of the oocyte and sperm are…respectively enclosed within female and male pronuclei. These pronuclei fuse with each other to produce the single, diploid, 2N nucleus of the fertilized zygote. This moment of zygote formation may be taken as the beginning or zero time point of embryonic development.”
To propose that after conception the fertilized egg “might” become a human being raises the uncomfortable question of when exactly that might occur. In a normal pregnancy there simply is no other critical moment when the nature of the little human individual is altered in any significant way.
If pro-choice advocates are honest, they should have the courage to admit the science behind human embryonic development and if they still want to defend the morality of abortion, they should do so based on the truth rather than on make-believe.
The more lucid argument, “Yes, abortion means terminating the life of a human being but sometimes that is a morally acceptable choice,” as articulated by Naomi Wolf among others, is a much more truthful way to approach the debate.
In Ms. Wolfe’s groundbreaking 1995 essay “Our Bodies, Our Souls: Rethinking Pro-Choice Rhetoric” in The New Republic, the feminist icon contended that the pro-choice movement needed to come to grips with the fact that abortion is in fact the killing of a human individual, rather than a mass of biological “tissue.” The “slogan ‘Abortion stops a beating heart’ is incontrovertibly true,” she wrote.
As long as pro-choice advocates refuse to acknowledge the truth about abortion, the pro-life movement would always have the upper hand, she argued.
“Clinging to a rhetoric about abortion in which there is no life and no death, we entangle our beliefs in a series of self-delusions, fibs and evasions,” she wrote.
“Many pro-choice advocates developed a language to assert that the foetus isn’t a person, and this, over the years, has developed into a lexicon of dehumanization,” she stated.
The debate on abortion can only advance when people face the facts of what actually occurs. And yes, that means acknowledging the scientific fact that human life begins at conception.
Follow Thomas D. Williams on Twitter
Follow Thomas D. Williams on Twitter
RUSSIA AND US TEAM UP AGAINST NORTH KOREA
Both the United States and Russia sent nuclear-capable bombers on a mission near North Korea as tensions mount over dictator Kim Jong Un’s threats.
A U.S. B-2 stealth bomber flew from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri to the Pacific area over the weekend, according to The U.K. Sun.
U.S. Strategic Command said in a statement the long-range mission was carried out to “familiarize aircrew with air bases and operations in different geographic combatant commands, enabling them to maintain a high state of readiness and proficiency.”
The mission came just prior to President Donald Trump’s visit to Asia, assuring Japan and South Korea that the U.S. it’s committed to helping its allies defend itself against any threats from North Korea.
The statement referred to the mission as “a visible demonstration of commitment to our allies and enhancing regional security.”
The Russian Defense Ministry said both U.S. and Japanese fighter jets accompanied Russia’s missile-carrying bombers during flights over the Pacific.
“Two strategic bombers Tupolev-95MS of Russia’s Aerospace Force have carried out routine flights over international waters of the Sea of Japan and the western part of the Pacific Ocean,” a Russian spokesman said, according to The Sun.
“It means we hope that the U.S. will expand its missions on the Korean Peninsula without any concerns over issues of maintenance, fuel supplies and so forth,” an unidentified source told the South Korean Yonhap News Agency.
On Saturday, Defense Secretary James Mattis said North Korea’s continued commitment to launch a nuclear-capable missile has brought “a new urgency” to military and diplomatic efforts with South Korea.
“North Korea has accelerated the threat that it poses to its neighbors and the world through its illegal and unnecessary missile and nuclear weapons programs,” Mattis said, as reported by CNN.
“I cannot imagine a condition under which the United States would accept North Korea as a nuclear power,” he added.
Trump has vowed that the U.S. will protect itself and its allies at all costs following several provocative tests and countless threats from the North Korean regime.
In September, Trump said the possibility of using military action against North Korea was not off the table.
“Military action would certainly be an option,” Trump said. “It would be great if something else could be worked out.”
Trump suggested that the U.S. didn’t want to use military force, but indicated the aggressive behavior from North Korea would not be tolerated for much longer.
“Each day, new equipment is delivered; new and beautiful equipment, the best in the world — the best anywhere in the world, by far,” Trump said, referring to the power of the U.S. military.
Source: http://ift.tt/UVnYui
FOIA DOCUMENTS REVEAL FBI SCRAMBLED TO SAVE RECORDS IN URANIUM ONE SCANDAL
FBI had been investigating Uranium One since 2015
An internet researcher has uncovered what appears to be proof that the FBI was investigating the Uranium One deal back in 2015 – months after the Peter Schweizer book Clinton Cash exposed the scheme, along with an article in the New York Times which laid out allegations of criminal malfeasance by the Clintons, their charitable foundation, and several associates.
Twitter user Katica (@GOPPollAnalyst) – who notably discovered Hillary Clinton’s IT guy ‘Stonetear’ asking Reddit users how to strip Clinton’s name from archived emails – discovered several Preservation and Records requests sent by an FBI special agent to various agencies involved in the approval of the Uranium One deal on August 28th, 2015, as first published by The Conservative Treehouse. Katica found the requests buried in an FBI file released via the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
Revealing Timeline
While the Clinton email investigation was launched in March of 2015 after it was revealed that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton used a personal server and non-approved email accounts to conduct government business, reports from August, 2015 revealed that the FBI investigation was actually a criminal probe – though most assumed it was simply covering Clinton’s mishandling of classified information and not the content of her emails.
What Katica discovered is that weeks after the criminal probe began, the FBI sent notices to every agency involved in the Uranium One approval process to preserve records.
Revealing Timeline
While the Clinton email investigation was launched in March of 2015 after it was revealed that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton used a personal server and non-approved email accounts to conduct government business, reports from August, 2015 revealed that the FBI investigation was actually a criminal probe – though most assumed it was simply covering Clinton’s mishandling of classified information and not the content of her emails.
What Katica discovered is that weeks after the criminal probe began, the FBI sent notices to every agency involved in the Uranium One approval process to preserve records.
This is huge…The agencies which received the request included the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the U.S. Dept. of Treasury, the Office of Director of National Intelligence (ODNI James Clapper), The National Counter Terrorism Center, and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).
Five days after the initial request, the same FBI agent sent another round of notifications to the same agencies, adding the National Security Agency (NSA) and the U.S. Secret Service (USSS).
The next day, September 3rd, 2015, three more agencies were added to the preservation request: The CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and the Department of Defense (DOD)
At this point, every single member of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) which signed off on the Uranium One deal was served with a notice to preserve records.
As The Conservative Treehouse notes:
It would be intellectually dishonest not to see the very likely attachment of the special agent’s action. That is to say an FBI probe originating as an outcome of information retrieved in parallel to the timing of the “criminal probe” of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s email use.
The sequence of events highlights a criminal probe starting [early August 2015], followed by notifications to the “Uranium One” CFIUS participants [late August 2015].
If you consider the larger Clinton timeline; along with the FBI special agent requests from identified participants; and overlay the Nuclear Regulatory Commission as the leading entity surrounding the probe elements; and the fact that the CFIUS participants were the recipients of the retention requests; well, it’s just too coincidental to think this is unrelated to the Uranium One deal and the more alarming implications.
FBI Mole
Let’s not forget a bombshell report from The Hill two weeks ago which revealed that as early as 2009, the FBI – led by Robert Mueller at the time, had a mole in the Russian uranium industry, and that the agency had evidence that “Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow” – a deal which would grant the Kremlin control over 20 percent of America’s uranium supply.
The mole was forced to sign an ironclad non-disclosure agreement (NDA) which threatened criminal penalties for revealing information, even to Congress. After a request was made by Reps Ron DeSantis (R-FL) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA) calling for the Justice department to invalidate the NDA, the gag order was lifted, and the FBI informant was authorized to speak with congress.
Lou Dobbs ✔@LouDobbs
BREAKING: DOJ authorizes FBI Informant to speak with Congress concerning alleged corruption involving Clintons & Uranium One. #MAGA #DTS
6:59 PM - Oct 25, 2017
Tony Podesta and Uranium One
While one-time Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort turned himself in to the FBI a week ago on charges of money laundering, let’s not forget what a former Podesta Group executive interviewed by Special Counsel Robert Mueller told Tucker Carlson Tonight: the FBI probe is now focusing on people in Washington who have worked as de-facto operatives on behalf of Russian government and business. To that end, he had quite a bit to say about his former boss Tony and his relationship to the Uranium One deal.
In late 2013 or early 2014, Tony Podesta and a representative for the Clinton Foundation met to discuss how to help Uranium One – the Russian owned company that controls 20 percent of American Uranium Production – and whose board members gave over $100 million to the Clinton Foundation.
In 2013, John Podesta recommended that Tony hire David Adams, Hillary Clinton’s chief adviser at the State Department, giving them a “direct liaison” between the group’s Russian clients and Hillary Clinton’s State Department.
“Tony Podesta was basically part of the Clinton Foundation.”
As far as the current state of the FBI investigation, “They are more focused on facilitators of Russian influence in this country than they are on election collusion,” Carlson’s source told Fox.
Tying it together – previous reports of Federal investigations into the Clinton Foundation:
Katica’s FOIA discovery corroborates a New York Times report from November 1, 2016, which asserts that an FBI investigation was kicked off based on revelations of pay-for-play in the book “Clinton Cash” written by Peter Schweizer:
The investigation, based in New York, had not developed much evidence and was based mostly on information that had surfaced in news stories and the book “Clinton Cash,” according to several law enforcement officials briefed on the case.
The book asserted that foreign entities gave money to former President Bill Clinton and the Clinton Foundation, and in return received favors from the State Department when Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state. Mrs. Clinton has adamantly denied those claims. -NYT
The Wall St. Journal also reported last October that five FBI field offices were investigating the Clinton Foundation; New York, Los Angeles, Washington, Little Rock and Miami, and “were collecting information about the Clinton Foundation to see if there was evidence of financial crimes or influence-peddling, according to people familiar with the matter.”
The FBI field office in New York had done the most work on the Clinton Foundation case and received help from the FBI field office in Little Rock, the people familiar with the matter said. –WSJ
And in November, as tweeted by Wikileaks and reported on by the Dallas Observer, the Clinton Foundation has been under investigation by the IRS since July of 2016, after 64 GOP members of Congress received letters urging them to push for an investigation. The investigation has been notably held at the Dallas IRS office – far away from Washington.
The Earle Cabell Federal Building in downtown Dallas is an all purpose office complex, a bastion of federal bureaucracy located at 1100 Commerce St. Most people come for a passport or to get business done in front of a federal judge. But inside, a quiet review is underway that has direct ties to the raging presidential election: The local branch of the IRS’ Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division is reviewing the tax status of the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation.
So – while the FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton was sold as a simple matter of mishandling of classified material, we now have proof that the FBI set their sights on the Uranium One scandal weeks after they began looking into Hillary Clinton’s emails. We also know that five FBI field offices and the IRS have been investigating the Clinton Foundation on accusations of pay-to-play and other criminal acts.
Any bets on who’s indicted next?
Iconic Vin Scully finally breaks his silence over NFL anthem protests
By Bryan Chai
Vin Scully is rightfully known as the iconic voice of the Dodgers.
But that doesn’t mean he’s not a fan of other sports.
He’s waxed nostalgic of his Lakers’ broadcast counterpart, the equally legendary Chick Hearn, for years. He’s also broadcast events such as NFL and NBA games, and even professional golf earlier in his career.
One sport that Scully will no longer watch is pro football — specifically, the NFL.
And his grievance is the same reason that many Americans are tuning out the NFL.
During an “Evening With Vin Scully” at the Pasadena Civic Center in California, the legendary sports broadcaster finally opened up about the NFL’s national anthem protests.
“I have only one personal thought, really. And I am so disappointed,” began Scully. It’s a sentiment echoed by many.
Scully went on to reveal that he used to be a huge fan of the NFL, and that it was one of his favorite things to look forward to once baseball season was over.
“And I used to love, during the fall and winter, to watch the NFL on Sunday,” Scully continued.
Scully also used some of his well-known, self-deprecating humor to describe his patriotism.
“And it’s not that I’m some great patriot. I was in the Navy for a year — didn’t go anywhere, didn’t do anything,” Scully said. “But I have overwhelming respect and admiration for anyone who puts on a uniform and goes to war,” Scully said.
Scully saved perhaps his most poignant comments for last.
“So the only thing I can do in my little way is not to preach,” he said. “I will never watch another NFL game.”
Scully often used broadcasts on holidays like Memorial Day, the Fourth of July and the anniversary of D-Day to educate his listeners on the history of why those days were so significant in American history.
So suffice it to say Scully takes the symbolism of the flag and the national anthem very seriously. And while players who protest the anthem almost always claim their protest is not about the flag or the anthem, Scully doesn’t see it that way.
The issue of NFL players using the national anthem as a platform to protest doesn’t seem like it’s going to go away anytime soon.
And for now, it has cost the league one of the most iconic sports fans.
But that doesn’t mean he’s not a fan of other sports.
He’s waxed nostalgic of his Lakers’ broadcast counterpart, the equally legendary Chick Hearn, for years. He’s also broadcast events such as NFL and NBA games, and even professional golf earlier in his career.
One sport that Scully will no longer watch is pro football — specifically, the NFL.
And his grievance is the same reason that many Americans are tuning out the NFL.
During an “Evening With Vin Scully” at the Pasadena Civic Center in California, the legendary sports broadcaster finally opened up about the NFL’s national anthem protests.
“I have only one personal thought, really. And I am so disappointed,” began Scully. It’s a sentiment echoed by many.
Scully went on to reveal that he used to be a huge fan of the NFL, and that it was one of his favorite things to look forward to once baseball season was over.
“And I used to love, during the fall and winter, to watch the NFL on Sunday,” Scully continued.
Scully also used some of his well-known, self-deprecating humor to describe his patriotism.
“And it’s not that I’m some great patriot. I was in the Navy for a year — didn’t go anywhere, didn’t do anything,” Scully said. “But I have overwhelming respect and admiration for anyone who puts on a uniform and goes to war,” Scully said.
Scully saved perhaps his most poignant comments for last.
“So the only thing I can do in my little way is not to preach,” he said. “I will never watch another NFL game.”
Scully often used broadcasts on holidays like Memorial Day, the Fourth of July and the anniversary of D-Day to educate his listeners on the history of why those days were so significant in American history.
So suffice it to say Scully takes the symbolism of the flag and the national anthem very seriously. And while players who protest the anthem almost always claim their protest is not about the flag or the anthem, Scully doesn’t see it that way.
The issue of NFL players using the national anthem as a platform to protest doesn’t seem like it’s going to go away anytime soon.
And for now, it has cost the league one of the most iconic sports fans.
Here’s plenty of proof that liberals are just plain nuts
By Wayne Allyn Root Review-Journal
By Wayne Allyn Root Review-Journal
Bowe Bergdahl, one of the worst traitors in America’s history, was just given a slap on the wrist by a liberal judge. No jail time. Multiple heroes and patriots who loved our country gave their lives searching for this traitor. The liberal judge didn’t care.
One hero soldier is badly brain damaged for life. He can’t speak or walk. He can’t kiss or hug his wife or child. The liberal judge didn’t care.
Obama traded five dangerous radical Islamic field generals for Bowe. They are back on the battlefield killing Americans. The liberal judge didn’t care.
Proof liberals are just plain nuts.
Donna Brazile finally threw Hillary Clinton under the bus. She is the most important and credible witness to ever turn on Hillary. Brazile just admitted that Hillary rigged the 2016 Democratic presidential primary. Hillary stole the nomination.
So says Brazile — the former chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee. Even ultra-liberal feminist U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren now agrees. She says the nomination was rigged. No one has ever rigged a presidential primary in our history — until Hillary. Brazile’s testimony can send Hillary to prison.
The reaction from the mainstream media? Barely a peep. America’s most famous Democrat stole the presidential primary and the mainstream media ignored the story.
Proof liberals are just plain nuts.
The far left domestic terrorist organization antifa had rallies on Saturday across the country. Deadlines require that I write this column before the rallies. I pray there was no violence. But it’s a fact that the radical liberal, communist and anarchist leaders of antifa have called for violence, the assassination of our president and death to white Americans.
Tom Bloke, one of the leaders of antifa, threatened on Twitter only days ago, “can’t wait for November 4th when millions of anifa super soldiers will behead all white parents and small business owners in the town square.” It’s unclear if this is really their goal or just exaggerated propaganda meant to intimidate and frighten the good people of America. Perhaps these village idiots are daydreaming out loud about their fondest fantasies.
Proof liberals are just plain nuts.
A new book by my friend Edward Klein, the former editor of the New York Times magazine, reports that antifa now has a working relationship with ISIS.
He quotes from an FBI field report dated July 11. “There is clearly overwhelming evidence that there are growing ties between U.S. radicals and the Islamic State, as well as several ISIS offshoots and splinter groups … there is evidence from informants that (ISIS) is helping (antifa) acquire bomb-making equipment and toxic chemicals and gasses.”
The FBI report also explains how an antifa contingent traveled from Oakland to Syria to meet with ISIS leaders for tactical training and to “discuss possible massive disruptive attacks in the U.S.”
Proof liberals are just plain nuts.
A new report proves ESPN is dying. ESPN lost nearly half a million subscribers in October alone. That adds up to more than 15,000 lost subscribers per day. Critics and even some of ESPN’s own hosts have publicly stated this is a reaction to the over-the-top liberal politics espoused by the network. But the leadership at ESPN refuses to ban politics on a sports network. They ignore the fact that most sports fans are white, conservative, macho, testosterone-driven males. Their audience — their customers — voted overwhelmingly for Donald Trump. The delusional liberals at ESPN just won’t face reality. So they’re destroying a billion-dollar business.
Proof liberals are just plain nuts.
Finally, we come to the terror attack in New York this past week. It turns out that radical liberal New York Mayor Bill de Blasio was convinced by Muslim donors and Muslim religious leaders in New York to end the police surveillance of mosques. The terrorist who killed eight innocent New Yorkers worshipped at one of the mosques under surveillance. Maybe this tragedy could have been prevented. But the liberal mayor of New York was more worried about offending radicals and potential terrorists than protecting his own citizens.
Proof liberals are just plain nuts. And, most importantly, a danger to all of us.
Colin Kaepernick Got Some Very Bad News That’s Killed His NFL Comeback Hopes
The unthinkable almost happened.
Rumors spread that America-hater Colin Kaepernick was about to be signed to an NFL team.
And then the leader of the anti-American anthem protests got some very bad news.
When Houston Texans starting quarterback Deshaun Watson went down with a season ending knee injury, there was speculation that Kaepernick would end up on the roster.
Watson lit up the NFL like no rookie quarterback has ever done before with 19 touchdown passes, and he leaves the Texans with a huge hole to fill as they try to stay in the AFC South Division race.
With former backup Tom Savage as the only option, speculation ramped up that Kaepernick would quickly join the Texans.
But the Texans went with former Penn State quarterback Matt McGloin – who played in college for head coach Bill O’Brien – and T.J. Yates to fill out their roster.
The team passed on Kaepernick – and all the baggage he brings – after owner Bob McNair did not o.k. a workout.
However, it was only days ago did Kaepernick’s lawyer predict he would be on a roster within 10 days.
247sports.com reports:
During an appearance on The Adam Carolla Show, Kaepernick’s attorney Mark Geragos stated that he expects his client to be signed by an NFL team within the next ten days.
“I think within the next 10 days somebody will sign him,” said Geragos. “I think somebody’s gonna sign him. I think the NFL has to come to their senses, and realize every day that goes by just proves the collusion case even more.”
Kaepernick opted out of his contract with the San Francisco 49ers in March, and generated little interest from NFL teams in free agency. He visited the Seattle Seahawks in May, but was not offered a contract, and drew interest from the Baltimore Ravens after an injury to quarterback Joe Flacco, but was not seriously considered after his girlfriend disparaged Ravens owner Steve Bisciotti and team legend Ray Lewis via Twitter. Earlier this month, Kaepernick filed a collusion lawsuit against the NFL, alleging that the league’s owners colluded with each other to keep him off a roster.”
But Kaepernick’s own play and conduct will ensure he never gets signed.
He deteriorated so badly during his time in San Francisco that he was benched.
Then he kick started the anti-American anthem protests, attacked police officers as pigs, and celebrated Che Guevera – who was Fidel Castro’s butcher and who ran the communist dictator’s torture chambers.
Kaepernick lit the match in the fire that is now burning down the NFL’s business.
Ratings are down.
Fans are staying away.
Polls show the league’s popularity plummeting.
And now sponsors such as Papa John’s are saying being associated with the NFL is bad for business.
The Podesta Brothers Get Squeezed by Robert Mueller
When former FBI Director and now-Special Counsel Robert Mueller began his investigation into possible influence by Russia on the 2016 presidential election, he was initially focused on possible wrongdoing by President Trump or Trump’s campaign staff at the time. However, as the probe has continued, the scope of Mueller’s investigation has enlarged, as typically happens with purviews of special prosecutors.
In late July, Mueller ordered a pre-dawn raid by the FBI on the New Jersey home of Paul Manafort, the former manager of Trump’s presidential campaign. Officially, this was done in order to prevent Manafort from possibly destroying documents in case he got advance word of the search. But according to a new report on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson Tonight show, the investigation into (and potential future indictment of) Manafort is only tangentially connected to the Trump campaign.
The bigger issue is that prior to working on the Trump campaign, back in 2011, Manafort had a number of Russian clients he did political consulting for. More interesting than this, however, is that Manafort did not maintain an office in Russia; instead, he operated out of Ukraine and claimed that his business was based in Belgium.
That business, named the European Center for a Modern Ukraine, had a Belgian phone number that simply forwarded calls to Ukraine, which fooled at least some people into believing Manafort had European connections and/or interests.
But the really interesting part of Manafort’s business back then is that in Washington, D.C., Manafort met and worked with John and Tony Podesta of the Podesta Group, a lobbying firm with deep ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton, the Obama administration and the Democratic National Committee. John Podesta, the former chief of staff for ex-President Bill Clinton, ultimately left the Podesta Group to be a special counselor to former President Obama and then, more prominently, to run Hillary Clinton’s campaign for the presidency in 2015. He also had founded the Center for American Progress (CAP), a left-wing think tank and advocacy organization, in 2003. (CAP is the umbrella group for a number of media vehicles such as Think Progress and Science Progress).
Starting in 2011, via Obama and Hillary Clinton (who was then the Secretary of State), the Podestas were in a position to have legislation created, deals approved and waivers signed that benefited Russian oligarchs and companies. One confidential source who Fox’s Carlson extensively interviewed was a longtime employee of the Podesta Group. This source claims that Manafort was at the Podesta Group offices regularly every month starting in 2011 and dined alone with Tony and John Podesta. This same source described tours Manafort gave to Russian oligarchs of Washington and meetings he set up with them with American Congressmen.
In 2013, the Podesta Group hired an employee named David Adams. This man previously was the assistant secretary of state for legislative affairs under Hillary Clinton at the State Department. Adams had been responsible for helping to confirm more than 120 political appointees at the Department of State and served as a daily personal briefer for Hillary Clinton. Thus, when he began working for the Podesta Group, Adams had extensive contacts at the State Department and could get Hillary Clinton on the phone at the drop of a hat.
Soon, meetings were being held at the Podesta Group regarding Uranium One, a Russian-backed company that sought to acquire 20 percent of the American supply of uranium, a critical component of nuclear power plants and atomic bombs and missiles. The Podesta brothers used their influence to get a deal approved for the purchase while Uranium One board members committed $100 million to the Clinton Foundation and got a Russian bank connected to the deal to give Bill Clinton $500,000 for a speech in Moscow. According to Carlson’s confidential source, “Tony Podesta was basically part of the Clinton Foundation.”
Manafort made no secret of the fact that his Russian clients wanted stronger ties to Clinton because there were ongoing rumors that she was going to run for president again in 2016. Carlson’s source claims that Manafort’s clients gave many millions of dollars to the Podestas. But because the Podesta Group didn’t have a board of directors, its finances are — and were — relatively confidential. In fact, this source described the accounting books of the Podesta Group as “a treasure trove and highly secret.”
The source claims that Robert Mueller’s investigation has now switched gears from focusing on Russian influence via the Trump campaign to focusing on past influence on the Obama administration via Manafort, the Podestas and others. “The Podesta Group,” says this source, “is in their crosshairs.”
Rumors are that Mueller’s investigation “has now morphed into a criminal inquiry,” particularly over whether the Podesta Group committed violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), which mandates that lobbyists or agents representing foreign interests must declare their relationships and financial remuneration.
As Tucker Carlson reported on his show, “The story we heard [via our source] overturns much of what we think we know about Russian attempts to influence American policy. We believe our source is telling the truth. We don’t think he has reason to lie to us. The facts we’ve been able to check have turned out to be accurate. We believe our source has exposed behavior that undermines this country, but that, unfortunately, is common here in Washington.”
Carlson has promised to dig much deeper into this story. But already, it appears that the “Russian collusion” that the nation’s mainstream media has been creating a circus sideshow about doesn’t so much concern the Trump campaign as it does the former Obama administration, Hillary and Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton’s State Department.
If everything that’s been reported by Carlson is indeed true, John and Tony Podesta may have hell to pay, and that’s not even mentioning the Clintons, possibly Barack Obama and/or specific members of Congress. In short, the Democrats may eventually regret ever pushing for a Special Counsel regarding Russia in the early part of this year, but it remains to be seen how deeply Robert Mueller will be committed to prosecuting any criminal offenses he discovers in this regard.
A long read but worth the effort.
The Innocents
By: Estsanatlehi
Inspired by the life of Dr. Jan Pol, this is dedicated to all the faceless people who risked their lives daily to save and shelter the helpless from being victims of the Holocaust. History does not know their names, but God does. Some images may be disturbing.
Great Orators of the Democrat
Party
PRESENT
*** "One man with courage makes a majority." ~Andrew Jackson
*** "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself." ~Franklin D. Roosevelt
*** "The buck stops here." ~Harry S. Truman
*** "Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country." ~John F. Kennedy
RECENT
"It depends what your definition of 'is' is?'' ~William Jefferson Clinton
"Those rumors are false. I believe in the sanctity of marriage." ~John Edwards
"What difference does it make?" (re: Benghazi). ~Hillary Clinton
"I invented the Internet." ~Al Gore
"America is, is no longer, uh, what it, uh, could be, uh, what it was once was, uh, and I say to myself, uh, I don't want that future, uh, for my children." ~Barack Obama
"I have campaigned in all 57 states." ~Barack Obama (Quoted 2008)
"You don't need God anymore; you have us Democrats." ~Nancy Pelosi (Quoted 2006)
"Paying taxes is voluntary." ~ Sen. Harry Reid (How’s that for oomgalagala?)
"Bill is the greatest husband and father I know. No one is more faithful, true, and honest than he is." ~ Hillary Rodham Clinton (Quoted 1998)
"You have a business. You didn't build that. Someone else did!" ~
Barack Obama (Quoted 2012)
And the most ridiculous gem of wisdom, from the "Mother Superior Moron": "We just have to pass the Healthcare Bill to see what's in it." ~Nancy Pelosi (Quoted 2010 )
(As one Doctor said: “That is also the perfect definition of a stool sample.”)
Beyond a doubt, the greatest statement of all was made by Democrat House Speaker Sam Rayburn at the first Congressional session after Ted Kennedy was caught, on camera, having sex with one of his aides on the deck of his yacht ... "Ah see that the good Senatuh from the great state of Massutwoshits has changed his position on off-shore drillin'."
Champion quote --- "My fear is if North Korea nukes us
Trump gonna get us into a war." ~ Maxine Waters........2017
Party
PRESENT
*** "One man with courage makes a majority." ~Andrew Jackson
*** "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself." ~Franklin D. Roosevelt
*** "The buck stops here." ~Harry S. Truman
*** "Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country." ~John F. Kennedy
RECENT
"It depends what your definition of 'is' is?'' ~William Jefferson Clinton
"Those rumors are false. I believe in the sanctity of marriage." ~John Edwards
"What difference does it make?" (re: Benghazi). ~Hillary Clinton
"I invented the Internet." ~Al Gore
"America is, is no longer, uh, what it, uh, could be, uh, what it was once was, uh, and I say to myself, uh, I don't want that future, uh, for my children." ~Barack Obama
"I have campaigned in all 57 states." ~Barack Obama (Quoted 2008)
"You don't need God anymore; you have us Democrats." ~Nancy Pelosi (Quoted 2006)
"Paying taxes is voluntary." ~ Sen. Harry Reid (How’s that for oomgalagala?)
"Bill is the greatest husband and father I know. No one is more faithful, true, and honest than he is." ~ Hillary Rodham Clinton (Quoted 1998)
"You have a business. You didn't build that. Someone else did!" ~
Barack Obama (Quoted 2012)
And the most ridiculous gem of wisdom, from the "Mother Superior Moron": "We just have to pass the Healthcare Bill to see what's in it." ~Nancy Pelosi (Quoted 2010 )
(As one Doctor said: “That is also the perfect definition of a stool sample.”)
Beyond a doubt, the greatest statement of all was made by Democrat House Speaker Sam Rayburn at the first Congressional session after Ted Kennedy was caught, on camera, having sex with one of his aides on the deck of his yacht ... "Ah see that the good Senatuh from the great state of Massutwoshits has changed his position on off-shore drillin'."
Champion quote --- "My fear is if North Korea nukes us
Trump gonna get us into a war." ~ Maxine Waters........2017
Porn Star Will Run Against Putin, Wants Death Penalty for Sexual Harassment After Weinstein
by JOHN HAYWARD
Former porn star Elena Berkova of Murmansk, Russia, used an Instagram video to declare her candidacy for president against Vladimir Putin in the 2018 election.
She apparently does not intend to run a stuffy old traditional sort of campaign, having chosen lingerie and smart glasses for her announcement video. This may be a dangerous indication that the entire world has become a Michael Bay film.
“I made this decision recently, because women are actively taking part in the presidential campaign,” said Berkova, referring to such previously declared contenders as former TV and radio host Ekaternia Gordon and TV personality Ksenia Sobchak. Additionally, model and TV presenter Anfisa Chekhova has promised to run for president if her Instagram post on the subject accumulates 200,000 likes. To date, Russia has not had a female president.
Berkova noted that the other female candidates “are from show business” as well and pointed out that she has a political resume, having run for mayor of Sochi. During that 2009 race, she billed herself as the candidate from “the Party of Love” and released a topless campaign ad. This was not enough to overcome pro-Kremlin candidate Anatoly Pakhomov, who won with 77 percent of the vote, according to the official tally, which was challenged as a fraudulent attempt to avoid a run-off vote by second-place finisher Boris Nemtsov.
Oddly enough, given her history of running in various states of undress, one of Berkova’s platform proposals is “clothing censorship,” including strict regulations on the minimum length of skirts.
“She also proposed to restore the Soviet-era law that ordered prison sentences to ‘parasites’ or citizens who did not work without a valid reason and introduce a ‘tax on poverty.’ At the same time, she would offer state credit with no interest to those who start small businesses,” Russia’s RT.com said of Berkova’s announcement video.
“She said that she wants to make divorce almost impossible for men through taxes and red tape. She also promised to introduce sex education and sex exams in school, as well as to pass a law that would require future parents to obtain a childbirth license from the state, by proving their good health and tax discipline,” the RT summary of her platform continues.
“I plan to make divorces almost impossible for men, as these days women bear almost all the responsibility for children,” she explained, as quoted by the UK Daily Mail. She said mandatory sex exams are needed because “often our youth still do not know about sexual legal norms, hygiene, not to mention pleasure.”
Most dramatically, Berkova declared that she is “fed up with Weinsteins” and therefore wants the death penalty for sexual harassment.
Her most formidable opponent in the race, incumbent President Vladimir Putin, may or may not remain fully clothed throughout his campaign. Unfortunately for Berkova, his advantages include being the authoritarian ruler of a police state, extensive experience in skulduggery by virtue of his KGB career, and being substantially older than the specified minimum age of 35 for the presidency, while she is only 32.
G’ day…Ciao…Helen and Moe Lauzier
Thus articles
that is all articles
This time, hopefully can provide benefits to you all. Okay, see you in another article post.
You are now reading the article the link address https://fairyforreference.blogspot.com/2017/11/httpift_6.html
0 Response to " "
Post a Comment